基于火用的风机效率评估与等熵效率

IF 1.3 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power Pub Date : 2023-02-06 DOI:10.3390/ijtpp8010004
Johannes Brötz, C. Schänzle, P. Pelz
{"title":"基于火用的风机效率评估与等熵效率","authors":"Johannes Brötz, C. Schänzle, P. Pelz","doi":"10.3390/ijtpp8010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficiency definition allows us to compare two machines with each other. In general, the efficiency is defined as the ratio of usable power to the required power. This raises the question: what is the usable power? Most engineers discuss efficiency on the basis of the energy balance, i.e., the first law of thermodynamics. In this paper, we derive the exegetic efficiency taking the second law of thermodynamics into account. Exergy analysis takes into account work and heat and is able to model reality very accurately. On this basis, a comparison between the isentropic and exergetic efficiencies is given. A high-pressure radial fan is used as an example, and the differences are discussed. Therefore, measurements of a non-adiabatic fan are evaluated, and the role of the heat flux in the environment is discussed. The investigations show that a relevant difference between the isentropic and exergetic efficiencies becomes apparent in the partial-load range with high-pressure build-up. The thermal energy contained in the flow belongs proportionally to the exergy, i.e., the working capacity of the gas relative to its environment. For a standard such as ISO 5801 “Fans—Performance testing using standardized airways”, the efficiency must not only be physically correct, it must also be simple and practical. Against this background, the outlook of this paper discusses when and which efficiency definition is appropriate and best suited for a standard.","PeriodicalId":36626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exergy-Based Efficiency Assessment of Fans vs. Isentropic Efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Johannes Brötz, C. Schänzle, P. Pelz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ijtpp8010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The efficiency definition allows us to compare two machines with each other. In general, the efficiency is defined as the ratio of usable power to the required power. This raises the question: what is the usable power? Most engineers discuss efficiency on the basis of the energy balance, i.e., the first law of thermodynamics. In this paper, we derive the exegetic efficiency taking the second law of thermodynamics into account. Exergy analysis takes into account work and heat and is able to model reality very accurately. On this basis, a comparison between the isentropic and exergetic efficiencies is given. A high-pressure radial fan is used as an example, and the differences are discussed. Therefore, measurements of a non-adiabatic fan are evaluated, and the role of the heat flux in the environment is discussed. The investigations show that a relevant difference between the isentropic and exergetic efficiencies becomes apparent in the partial-load range with high-pressure build-up. The thermal energy contained in the flow belongs proportionally to the exergy, i.e., the working capacity of the gas relative to its environment. For a standard such as ISO 5801 “Fans—Performance testing using standardized airways”, the efficiency must not only be physically correct, it must also be simple and practical. Against this background, the outlook of this paper discusses when and which efficiency definition is appropriate and best suited for a standard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp8010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Turbomachinery, Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ijtpp8010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

效率的定义允许我们将两台机器相互比较。通常,效率被定义为可用功率与所需功率的比率。这就提出了一个问题:可用功率是多少?大多数工程师在能量平衡的基础上讨论效率,即热力学第一定律。本文在考虑热力学第二定律的情况下,导出了解算效率。火用分析考虑了功和热,能够非常准确地模拟现实。在此基础上,对等熵效率和做功效率进行了比较。以高压径向风机为例,讨论了其区别。因此,对非绝热风扇的测量结果进行了评估,并讨论了热通量在环境中的作用。研究表明,在高压积聚的部分负荷范围内,等熵效率和做功效率之间的相关差异变得明显。气流中包含的热能与火用成比例,即气体相对于其环境的工作能力。对于ISO 5801“风扇——使用标准气道进行性能测试”这样的标准,效率不仅必须在物理上正确,而且必须简单实用。在这种背景下,本文的展望讨论了何时以及哪种效率定义是合适的,并且最适合标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exergy-Based Efficiency Assessment of Fans vs. Isentropic Efficiency
The efficiency definition allows us to compare two machines with each other. In general, the efficiency is defined as the ratio of usable power to the required power. This raises the question: what is the usable power? Most engineers discuss efficiency on the basis of the energy balance, i.e., the first law of thermodynamics. In this paper, we derive the exegetic efficiency taking the second law of thermodynamics into account. Exergy analysis takes into account work and heat and is able to model reality very accurately. On this basis, a comparison between the isentropic and exergetic efficiencies is given. A high-pressure radial fan is used as an example, and the differences are discussed. Therefore, measurements of a non-adiabatic fan are evaluated, and the role of the heat flux in the environment is discussed. The investigations show that a relevant difference between the isentropic and exergetic efficiencies becomes apparent in the partial-load range with high-pressure build-up. The thermal energy contained in the flow belongs proportionally to the exergy, i.e., the working capacity of the gas relative to its environment. For a standard such as ISO 5801 “Fans—Performance testing using standardized airways”, the efficiency must not only be physically correct, it must also be simple and practical. Against this background, the outlook of this paper discusses when and which efficiency definition is appropriate and best suited for a standard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
21.40%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Turbofan Performance Estimation Using Neural Network Component Maps and Genetic Algorithm-Least Squares Solvers Experimental Investigation of an Efficient and Lightweight Designed Counter-Rotating Shrouded Fan Stage Experimental Investigation of the Sensitivity of Forced Response to Cold Streaks in an Axial Turbine Heat Load Development and Heat Map Sensitivity Analysis for Civil Aero-Engines Numerical Investigation of Forced Response in a Transonic Compressor Stage—Highlighting Challenges Using Experimental Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1