COX-2选择性和传统非甾体抗炎药对实验性胃溃疡愈合的比较

Tau Ja, Q. W, El-Zimaity Hmt, Opekun Ar, G. Dy
{"title":"COX-2选择性和传统非甾体抗炎药对实验性胃溃疡愈合的比较","authors":"Tau Ja, Q. W, El-Zimaity Hmt, Opekun Ar, G. Dy","doi":"10.26420/austinjgastroenterol.2021.1114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impair gastrointestinal ulcers healing. This study evaluated the role of cyclooxygenase isozymes COX- 1 and COX-2 in the healing of acute gastric ulcers in humans. Methods: This was an open-label, endoscopist-blind, parallel-group study, age and sex matched at baseline in normal volunteers. At endoscopy, we took four large jumbo forceps gastric mucosal biopsies (2 from each of the antrum and corpus). Subjects received celecoxib 200mg bid), naproxen 500mg bid), nabumetone 1000mg bid or placebo until end of study. Endoscopies were performed after 5 days and every 3 days until complete re-epithelialization of all lesions or 30 days. Survival analysis was used to compare time-to-healing defined as the day with complete re-epithelialization of all ulcers. Results: Fifty-two subjects completed the study, each received four biopsyinduced gastric ulcers (204 total ulcers; the majority included the muscularis mucosa). The mean time-to-healing was 9.4 ± 0.4 days with placebo, 10.5 ± 0.4 with celecoxib, 11.1 ± 0.6 with naproxen, and 12.3 ± 0.9 with nabumetone. The time to healing of each ulcer or all ulcers was significantly delayed compared to placebo with naproxen (p=0.01) and nabumetone (p=0.002) but not with celecoxib (p=0.07). Conclusion: The COX-1 preferential inhibitor naproxen and the balanced COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor nabumetone significantly delayed the healing of ulcers. With the COX-2 specific inhibitor celecoxib, healing was delayed but not significantly. Synthesis of COX-1 derived prostaglandins appears to be important in the healing of gastric ulcers in humans.","PeriodicalId":93268,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of COX-2 Selective and Traditional NSAIDs on Experimental Gastric Ulcer Healing in Humans\",\"authors\":\"Tau Ja, Q. W, El-Zimaity Hmt, Opekun Ar, G. Dy\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjgastroenterol.2021.1114\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impair gastrointestinal ulcers healing. This study evaluated the role of cyclooxygenase isozymes COX- 1 and COX-2 in the healing of acute gastric ulcers in humans. Methods: This was an open-label, endoscopist-blind, parallel-group study, age and sex matched at baseline in normal volunteers. At endoscopy, we took four large jumbo forceps gastric mucosal biopsies (2 from each of the antrum and corpus). Subjects received celecoxib 200mg bid), naproxen 500mg bid), nabumetone 1000mg bid or placebo until end of study. Endoscopies were performed after 5 days and every 3 days until complete re-epithelialization of all lesions or 30 days. Survival analysis was used to compare time-to-healing defined as the day with complete re-epithelialization of all ulcers. Results: Fifty-two subjects completed the study, each received four biopsyinduced gastric ulcers (204 total ulcers; the majority included the muscularis mucosa). The mean time-to-healing was 9.4 ± 0.4 days with placebo, 10.5 ± 0.4 with celecoxib, 11.1 ± 0.6 with naproxen, and 12.3 ± 0.9 with nabumetone. The time to healing of each ulcer or all ulcers was significantly delayed compared to placebo with naproxen (p=0.01) and nabumetone (p=0.002) but not with celecoxib (p=0.07). Conclusion: The COX-1 preferential inhibitor naproxen and the balanced COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor nabumetone significantly delayed the healing of ulcers. With the COX-2 specific inhibitor celecoxib, healing was delayed but not significantly. Synthesis of COX-1 derived prostaglandins appears to be important in the healing of gastric ulcers in humans.