从超级英雄到悲剧英雄——对库格勒《黑豹》的类型与性格的再思考

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10436928.2021.1977566
Kenton Butcher
{"title":"从超级英雄到悲剧英雄——对库格勒《黑豹》的类型与性格的再思考","authors":"Kenton Butcher","doi":"10.1080/10436928.2021.1977566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a 2019 interview with Empire magazine, Martin Scorsese created a small controversy when he dismissed Marvel’s superhero films as “theme parks” rather than “the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being” (“The Irishman Week”). Scorsese’s remarks generated a buzz, and in November 2019, he wrote a New York Times op-ed in which he doubled down on his position. In the essay, he writes that Marvel films do not lack quality but instead lack “revelation, mystery or genuine emotional danger. Nothing is at risk.... They are sequels in name but they are remakes in spirit” (“I Said”). For Scorsese, this avoidance of risk stems from the movie industry’s aversion to loss on investment, so studios produce films that are “market-researched, audience-tested, vetted, modified, revetted and remodified until they’re ready for consumption” (“I Said”). The studios’ profit motive leads to the assembly-line production of franchise films that are known to make money, and this eliminates an essential component of cinema as Scorsese sees it: “the unifying vision of an individual artist,” which is the “riskiest factor of all” (“I Said”). As a result, Scorsese breaks down all contemporary films into two categories: “There’s worldwide audiovisual entertainment, and there’s cinema” with Marvel films belonging to the former, inferior category (“I Said”). Although online apologists of Marvel Universe films paint Scorsese as an out of touch curmudgeon, his extensive knowledge of film history, insider’s perspective of the movie industry, and the sheer number of superhero films released over the past decade suggest he may be at least partially correct. At the time of writing this essay, since the release of Iron Man in 2008, twenty-three Marvel films have been released, grossing billions of dollars, with several more slated for production. Nor is Scorsese alone in his critique of Marvel films as uninspired tripe. Bill Nasson takes Black Panther to task along lines similar to Scorsese, lambasting the film’s formulaic plot, its cartoony computergenerated imagery, and its preachy dialogue. Although complimentary in regards to the film’s representation of Africa, Nasson’s essay characterizes","PeriodicalId":42717,"journal":{"name":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","volume":"32 1","pages":"268 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Superhero to Tragic Hero: Rethinking Genre and Character in Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther\",\"authors\":\"Kenton Butcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10436928.2021.1977566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a 2019 interview with Empire magazine, Martin Scorsese created a small controversy when he dismissed Marvel’s superhero films as “theme parks” rather than “the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being” (“The Irishman Week”). Scorsese’s remarks generated a buzz, and in November 2019, he wrote a New York Times op-ed in which he doubled down on his position. In the essay, he writes that Marvel films do not lack quality but instead lack “revelation, mystery or genuine emotional danger. Nothing is at risk.... They are sequels in name but they are remakes in spirit” (“I Said”). For Scorsese, this avoidance of risk stems from the movie industry’s aversion to loss on investment, so studios produce films that are “market-researched, audience-tested, vetted, modified, revetted and remodified until they’re ready for consumption” (“I Said”). The studios’ profit motive leads to the assembly-line production of franchise films that are known to make money, and this eliminates an essential component of cinema as Scorsese sees it: “the unifying vision of an individual artist,” which is the “riskiest factor of all” (“I Said”). As a result, Scorsese breaks down all contemporary films into two categories: “There’s worldwide audiovisual entertainment, and there’s cinema” with Marvel films belonging to the former, inferior category (“I Said”). Although online apologists of Marvel Universe films paint Scorsese as an out of touch curmudgeon, his extensive knowledge of film history, insider’s perspective of the movie industry, and the sheer number of superhero films released over the past decade suggest he may