动机策略能提高小组数学干预计划的效果吗?

IF 1.1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Applied School Psychology Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735
Robin S. Codding, J. Begeny, Kourtney R. Kromminga, Rebecca Edmunds, Jenna M. Klaft, Calvary R. Diggs, Annie Hansen-Burke
{"title":"动机策略能提高小组数学干预计划的效果吗?","authors":"Robin S. Codding, J. Begeny, Kourtney R. Kromminga, Rebecca Edmunds, Jenna M. Klaft, Calvary R. Diggs, Annie Hansen-Burke","doi":"10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Overall mathematics proficiency of fourth graders in the U.S. continues to be poor and students falling at or below the 25th percentile display declining performance (NCES, 2017), which suggests the need for schools to provide supplemental intervention supports as soon as skill gaps are observed. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of small group intervention programs that address whole number knowledge for elementary-aged children. Moreover, the contribution of motivational aspects of small group academic interventions is understudied and may be important for enhancing persistence and effort in mathematics. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative impact of two forms of intervention on mixed addition and subtraction fact fluency with second grade students: (a) evidence-based instructional components alone, and (b) a combination of instructional and motivational components. A multiple baseline design across three groups of second grade students was employed. Across groups, students benefitted from the combined intervention of both instructional and motivational components. Individual performance suggested variability in responsiveness to treatment. Participants rated the combined treatment package more favorably than the instructional components in isolation.","PeriodicalId":46345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Motivational Strategies Improve the Effects of a Small-Group Math Intervention Program?\",\"authors\":\"Robin S. Codding, J. Begeny, Kourtney R. Kromminga, Rebecca Edmunds, Jenna M. Klaft, Calvary R. Diggs, Annie Hansen-Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Overall mathematics proficiency of fourth graders in the U.S. continues to be poor and students falling at or below the 25th percentile display declining performance (NCES, 2017), which suggests the need for schools to provide supplemental intervention supports as soon as skill gaps are observed. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of small group intervention programs that address whole number knowledge for elementary-aged children. Moreover, the contribution of motivational aspects of small group academic interventions is understudied and may be important for enhancing persistence and effort in mathematics. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative impact of two forms of intervention on mixed addition and subtraction fact fluency with second grade students: (a) evidence-based instructional components alone, and (b) a combination of instructional and motivational components. A multiple baseline design across three groups of second grade students was employed. Across groups, students benefitted from the combined intervention of both instructional and motivational components. Individual performance suggested variability in responsiveness to treatment. Participants rated the combined treatment package more favorably than the instructional components in isolation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2019.1682735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要美国四年级学生的总体数学能力仍然很差,达到或低于第25百分位的学生表现出成绩下降(NCES,2017),这表明一旦发现技能差距,学校就需要提供补充干预支持。不幸的是,很少有针对小学年龄儿童整体知识的小组干预计划。此外,小组学术干预的动机方面的贡献还没有得到充分的研究,这可能对提高数学的持久性和努力性很重要。本研究的目的是检验两种形式的干预对二年级学生混合加减法事实流利性的相对影响:(a)单独的循证教学成分,以及(b)教学和动机成分的组合。采用了三组二年级学生的多基线设计。在各个小组中,学生受益于教学和动机成分的联合干预。个体表现表明对治疗的反应存在差异。参与者对综合治疗方案的评价高于单独的教学部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Motivational Strategies Improve the Effects of a Small-Group Math Intervention Program?
Abstract Overall mathematics proficiency of fourth graders in the U.S. continues to be poor and students falling at or below the 25th percentile display declining performance (NCES, 2017), which suggests the need for schools to provide supplemental intervention supports as soon as skill gaps are observed. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of small group intervention programs that address whole number knowledge for elementary-aged children. Moreover, the contribution of motivational aspects of small group academic interventions is understudied and may be important for enhancing persistence and effort in mathematics. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative impact of two forms of intervention on mixed addition and subtraction fact fluency with second grade students: (a) evidence-based instructional components alone, and (b) a combination of instructional and motivational components. A multiple baseline design across three groups of second grade students was employed. Across groups, students benefitted from the combined intervention of both instructional and motivational components. Individual performance suggested variability in responsiveness to treatment. Participants rated the combined treatment package more favorably than the instructional components in isolation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied School Psychology
Journal of Applied School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: With a new publisher (Taylor & Francis) and a new editor (David L. Wodrich), the Journal of Applied School Psychology will continue to publish articles and periodic thematic issues in 2009. Each submission should rest on either solid theoretical or empirical support and provide information that can be used in applied school settings, related educational systems, or community locations in which practitioners work. Manuscripts appropriate for publication in the journal will reflect psychological applications that pertain to individual students, groups of students, teachers, parents, and administrators. The journal also seeks, over time, novel and creative ways in which to disseminate information about practically sound and empirically supported school psychology practice.
期刊最新文献
Multidimensional Risk and Resilience Factors in Urban Youth with Unhealthy Weight Perceptions of Autistic and Nonautistic High School Students Regarding Factors That Impact Their Motivation to Be Academically Successful Universal Behavioral Screening: Inclusion of Student’s Trauma Symptoms and Hurricane Exposure The Effects of Fidget Spinners on Oral Reading Fluency Peer Victimization among Black Preschoolers: Roles of Emotion Knowledge, Teacher-Child Relationships, and Gender
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1