减少Eclipse TPS中总监控单元的可行性方法

Kuo Li, You-jiu Zhang, Linlin Li, Cheng Li, Danqing Shen, Hu Rui
{"title":"减少Eclipse TPS中总监控单元的可行性方法","authors":"Kuo Li, You-jiu Zhang, Linlin Li, Cheng Li, Danqing Shen, Hu Rui","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4181.2019.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the feasibility of using the optimization parameters modification and optimization processes modification to reduce the total monitor units(MUs) in the Eclipse radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS). \n \n \nMethods \nBased on the radiotherapy plan of 10 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a total of 90 plans were designed for 9 groups using different optimization parameters and processes. The total MUs and the exposure dose of the organs among the different plans were compared. \n \n \nResults \nThere was no significant difference in the doses of the organs at risk (class I) under the premise of target dose requirements (all P>0.05). The increase of the weight of the target area and the organs at risk will increase the total MUs. The increase of the preset limit value of the minimum MUs in the subfield will reduce the total MUs. The increase of the fluence smoothness in the X and Y directions will increase the total MUs. An unreasonable minimum MU value will increase the total MUs. Under the condition that the organ exposure is not changed significantly, the influencing factors of MU are ranked as weight> fluence smoothness >minimum MUs. \n \n \nConclusions \nParameter setting and process planning can reduce the total MUs to a certain extent. However, due to the complexity of the influence of optimization parameters on the plan, the optimization process should be preferred. Especially in the Eclipse TPS, the method of gradual optimization to achieve the final dose distribution requirement and then remove the fluence re-optimization is more convenient and effective for reducing the total MUs. \n \n \nKey words: \nEclipse TPS; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Fluence; Monitor units","PeriodicalId":61751,"journal":{"name":"国际生物医学工程杂志","volume":"42 1","pages":"150-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility method for reducing the total monitor units in Eclipse TPS\",\"authors\":\"Kuo Li, You-jiu Zhang, Linlin Li, Cheng Li, Danqing Shen, Hu Rui\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4181.2019.02.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo explore the feasibility of using the optimization parameters modification and optimization processes modification to reduce the total monitor units(MUs) in the Eclipse radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS). \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nBased on the radiotherapy plan of 10 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a total of 90 plans were designed for 9 groups using different optimization parameters and processes. The total MUs and the exposure dose of the organs among the different plans were compared. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThere was no significant difference in the doses of the organs at risk (class I) under the premise of target dose requirements (all P>0.05). The increase of the weight of the target area and the organs at risk will increase the total MUs. The increase of the preset limit value of the minimum MUs in the subfield will reduce the total MUs. The increase of the fluence smoothness in the X and Y directions will increase the total MUs. An unreasonable minimum MU value will increase the total MUs. Under the condition that the organ exposure is not changed significantly, the influencing factors of MU are ranked as weight> fluence smoothness >minimum MUs. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nParameter setting and process planning can reduce the total MUs to a certain extent. However, due to the complexity of the influence of optimization parameters on the plan, the optimization process should be preferred. Especially in the Eclipse TPS, the method of gradual optimization to achieve the final dose distribution requirement and then remove the fluence re-optimization is more convenient and effective for reducing the total MUs. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nEclipse TPS; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Fluence; Monitor units\",\"PeriodicalId\":61751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"国际生物医学工程杂志\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"150-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"国际生物医学工程杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4181.2019.02.011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"国际生物医学工程杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1673-4181.2019.02.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨在Eclipse放疗计划系统(TPS)中使用优化参数修改和优化流程修改来减少总监测单元(MU)的可行性。方法根据10例鼻咽癌患者的放疗方案,采用不同的优化参数和工艺,设计了9组共90个方案。比较不同方案的总MUs和器官暴露剂量。结果在目标剂量要求的前提下,危险器官(I类)的剂量无显著差异(均P>0.05)。目标区域和危险器官重量的增加将增加总MU。子字段中最小MU的预设极限值的增加将减少总MU。X和Y方向上通量平滑度的增加将增加总MU。不合理的最小MU值将增加总MU。在器官暴露不发生显著变化的情况下,MU的影响因素依次为权重>通量平滑度>最小MU。结论参数设置和工艺规划可以在一定程度上降低MU总量。然而,由于优化参数对计划影响的复杂性,应优先选择优化过程。特别是在Eclipse TPS中,逐步优化以达到最终剂量分布要求,然后去除通量重新优化的方法对于减少总MU更方便有效。关键词:Eclipse TPS;鼻咽癌;流利;监视器单元
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility method for reducing the total monitor units in Eclipse TPS
Objective To explore the feasibility of using the optimization parameters modification and optimization processes modification to reduce the total monitor units(MUs) in the Eclipse radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS). Methods Based on the radiotherapy plan of 10 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a total of 90 plans were designed for 9 groups using different optimization parameters and processes. The total MUs and the exposure dose of the organs among the different plans were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the doses of the organs at risk (class I) under the premise of target dose requirements (all P>0.05). The increase of the weight of the target area and the organs at risk will increase the total MUs. The increase of the preset limit value of the minimum MUs in the subfield will reduce the total MUs. The increase of the fluence smoothness in the X and Y directions will increase the total MUs. An unreasonable minimum MU value will increase the total MUs. Under the condition that the organ exposure is not changed significantly, the influencing factors of MU are ranked as weight> fluence smoothness >minimum MUs. Conclusions Parameter setting and process planning can reduce the total MUs to a certain extent. However, due to the complexity of the influence of optimization parameters on the plan, the optimization process should be preferred. Especially in the Eclipse TPS, the method of gradual optimization to achieve the final dose distribution requirement and then remove the fluence re-optimization is more convenient and effective for reducing the total MUs. Key words: Eclipse TPS; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Fluence; Monitor units
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1974
期刊最新文献
Ureteroscopy under conscious sedation: A proof-of-concept study. A Study on Assessment of Depression, Anxiety and Stress among South Indian Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic Study on Antiviral Activities of Glycyrrhizin Improving Clinical Teaching of Fourth Year Anaesthesia Students: The Case of Wolaita Sodo University Hearing Aids of the Future: A Simulation Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1