一项测量小学教师实施标准数学教学的调查的有效性论证:基于论证的方法

Joseph Rino, Damon L. Bahr, Ross Larsen, R. Sudweeks, J. Robinson, Kimberlee K. Everson, E. Monroe
{"title":"一项测量小学教师实施标准数学教学的调查的有效性论证:基于论证的方法","authors":"Joseph Rino, Damon L. Bahr, Ross Larsen, R. Sudweeks, J. Robinson, Kimberlee K. Everson, E. Monroe","doi":"10.1080/19477503.2020.1846967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper the authors review the validity claims of a survey published in 2003, A Survey Measuring Elementary Teachers’ Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching. Though the original survey received widespread attention and use, little formal review had been performed beyond the original estimates of reliability and validity. A content analysis was performed as well as exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in order to understand the continued validity of the interpretations and uses of the instrument results. Although the content the survey measures aligns with contemporary conceptualizations of high-quality teaching practices and was originally published with a reliability estimate and evidence of its overall validity, its use should be modified to some degree in order to align with the further validity analyses described in this paper.","PeriodicalId":36817,"journal":{"name":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","volume":"13 1","pages":"91 - 106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2020.1846967","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Validity Argument of A Survey Measuring Elementary Teachers’ Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching: An Argument-Based Approach\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Rino, Damon L. Bahr, Ross Larsen, R. Sudweeks, J. Robinson, Kimberlee K. Everson, E. Monroe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19477503.2020.1846967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper the authors review the validity claims of a survey published in 2003, A Survey Measuring Elementary Teachers’ Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching. Though the original survey received widespread attention and use, little formal review had been performed beyond the original estimates of reliability and validity. A content analysis was performed as well as exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in order to understand the continued validity of the interpretations and uses of the instrument results. Although the content the survey measures aligns with contemporary conceptualizations of high-quality teaching practices and was originally published with a reliability estimate and evidence of its overall validity, its use should be modified to some degree in order to align with the further validity analyses described in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigations in Mathematics Learning\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19477503.2020.1846967\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigations in Mathematics Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1846967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigations in Mathematics Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2020.1846967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文回顾了2003年发表的一项调查《衡量小学教师实施标准数学教学的调查》的有效性声明。尽管最初的调查得到了广泛的关注和使用,但除了最初对可靠性和有效性的估计之外,几乎没有进行过正式的审查。进行了内容分析以及探索性和验证性因素分析,以了解仪器结果的解释和使用的持续有效性。尽管调查测量的内容与当代高质量教学实践的概念相一致,并且最初发表时对其总体有效性进行了可靠性估计和证据,但其使用应在一定程度上进行修改,以与本文中描述的进一步有效性分析相一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Validity Argument of A Survey Measuring Elementary Teachers’ Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching: An Argument-Based Approach
ABSTRACT In this paper the authors review the validity claims of a survey published in 2003, A Survey Measuring Elementary Teachers’ Implementation of Standards-Based Mathematics Teaching. Though the original survey received widespread attention and use, little formal review had been performed beyond the original estimates of reliability and validity. A content analysis was performed as well as exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses in order to understand the continued validity of the interpretations and uses of the instrument results. Although the content the survey measures aligns with contemporary conceptualizations of high-quality teaching practices and was originally published with a reliability estimate and evidence of its overall validity, its use should be modified to some degree in order to align with the further validity analyses described in this paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigations in Mathematics Learning
Investigations in Mathematics Learning Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Connections within the Multiplicative Field: A Case Study of Adán’s Mathematical Thinking Investigating the Complexity in Elementary Teachers’ Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking in Written Work Preservice Secondary Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching: Focus on Reflective Practice The Role of Units Coordination in Preservice Elementary Teachers' Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching Units Construction and Coordination: Past, Present, and Future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1