新冠肺炎、精神支持与反思实践

Q1 Arts and Humanities Health and Social Care Chaplaincy Pub Date : 2021-02-10 DOI:10.1558/HSCC.42733
Lindsay. B. Carey
{"title":"新冠肺炎、精神支持与反思实践","authors":"Lindsay. B. Carey","doi":"10.1558/HSCC.42733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three important areas are covered in this issue of HSCC: (i) COVID-19, (ii) spiritual support and (iii) reflective practice – all fundamental to the future of chaplaincy. It is important to note that various formal research methodologies (whether quantitative or qualitative) are utilized across all three areas in this issue, and all are indicative of the changing nature of chaplaincy increasing its evidence-based practice. Indeed, the emphasis on evidenced-based practice within chaplaincy has become considerable since the turn of the twenty-first century. This is particularly important given the previous humanistic models (i.e. biomedical, bio-psychological, bio-psychosocial), which have mostly (whether deliberately or subconsciously) avoided or opposed the inclusion of religious or spiritual care within health and social care contexts due to the lack of empirical evidence. This century seems to be advancing with an increased recognition of the need for a more truly holistic approach to health and well-being; namely, the utilization of the bio-psychosocial-spiritual model of care (Sulmasy, 2002), which intentionally encourages religion and spirituality research, and the encompassing of those from any faith and those with non-religious belief systems. The bio-psychosocial-spiritual model is also increasingly important for ensuring that there is appropriate religious/spiritual care for future","PeriodicalId":37483,"journal":{"name":"Health and Social Care Chaplaincy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19, Spiritual Support and Reflective Practice\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay. B. Carey\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/HSCC.42733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three important areas are covered in this issue of HSCC: (i) COVID-19, (ii) spiritual support and (iii) reflective practice – all fundamental to the future of chaplaincy. It is important to note that various formal research methodologies (whether quantitative or qualitative) are utilized across all three areas in this issue, and all are indicative of the changing nature of chaplaincy increasing its evidence-based practice. Indeed, the emphasis on evidenced-based practice within chaplaincy has become considerable since the turn of the twenty-first century. This is particularly important given the previous humanistic models (i.e. biomedical, bio-psychological, bio-psychosocial), which have mostly (whether deliberately or subconsciously) avoided or opposed the inclusion of religious or spiritual care within health and social care contexts due to the lack of empirical evidence. This century seems to be advancing with an increased recognition of the need for a more truly holistic approach to health and well-being; namely, the utilization of the bio-psychosocial-spiritual model of care (Sulmasy, 2002), which intentionally encourages religion and spirituality research, and the encompassing of those from any faith and those with non-religious belief systems. The bio-psychosocial-spiritual model is also increasingly important for ensuring that there is appropriate religious/spiritual care for future\",\"PeriodicalId\":37483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health and Social Care Chaplaincy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health and Social Care Chaplaincy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/HSCC.42733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and Social Care Chaplaincy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/HSCC.42733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本期HSCC涵盖了三个重要领域:(i)新冠肺炎,(ii)精神支持和(iii)反思实践——所有这些都是牧师未来的基础。值得注意的是,在这一问题的所有三个领域都使用了各种正式的研究方法(无论是定量的还是定性的),所有这些都表明牧师身份的性质在变化,增加了其循证实践。事实上,自21世纪之交以来,牧师内部对循证实践的重视程度已经相当高。考虑到以前的人文主义模式(即生物医学、生物心理学、生物心理社会学),这一点尤为重要,因为缺乏经验证据,这些模式大多(无论是有意还是潜意识)避免或反对将宗教或精神护理纳入健康和社会护理环境。本世纪似乎在前进,人们越来越认识到需要对健康和福祉采取更全面的方法;即利用生物-心理-精神护理模式(Sulmasy,2002),该模式有意鼓励宗教和精神研究,并将任何信仰的人和非宗教信仰系统的人纳入其中。生物-心理-精神模式对于确保未来有适当的宗教/精神护理也越来越重要
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19, Spiritual Support and Reflective Practice
Three important areas are covered in this issue of HSCC: (i) COVID-19, (ii) spiritual support and (iii) reflective practice – all fundamental to the future of chaplaincy. It is important to note that various formal research methodologies (whether quantitative or qualitative) are utilized across all three areas in this issue, and all are indicative of the changing nature of chaplaincy increasing its evidence-based practice. Indeed, the emphasis on evidenced-based practice within chaplaincy has become considerable since the turn of the twenty-first century. This is particularly important given the previous humanistic models (i.e. biomedical, bio-psychological, bio-psychosocial), which have mostly (whether deliberately or subconsciously) avoided or opposed the inclusion of religious or spiritual care within health and social care contexts due to the lack of empirical evidence. This century seems to be advancing with an increased recognition of the need for a more truly holistic approach to health and well-being; namely, the utilization of the bio-psychosocial-spiritual model of care (Sulmasy, 2002), which intentionally encourages religion and spirituality research, and the encompassing of those from any faith and those with non-religious belief systems. The bio-psychosocial-spiritual model is also increasingly important for ensuring that there is appropriate religious/spiritual care for future
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health and Social Care Chaplaincy
Health and Social Care Chaplaincy Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care Chaplaincy is a peer-reviewed, international journal that assists health and social care chaplains to explore the art and science of spiritual care within a variety of contexts. The journal was founded in 2013 through the merger of the Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy (issn:1748-801X) and the Scottish Journal of Healthcare Chaplaincy (issn:1463-9920) . It continues to be the official journal of the College of Health Care Chaplains and members of the society receive the journal as part of their annual membership. For more details on membership subscriptions, please click on the ''members'' button at the top of this page. Back issues of both previous journals are being loaded onto this website (see Archives) and online access to these back issues is included in all institutional subscriptions. Health and Social Care Chaplaincy is a multidisciplinary forum for the discussion of a range of issues related to the delivery of spiritual care across various settings: acute, paediatric, mental health, palliative care and community. It encourages a creative collaboration and interface between health and social care practitioners in the UK and internationally and consolidates different traditions of discourse and communication research in its commitment to an understanding of psychosocial, cultural and ethical aspects of healthcare in contemporary societies. It is responsive to both ecumenical and interfaith agendas as well as those from a humanist perspective.
期刊最新文献
Shining a Light in COVID-19 Darkness Roberts, S. B., and Dunlop, S. (Eds.) (2022). Chaplaincy and Practical Theology: Researching a Pioneering Ministry Working on the Clinical Frontline During the COVID-19 Pandemic Nolan, S., and Damen, A. (Eds.) (2021). Transforming Chaplaincy: The George Fitchett Reader Weiner, J. (2022). Care and Covenant: A Jewish Bioethic of Responsibility
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1