森林边缘的类型决定了不同大小地甲虫的空间分布

IF 0.6 4区 生物学 Q4 ZOOLOGY Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Pub Date : 2020-12-28 DOI:10.17109/azh.66.suppl.69.2020
T. Magura, G. Lövei
{"title":"森林边缘的类型决定了不同大小地甲虫的空间分布","authors":"T. Magura, G. Lövei","doi":"10.17109/azh.66.suppl.69.2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide human-induced habitat fragmentation intensifies the emergence of forest edges. In addition to these edges, there are edges evolved by natural processes. Edge-maintaining processes (natural vs. anthropogenic) fundamentally determine edge responses, and thus edge functions. Species with various traits show fundamentally different edge response, therefore the trait-based approach is essential in edge studies. We evaluated the edge effect on the body size of ground beetles in forest edges with various maintaining processes. Our results, based on 30 published papers and 221 species, showed that natural forest edges were impenetrable for small species, preventing their dispersal into the forest interiors, while both the medium and the large species penetrated across these edges and dispersed into the forest interiors. Anthropogenic edges maintained by continued human disturbance (agriculture, forestry, urbanisation) were permeable for ground beetles of all size, allowing them to invade the forest interiors. Overwintering type (overwintering as adults or as larvae) was associated with body size, since almost two-thirds of the small species, while slightly more than a third of both the medium and the large species were adult overwintering. Based on this, size-dependent permeability of natural edges may be related to overwintering type, which basically determines species tolerance to human disturbance.","PeriodicalId":55558,"journal":{"name":"Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","volume":"66 1","pages":"69-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The type of forest edge governs the spatial distribution of different-sized ground beetles\",\"authors\":\"T. Magura, G. Lövei\",\"doi\":\"10.17109/azh.66.suppl.69.2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Worldwide human-induced habitat fragmentation intensifies the emergence of forest edges. In addition to these edges, there are edges evolved by natural processes. Edge-maintaining processes (natural vs. anthropogenic) fundamentally determine edge responses, and thus edge functions. Species with various traits show fundamentally different edge response, therefore the trait-based approach is essential in edge studies. We evaluated the edge effect on the body size of ground beetles in forest edges with various maintaining processes. Our results, based on 30 published papers and 221 species, showed that natural forest edges were impenetrable for small species, preventing their dispersal into the forest interiors, while both the medium and the large species penetrated across these edges and dispersed into the forest interiors. Anthropogenic edges maintained by continued human disturbance (agriculture, forestry, urbanisation) were permeable for ground beetles of all size, allowing them to invade the forest interiors. Overwintering type (overwintering as adults or as larvae) was associated with body size, since almost two-thirds of the small species, while slightly more than a third of both the medium and the large species were adult overwintering. Based on this, size-dependent permeability of natural edges may be related to overwintering type, which basically determines species tolerance to human disturbance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"69-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17109/azh.66.suppl.69.2020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17109/azh.66.suppl.69.2020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

世界范围内人类造成的栖息地破碎化加剧了森林边缘的出现。除了这些边缘之外,还有通过自然过程进化而来的边缘。边缘维持过程(自然与人为)从根本上决定了边缘响应,从而决定了边缘函数。具有不同特征的物种表现出根本不同的边缘反应,因此基于特征的方法在边缘研究中至关重要。我们评估了不同养护过程对森林边缘地甲虫体型的边缘影响。我们基于30篇已发表的论文和221个物种的研究结果表明,小物种无法穿透天然森林边缘,阻止了它们扩散到森林内部,而中型和大型物种都穿透了这些边缘,并扩散到了森林内部。由持续的人类干扰(农业、林业、城市化)维持的人为边缘对各种大小的地甲虫都是可渗透的,使它们能够入侵森林内部。越冬类型(成虫或幼虫越冬)与体型有关,因为几乎三分之二的小型物种,而略多于三分之一的中型和大型物种都是成虫越冬。基于此,天然边缘的大小依赖性渗透性可能与越冬类型有关,这基本上决定了物种对人类干扰的耐受性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The type of forest edge governs the spatial distribution of different-sized ground beetles
Worldwide human-induced habitat fragmentation intensifies the emergence of forest edges. In addition to these edges, there are edges evolved by natural processes. Edge-maintaining processes (natural vs. anthropogenic) fundamentally determine edge responses, and thus edge functions. Species with various traits show fundamentally different edge response, therefore the trait-based approach is essential in edge studies. We evaluated the edge effect on the body size of ground beetles in forest edges with various maintaining processes. Our results, based on 30 published papers and 221 species, showed that natural forest edges were impenetrable for small species, preventing their dispersal into the forest interiors, while both the medium and the large species penetrated across these edges and dispersed into the forest interiors. Anthropogenic edges maintained by continued human disturbance (agriculture, forestry, urbanisation) were permeable for ground beetles of all size, allowing them to invade the forest interiors. Overwintering type (overwintering as adults or as larvae) was associated with body size, since almost two-thirds of the small species, while slightly more than a third of both the medium and the large species were adult overwintering. Based on this, size-dependent permeability of natural edges may be related to overwintering type, which basically determines species tolerance to human disturbance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae publishes original works in the fields of animal taxonomy and systematics, zoogeography, animal ecology and behaviour, population biology, biodiversity studies and nature conservation problems of international interest. Short communications, check lists, catalogues or new species records for a given region are not in focus of the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
New faunistic and taxonomic data on oribatid mites (Acari: Oribatida) of Mexico New genus and new species of the subfamily Colpopterinae (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Nogodinidae) from Colombia Two new Chelonocoris species from Borneo and Sumatra (Hemiptera, Heteroptera, Aradidae) Improving the method of lens mass preparation for age assessment in the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) A new species of the planthopper genus Polychornum Gnezdilov, 2021 (Hemiptera: Caliscelidae: Ommatidiotinae) extends the distribution of the genus and tribe Augilini Baker to Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1