be at least partially correct. At the time of writing this essay, since the release of Iron Man in 2008, twenty-three Marvel films have been released, grossing billions of dollars, with several more slated for production. Nor is Scorsese alone in his critique of Marvel films as uninspired tripe. Bill Nasson takes Black Panther to task along lines similar to Scorsese, lambasting the film’s formulaic plot, its cartoony computergenerated imagery, and its preachy dialogue. Although complimentary in regards to the film’s representation of Africa, Nasson’s essay characterizes\",\"PeriodicalId\":42717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"268 - 284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2021.1977566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10436928.2021.1977566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2019年接受《帝国》杂志采访时,马丁·斯科塞斯将漫威的超级英雄电影斥为“主题公园”,而不是“人类试图向另一个人传达情感和心理体验的电影院”(《爱尔兰人周》),这引发了一场小争议。斯科塞斯的言论引起了轰动,2019年11月,他在《纽约时报》的一篇专栏文章中加倍强调了自己的立场。在这篇文章中,他写道,漫威电影并不缺乏质量,而是缺乏“揭露、神秘或真正的情感危险。没有什么是危险的……它们名义上是续集,但精神上是翻拍的”(《我说过》)。对斯科塞斯来说,这种风险的规避源于电影业对投资损失的厌恶,因此电影公司制作的电影“经过市场研究、观众测试、审查、修改、翻新和再修改,直到它们准备好消费”(“我说”)。电影公司的盈利动机导致了以赚钱著称的特许经营电影的流水线生产,这消除了斯科塞斯所认为的电影的一个重要组成部分:“艺术家个体的统一愿景”,这是“所有因素中风险最大的”(《我说》)。因此,斯科塞斯将所有当代电影分为两类:“有全世界的视听娱乐,也有电影”,漫威电影属于前一类,即劣质电影(《我说过》)。尽管漫威宇宙电影的网络辩护者将斯科塞斯描绘成一个脱离现实的乖戾之人,但他对电影史的广泛了解、业内人士对电影业的看法,以及过去十年上映的超级英雄电影数量,都表明他可能至少部分是正确的。在撰写本文时,自2008年《钢铁侠》上映以来,漫威已经上映了23部电影,总收入高达数十亿美元,还有几部计划制作。斯科塞斯也不是唯一一个批评漫威电影缺乏灵感的人。比尔·纳森(Bill Nasson)以类似斯科塞斯(Scorsese)的方式指责《黑豹》(Black Panther),抨击电影公式化的情节、卡通化的计算机生成图像和说教式的对话。尽管纳森的文章对电影中对非洲的描绘表示赞赏,但它的特点是
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Superhero to Tragic Hero: Rethinking Genre and Character in Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther
In a 2019 interview with Empire magazine, Martin Scorsese created a small controversy when he dismissed Marvel’s superhero films as “theme parks” rather than “the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being” (“The Irishman Week”). Scorsese’s remarks generated a buzz, and in November 2019, he wrote a New York Times op-ed in which he doubled down on his position. In the essay, he writes that Marvel films do not lack quality but instead lack “revelation, mystery or genuine emotional danger. Nothing is at risk.... They are sequels in name but they are remakes in spirit” (“I Said”). For Scorsese, this avoidance of risk stems from the movie industry’s aversion to loss on investment, so studios produce films that are “market-researched, audience-tested, vetted, modified, revetted and remodified until they’re ready for consumption” (“I Said”). The studios’ profit motive leads to the assembly-line production of franchise films that are known to make money, and this eliminates an essential component of cinema as Scorsese sees it: “the unifying vision of an individual artist,” which is the “riskiest factor of all” (“I Said”). As a result, Scorsese breaks down all contemporary films into two categories: “There’s worldwide audiovisual entertainment, and there’s cinema” with Marvel films belonging to the former, inferior category (“I Said”). Although online apologists of Marvel Universe films paint Scorsese as an out of touch curmudgeon, his extensive knowledge of film history, insider’s perspective of the movie industry, and the sheer number of superhero films released over the past decade suggest he may be at least partially correct. At the time of writing this essay, since the release of Iron Man in 2008, twenty-three Marvel films have been released, grossing billions of dollars, with several more slated for production. Nor is Scorsese alone in his critique of Marvel films as uninspired tripe. Bill Nasson takes Black Panther to task along lines similar to Scorsese, lambasting the film’s formulaic plot, its cartoony computergenerated imagery, and its preachy dialogue. Although complimentary in regards to the film’s representation of Africa, Nasson’s essay characterizes
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory
LIT-Literature Interpretation Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Alex as the Product, Producer, and Consumer of Art in the Dilapidated State, in Anthony Burgess’s A Clockwork Orange Friendship and Art in Valerie Martin’s I Give It to You Reading As Conversation with the Overarching Blended Author (Or Roberto Bolaño): Joint Attention, Immersion, and Interaction The Objects of Jane Gardam The Book, Meaning, and Densities of Essential Forms in J.M. Coetzee’s Foe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1