背景下的法律分析:《集会管理法》——对抗议权的阻碍?

IF 0.2 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ Pub Date : 2017-12-13 DOI:10.17159/2413-3108/2017/V0N62A3044
Jameelah Omar
{"title":"背景下的法律分析:《集会管理法》——对抗议权的阻碍?","authors":"Jameelah Omar","doi":"10.17159/2413-3108/2017/V0N62A3044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nSouth Africa has seen a groundswell of protests in the past few years. The number of arrests during protest action has likewise increased. In June 2017 the Social Justice Coalition (SJC) challenged the constitutionality of the Regulation of Gatherings Act 205 of 1993 in the Western Cape High Court. This was an appeal from the magistrates’ court in which 21 members of the SJC were convicted of contravening the Regulation of Gatherings Act for failing to provide notice. This is the first court challenge to the constitutionality of the Regulation of Gatherings Act. Although the challenge was brought on restricted grounds, it highlights the Regulation of Gatherings Act as a sharp point of controversy. This article will consider the regulatory provisions and the extent to which they restrict the constitutional right to protest, particularly in light of the important role played by protest in South Africa’s constitutional democracy.","PeriodicalId":54100,"journal":{"name":"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A legal analysis in context: The Regulation of Gatherings Act – a hindrance to the right to protest?\",\"authors\":\"Jameelah Omar\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2413-3108/2017/V0N62A3044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nSouth Africa has seen a groundswell of protests in the past few years. The number of arrests during protest action has likewise increased. In June 2017 the Social Justice Coalition (SJC) challenged the constitutionality of the Regulation of Gatherings Act 205 of 1993 in the Western Cape High Court. This was an appeal from the magistrates’ court in which 21 members of the SJC were convicted of contravening the Regulation of Gatherings Act for failing to provide notice. This is the first court challenge to the constitutionality of the Regulation of Gatherings Act. Although the challenge was brought on restricted grounds, it highlights the Regulation of Gatherings Act as a sharp point of controversy. This article will consider the regulatory provisions and the extent to which they restrict the constitutional right to protest, particularly in light of the important role played by protest in South Africa’s constitutional democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2017/V0N62A3044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3108/2017/V0N62A3044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的几年里,南非的抗议活动愈演愈烈。在抗议活动中被捕的人数也有所增加。2017年6月,社会正义联盟(SJC)在西开普省高等法院对1993年第205号《集会管理法》的合宪性提出质疑。这是治安法院的上诉,21名SJC成员因未提供通知而被判违反《集会条例法》。这是法院首次对《集会管理法》的合宪性提出质疑。尽管这一挑战是基于有限的理由提出的,但它强调了《集会管理法》是一个尖锐的争议点。本条将考虑监管条款及其对宪法规定的抗议权的限制程度,特别是考虑到抗议在南非宪政民主中发挥的重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A legal analysis in context: The Regulation of Gatherings Act – a hindrance to the right to protest?
  South Africa has seen a groundswell of protests in the past few years. The number of arrests during protest action has likewise increased. In June 2017 the Social Justice Coalition (SJC) challenged the constitutionality of the Regulation of Gatherings Act 205 of 1993 in the Western Cape High Court. This was an appeal from the magistrates’ court in which 21 members of the SJC were convicted of contravening the Regulation of Gatherings Act for failing to provide notice. This is the first court challenge to the constitutionality of the Regulation of Gatherings Act. Although the challenge was brought on restricted grounds, it highlights the Regulation of Gatherings Act as a sharp point of controversy. This article will consider the regulatory provisions and the extent to which they restrict the constitutional right to protest, particularly in light of the important role played by protest in South Africa’s constitutional democracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ
South African Crime Quarterly-SACQ CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Progressive or regressive rape case law? Tshabalala v S; Ntuli v S 2020 2 SACR 38 CC Combatting violence against African foreign nationals: A criminological approach towards community safety in the KwaZulu-Natal province of South Africa Keeping them out of prison: A restorative justice education intervention with prison inmates in Lesotho ‘Bad, sad and angry’: Responses of the SAPS leadership to the dangers of policing Understanding crime using GIS and the context of COVID-19: the case of Saldanha Bay Municipality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1