急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无血流的发生率和转归

G. Datta
{"title":"急性心肌梗死经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无血流的发生率和转归","authors":"G. Datta","doi":"10.29328/journal.jccm.1001102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nBackground: Mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) \nis the most effective treatment modality in ST-segment elevation myocardial \ninfarction (STEMI).No flow occurs in ∼8.8-10% of cases of primary \npercutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in STEMI patients. Our aim was to study     \nactual incidence and outcome of no flow patients. \nMethods: Five hundred and eighty primary PCI patients \nwere studied over a period of two years i.e. January 2016 to December 2017. \nDrug eluting stents were used in all cases. Majority of our patients(>90%) came  6 \nhours  after onset of chest pain. There were many patients where there was  \nno flow even after mechanical thrombus aspiration and pharmacological \nvasodilator therapy. We have studied primary outcome(mortality) of no flow in \nthose patients.                                                                                                                 \nResults: There were 44 cases of  no flow in our \nseries(7.75%). Left anterior descending artery(LAD )was involved in eighteen \npatients. Right coronary artery(RCA) was culprit in twenty four cases. Only \ntwo cases were seen in LCX territory. One month mortality rate in no flow group \nwas 50% and 6.25% in successful recanalization group. One year mortality was \n12.5% in successful recanalization group and 66% in no flow group. \nConclusion: Refractory no flow during primary PCI in STEMI is associated \nwith high mortality and morbidity. There is no established strategy to solve \nthis phenomenon. \n  \n ","PeriodicalId":32916,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction\",\"authors\":\"G. Datta\",\"doi\":\"10.29328/journal.jccm.1001102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nBackground: Mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) \\nis the most effective treatment modality in ST-segment elevation myocardial \\ninfarction (STEMI).No flow occurs in ∼8.8-10% of cases of primary \\npercutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in STEMI patients. Our aim was to study     \\nactual incidence and outcome of no flow patients. \\nMethods: Five hundred and eighty primary PCI patients \\nwere studied over a period of two years i.e. January 2016 to December 2017. \\nDrug eluting stents were used in all cases. Majority of our patients(>90%) came  6 \\nhours  after onset of chest pain. There were many patients where there was  \\nno flow even after mechanical thrombus aspiration and pharmacological \\nvasodilator therapy. We have studied primary outcome(mortality) of no flow in \\nthose patients.                                                                                                                 \\nResults: There were 44 cases of  no flow in our \\nseries(7.75%). Left anterior descending artery(LAD )was involved in eighteen \\npatients. Right coronary artery(RCA) was culprit in twenty four cases. Only \\ntwo cases were seen in LCX territory. One month mortality rate in no flow group \\nwas 50% and 6.25% in successful recanalization group. One year mortality was \\n12.5% in successful recanalization group and 66% in no flow group. \\nConclusion: Refractory no flow during primary PCI in STEMI is associated \\nwith high mortality and morbidity. There is no established strategy to solve \\nthis phenomenon. \\n  \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":32916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jccm.1001102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kardiologi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jccm.1001102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:梗死相关动脉(IRA)的机械血运重建是ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)最有效的治疗方式。在STEMI患者中,约8.8-10%的初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)病例没有发生血流。我们的目的是研究无血流患者的实际发病率和结果。方法:对580名原发性PCI患者进行为期两年的研究,即2016年1月至2017年12月。所有病例均使用药物洗脱支架。我们的大多数患者(>90%)出现在胸痛发作后6小时。许多患者即使在机械血栓抽吸和药物血管舒张治疗后也没有血流。我们研究了这些患者无血流的主要转归(死亡率)。结果:本组44例(7.75%)无血流,18例左前降支受累。在24例病例中,右冠状动脉(RCA)是罪魁祸首。LCX地区仅发现两例病例。无血流组1个月死亡率为50%,再通成功组为6.25%。再通成功组一年死亡率为12.5%,无血流组为66%。结论:STEMI经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间顽固性无血流与高死亡率和高发病率相关。目前还没有解决这一现象的既定战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Incidence and outcome of no flow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction
  Background: Mechanical revascularization of the infarct-related artery (IRA) is the most effective treatment modality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).No flow occurs in ∼8.8-10% of cases of primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) in STEMI patients. Our aim was to study     actual incidence and outcome of no flow patients. Methods: Five hundred and eighty primary PCI patients were studied over a period of two years i.e. January 2016 to December 2017. Drug eluting stents were used in all cases. Majority of our patients(>90%) came  6 hours  after onset of chest pain. There were many patients where there was  no flow even after mechanical thrombus aspiration and pharmacological vasodilator therapy. We have studied primary outcome(mortality) of no flow in those patients.                                                                                                                 Results: There were 44 cases of  no flow in our series(7.75%). Left anterior descending artery(LAD )was involved in eighteen patients. Right coronary artery(RCA) was culprit in twenty four cases. Only two cases were seen in LCX territory. One month mortality rate in no flow group was 50% and 6.25% in successful recanalization group. One year mortality was 12.5% in successful recanalization group and 66% in no flow group. Conclusion: Refractory no flow during primary PCI in STEMI is associated with high mortality and morbidity. There is no established strategy to solve this phenomenon.    
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Case Reports/Series Research Articles Reviews The Importance of Hyperthyroid Screening in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Persistent Tachycardia Despite Optimal Decongestion: A Case Report Does Chronic Inflammation Play a Role in Rheumatic Mitral Valve Restenosis after Percutaneous Transvenous Mitral Commissurotomy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1