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjgastroenterol.2021.1114\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjgastroenterol.2021.1114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非甾体抗炎药损害胃肠道溃疡的愈合。本研究评估了环氧合酶同工酶COX-1和COX-2在人类急性胃溃疡愈合中的作用。方法:这是一项开放标签、内窥镜盲、平行组研究,在基线时对正常志愿者进行年龄和性别匹配。在内窥镜检查中,我们进行了四次大钳胃粘膜活检(胃窦和胃体各2次)。受试者接受塞来昔布200mg bid)、萘普生500mg bid),萘丁美酮1000mg bid或安慰剂,直至研究结束。5天后和每3天进行一次内镜检查,直到所有病变完全上皮化或30天。生存分析用于比较愈合时间,即所有溃疡完全上皮化的当天。结果:52名受试者完成了研究,每个受试者接受了4次生物相诱导的胃溃疡(共204次溃疡;大多数包括粘膜肌层)。安慰剂组的平均愈合时间为9.4±0.4天,塞来昔布组为10.5±0.4天、萘普生组为11.1±0.6天,萘丁美酮组为12.3±0.9天。与安慰剂组相比,萘普生(p=0.01)和萘丁美酮(p=0.002)显著延迟了每个溃疡或所有溃疡的愈合时间,而塞来昔布(p=0.07)则没有。结论:COX-1优先抑制剂萘普生和平衡COX-1/COX-2抑制剂萘丁美醇显著延迟了溃疡的愈合。使用COX-2特异性抑制剂塞来昔布,愈合延迟,但并不显著。COX-1衍生的前列腺素的合成在人类胃溃疡的愈合中似乎很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of COX-2 Selective and Traditional NSAIDs on Experimental Gastric Ulcer Healing in Humans
Background: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impair gastrointestinal ulcers healing. This study evaluated the role of cyclooxygenase isozymes COX- 1 and COX-2 in the healing of acute gastric ulcers in humans. Methods: This was an open-label, endoscopist-blind, parallel-group study, age and sex matched at baseline in normal volunteers. At endoscopy, we took four large jumbo forceps gastric mucosal biopsies (2 from each of the antrum and corpus). Subjects received celecoxib 200mg bid), naproxen 500mg bid), nabumetone 1000mg bid or placebo until end of study. Endoscopies were performed after 5 days and every 3 days until complete re-epithelialization of all lesions or 30 days. Survival analysis was used to compare time-to-healing defined as the day with complete re-epithelialization of all ulcers. Results: Fifty-two subjects completed the study, each received four biopsyinduced gastric ulcers (204 total ulcers; the majority included the muscularis mucosa). The mean time-to-healing was 9.4 ± 0.4 days with placebo, 10.5 ± 0.4 with celecoxib, 11.1 ± 0.6 with naproxen, and 12.3 ± 0.9 with nabumetone. The time to healing of each ulcer or all ulcers was significantly delayed compared to placebo with naproxen (p=0.01) and nabumetone (p=0.002) but not with celecoxib (p=0.07). Conclusion: The COX-1 preferential inhibitor naproxen and the balanced COX-1/COX-2 inhibitor nabumetone significantly delayed the healing of ulcers. With the COX-2 specific inhibitor celecoxib, healing was delayed but not significantly. Synthesis of COX-1 derived prostaglandins appears to be important in the healing of gastric ulcers in humans.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pancreatic Solitary Fibrous Tumor as Result of Extracranial Metastatic Disease Co-Variation of Serum Osteoprotegerin and Pigment-Epithelial Derived Factor as Biomarker of Pancreatic Cancer Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Slows the Progression of HBV-Related Liver Diseases and Induces Virologic Response in Patients with HBV Infection Shen-Qi-Di-Huang Decoction Prevents Cisplatin-Induced Kidney and Liver Injury by Inhibiting Apoptosis Seven Key Genes Correlated with Immune Infiltration Reveal Prognostic Significance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1