世界秩序理念

Q2 Arts and Humanities Philosophia Reformata Pub Date : 2018-11-14 DOI:10.1163/23528230-08302003
D. Strauss
{"title":"世界秩序理念","authors":"D. Strauss","doi":"10.1163/23528230-08302003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dooyeweerd was struck by the fact that different systems of philosophy expressly oriented their philosophic thought to the idea of a divine world order. The dialectic of form and matter permeated both Greek and medieval philosophy. The distinction between natural laws and laws of nature is highlighted with reference to Descartes and Beeckman. A key distinction for an understanding of the order of the world is given in the difference between modal laws and type laws. In order to substantiate this claim, an explication of the nature of the order for the world has to explore elements derived from the four most basic modes of explanation: number (the one and the many), space (universality), the kinematic (constancy), and the physical aspect (change). These points of entry serve theoretical thought with terms that may either be employed in a conceptual way or in a concept-transcending way. The influence of nominalism on the thought of Dooyeweerd is analyzed in some more detail.","PeriodicalId":38515,"journal":{"name":"Philosophia Reformata","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23528230-08302003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Idea of a World Order\",\"authors\":\"D. Strauss\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/23528230-08302003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dooyeweerd was struck by the fact that different systems of philosophy expressly oriented their philosophic thought to the idea of a divine world order. The dialectic of form and matter permeated both Greek and medieval philosophy. The distinction between natural laws and laws of nature is highlighted with reference to Descartes and Beeckman. A key distinction for an understanding of the order of the world is given in the difference between modal laws and type laws. In order to substantiate this claim, an explication of the nature of the order for the world has to explore elements derived from the four most basic modes of explanation: number (the one and the many), space (universality), the kinematic (constancy), and the physical aspect (change). These points of entry serve theoretical thought with terms that may either be employed in a conceptual way or in a concept-transcending way. The influence of nominalism on the thought of Dooyeweerd is analyzed in some more detail.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophia Reformata\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/23528230-08302003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophia Reformata\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/23528230-08302003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophia Reformata","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/23528230-08302003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Dooyeweed感到震惊的是,不同的哲学体系明确地将他们的哲学思想导向了神圣世界秩序的理念。形式和物质的辩证法渗透到希腊和中世纪哲学中。自然规律和自然规律之间的区别是通过参考笛卡尔和贝克曼来强调的。理解世界秩序的一个关键区别在于模态律和类型律之间的区别。为了证实这一说法,对世界秩序性质的解释必须探索从四种最基本的解释模式中得出的元素:数字(一和多)、空间(普遍性)、运动学(恒定性)和物理方面(变化)。这些切入点为理论思维提供了术语,这些术语既可以以概念的方式使用,也可以以概念超越的方式使用。更详细地分析了唯名论对杜耶维德思想的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Idea of a World Order
Dooyeweerd was struck by the fact that different systems of philosophy expressly oriented their philosophic thought to the idea of a divine world order. The dialectic of form and matter permeated both Greek and medieval philosophy. The distinction between natural laws and laws of nature is highlighted with reference to Descartes and Beeckman. A key distinction for an understanding of the order of the world is given in the difference between modal laws and type laws. In order to substantiate this claim, an explication of the nature of the order for the world has to explore elements derived from the four most basic modes of explanation: number (the one and the many), space (universality), the kinematic (constancy), and the physical aspect (change). These points of entry serve theoretical thought with terms that may either be employed in a conceptual way or in a concept-transcending way. The influence of nominalism on the thought of Dooyeweerd is analyzed in some more detail.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophia Reformata
Philosophia Reformata Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Zuidervaart and Dooyeweerd: A Critical Retrieval? A Review Essay of Shattering Silos: Reimagining Knowledge, Politics, and Social Critique by Lambert Zuidervaart Navigating Post modern Theology: Insights from Jean-Luc Marion and Gianni Vattimo’s Philosophy, written by Michael J. McGravey Neurowaves: Brain, Time, and Consciousness, written by Georg Northoff Dancing in the Wild Spaces of Love: A Theopoetics of Gift and Call, Risk and Promise, written by James H. Olthuis Het onbehagen van juf Ank: Over veiligheid en vertrouwen in roerige tijden, written by Ronald van Steden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1