基于特征应变的均匀喷丸铝板向轧制方向弯曲的原因分析

IF 1.8 3区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING Strain Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.1111/str.12451
Hong Yan Miao, M. Lévesque, F. Gosselin
{"title":"基于特征应变的均匀喷丸铝板向轧制方向弯曲的原因分析","authors":"Hong Yan Miao, M. Lévesque, F. Gosselin","doi":"10.1111/str.12451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Shot peen forming is a process widely used to shape aircraft components such as wing skins, yet its fundamental working is still crudely understood. It is understood that a light conventional peen forming treatment applied uniformly over an initially flat plate will induce isotropic in‐plane stretching of the surface layer and will thus lead to a panel curving with identical curvatures in all directions. However, [1] made the startling observation that uniformly peen formed aluminium plates of different aspect ratios all bent along their laminating direction irrespective of the peening direction. This experimental result is counterintuitive because the residual stresses due to the lamination process are 1 order to 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those induced by the shot peen forming treatment. In the present study, we apply the eigenstrain theory to estimate the effect of the different sources of anisotropy on uniformly peen formed aluminium plates. Potential sources of anisotropy included the plastic anisotropy of rolled aluminium, nonequibiaxial initial stresses that redistribute when their equilibrium is disturbed by peening, the geometry of the specimens and externally applied prestress. For the alloy and peening conditions considered, we show that plastic anisotropy had no discernible influence on the resulting shape of the peen formed specimens. Initial residual stresses, on the other hand, caused slightly larger bending loads in the rolling direction of the alloy. Although the magnitude of these loads was approximately 30 times smaller than peening‐induced loads, it was sufficient to overcome the geometric preference for rectangular sheets to bend along their long side and cause all unconstrained specimens to bend along the rolling direction instead. Our analysis highlights the importance of the history of the material that is being peened. Residual stresses already present in the part before peening must be considered to ensure good simulation predictions.","PeriodicalId":51176,"journal":{"name":"Strain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eigenstrain‐based analysis of why uniformly shot peened aluminium plates bend more in the rolling direction\",\"authors\":\"Hong Yan Miao, M. Lévesque, F. Gosselin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/str.12451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Shot peen forming is a process widely used to shape aircraft components such as wing skins, yet its fundamental working is still crudely understood. It is understood that a light conventional peen forming treatment applied uniformly over an initially flat plate will induce isotropic in‐plane stretching of the surface layer and will thus lead to a panel curving with identical curvatures in all directions. However, [1] made the startling observation that uniformly peen formed aluminium plates of different aspect ratios all bent along their laminating direction irrespective of the peening direction. This experimental result is counterintuitive because the residual stresses due to the lamination process are 1 order to 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those induced by the shot peen forming treatment. In the present study, we apply the eigenstrain theory to estimate the effect of the different sources of anisotropy on uniformly peen formed aluminium plates. Potential sources of anisotropy included the plastic anisotropy of rolled aluminium, nonequibiaxial initial stresses that redistribute when their equilibrium is disturbed by peening, the geometry of the specimens and externally applied prestress. For the alloy and peening conditions considered, we show that plastic anisotropy had no discernible influence on the resulting shape of the peen formed specimens. Initial residual stresses, on the other hand, caused slightly larger bending loads in the rolling direction of the alloy. Although the magnitude of these loads was approximately 30 times smaller than peening‐induced loads, it was sufficient to overcome the geometric preference for rectangular sheets to bend along their long side and cause all unconstrained specimens to bend along the rolling direction instead. Our analysis highlights the importance of the history of the material that is being peened. Residual stresses already present in the part before peening must be considered to ensure good simulation predictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12451\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strain","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/str.12451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eigenstrain‐based analysis of why uniformly shot peened aluminium plates bend more in the rolling direction
Shot peen forming is a process widely used to shape aircraft components such as wing skins, yet its fundamental working is still crudely understood. It is understood that a light conventional peen forming treatment applied uniformly over an initially flat plate will induce isotropic in‐plane stretching of the surface layer and will thus lead to a panel curving with identical curvatures in all directions. However, [1] made the startling observation that uniformly peen formed aluminium plates of different aspect ratios all bent along their laminating direction irrespective of the peening direction. This experimental result is counterintuitive because the residual stresses due to the lamination process are 1 order to 2 orders of magnitude smaller than those induced by the shot peen forming treatment. In the present study, we apply the eigenstrain theory to estimate the effect of the different sources of anisotropy on uniformly peen formed aluminium plates. Potential sources of anisotropy included the plastic anisotropy of rolled aluminium, nonequibiaxial initial stresses that redistribute when their equilibrium is disturbed by peening, the geometry of the specimens and externally applied prestress. For the alloy and peening conditions considered, we show that plastic anisotropy had no discernible influence on the resulting shape of the peen formed specimens. Initial residual stresses, on the other hand, caused slightly larger bending loads in the rolling direction of the alloy. Although the magnitude of these loads was approximately 30 times smaller than peening‐induced loads, it was sufficient to overcome the geometric preference for rectangular sheets to bend along their long side and cause all unconstrained specimens to bend along the rolling direction instead. Our analysis highlights the importance of the history of the material that is being peened. Residual stresses already present in the part before peening must be considered to ensure good simulation predictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strain
Strain 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Strain is an international journal that contains contributions from leading-edge research on the measurement of the mechanical behaviour of structures and systems. Strain only accepts contributions with sufficient novelty in the design, implementation, and/or validation of experimental methodologies to characterize materials, structures, and systems; i.e. contributions that are limited to the application of established methodologies are outside of the scope of the journal. The journal includes papers from all engineering disciplines that deal with material behaviour and degradation under load, structural design and measurement techniques. Although the thrust of the journal is experimental, numerical simulations and validation are included in the coverage. Strain welcomes papers that deal with novel work in the following areas: experimental techniques non-destructive evaluation techniques numerical analysis, simulation and validation residual stress measurement techniques design of composite structures and components impact behaviour of materials and structures signal and image processing transducer and sensor design structural health monitoring biomechanics extreme environment micro- and nano-scale testing method.
期刊最新文献
An artificial neural network for digital image correlation dynamic subset selection based on speckle pattern quality metrics A comparative study of Glinka and Neuber approaches for fatigue strength assessment on 42CrMoS4‐QT specimens Biaxial expansion due to compression experiments for measuring the failure strain of tubular samples On the use of an induced temperature gradient and full‐field measurements to investigate and model the thermomechanical behaviour of an austenitic stainless steel 316 Numerical and experimental investigation of the residual stress distribution of internal thread cold extrusion and tap wear
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1