降水对内蒙古两阶段草地生态补贴政策减载效应的影响

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Grassland Science Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1111/grs.12370
Jiayu Dong, Xinling Zhang, Xiaoling Liu, Zimeng Ren
{"title":"降水对内蒙古两阶段草地生态补贴政策减载效应的影响","authors":"Jiayu Dong,&nbsp;Xinling Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoling Liu,&nbsp;Zimeng Ren","doi":"10.1111/grs.12370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>China launched the Grassland Ecological Subsidy Policy in 2011 for restoring grassland ecology by paying pastoralists to downsize stocking on the degraded grasslands and compensate their income loss from livestock reduction. The policy, the largest payment for ecosystem services program targeting pastoralism in the world, has been so far through two 5-year stages: 2011 to 2015 with a subsidy at 1.5 CNY per standard <i>mu</i> per year and 2016 to 2020 at 2.5 CNY increased to boost the stocking reduction. How was the boost effect? We investigated that stocking responses in 2010, 2015 and 2018 using the panel data of 410 herder households in the subpolicy forage-livestock balance areas in Inner Mongolia, China, tested various attributes on stocking rate and stocking reduction rate at the two stages of the policy using econometric models of random effects and ordinary least squares. This study is the first empirical case containing the two 5-year policy data and with both subsidy and precipitation effects. We confirmed the regulating impact of precipitation on the subsidy policy effect, and more precipitation in the second stage appeared to offset the effect of the increased subsidy. We suggested changing the subsidy targeting mechanism from rewarding stocking reduction to direct grassland restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":56078,"journal":{"name":"Grassland Science","volume":"68 4","pages":"383-397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grs.12370","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of precipitation on the two-stage grassland eco-subsidy policy effect on stocking reduction in Inner Mongolia, China\",\"authors\":\"Jiayu Dong,&nbsp;Xinling Zhang,&nbsp;Xiaoling Liu,&nbsp;Zimeng Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/grs.12370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>China launched the Grassland Ecological Subsidy Policy in 2011 for restoring grassland ecology by paying pastoralists to downsize stocking on the degraded grasslands and compensate their income loss from livestock reduction. The policy, the largest payment for ecosystem services program targeting pastoralism in the world, has been so far through two 5-year stages: 2011 to 2015 with a subsidy at 1.5 CNY per standard <i>mu</i> per year and 2016 to 2020 at 2.5 CNY increased to boost the stocking reduction. How was the boost effect? We investigated that stocking responses in 2010, 2015 and 2018 using the panel data of 410 herder households in the subpolicy forage-livestock balance areas in Inner Mongolia, China, tested various attributes on stocking rate and stocking reduction rate at the two stages of the policy using econometric models of random effects and ordinary least squares. This study is the first empirical case containing the two 5-year policy data and with both subsidy and precipitation effects. We confirmed the regulating impact of precipitation on the subsidy policy effect, and more precipitation in the second stage appeared to offset the effect of the increased subsidy. We suggested changing the subsidy targeting mechanism from rewarding stocking reduction to direct grassland restoration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Grassland Science\",\"volume\":\"68 4\",\"pages\":\"383-397\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/grs.12370\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Grassland Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12370\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grassland Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/grs.12370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

2011年,中国启动了“草原生态补贴政策”,通过补贴牧民减少退化草原上的牲畜饲养,补偿牧民因减少牲畜饲养而造成的收入损失,恢复草原生态。该政策是世界上规模最大的针对畜牧业的生态系统服务资助项目,目前已分为两个5年阶段:2011年至2015年,每标准亩每年补贴1.5元,2016年至2020年,每年补贴2.5元,以促进放养减少。刺激效果如何?利用内蒙古自治区畜牧区410户牧民的面板数据,研究了2010年、2015年和2018年的放养响应,利用随机效应和普通最小二乘计量模型检验了政策实施两阶段放养率和放养减放率的各属性。本研究是第一个包含两个5年政策数据并同时考虑补贴和降水效应的实证案例。我们证实了降水对补贴政策效果的调节作用,第二阶段降水增加似乎抵消了补贴增加的影响。建议将补贴目标机制由奖励减少放畜向直接恢复草地转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of precipitation on the two-stage grassland eco-subsidy policy effect on stocking reduction in Inner Mongolia, China

China launched the Grassland Ecological Subsidy Policy in 2011 for restoring grassland ecology by paying pastoralists to downsize stocking on the degraded grasslands and compensate their income loss from livestock reduction. The policy, the largest payment for ecosystem services program targeting pastoralism in the world, has been so far through two 5-year stages: 2011 to 2015 with a subsidy at 1.5 CNY per standard mu per year and 2016 to 2020 at 2.5 CNY increased to boost the stocking reduction. How was the boost effect? We investigated that stocking responses in 2010, 2015 and 2018 using the panel data of 410 herder households in the subpolicy forage-livestock balance areas in Inner Mongolia, China, tested various attributes on stocking rate and stocking reduction rate at the two stages of the policy using econometric models of random effects and ordinary least squares. This study is the first empirical case containing the two 5-year policy data and with both subsidy and precipitation effects. We confirmed the regulating impact of precipitation on the subsidy policy effect, and more precipitation in the second stage appeared to offset the effect of the increased subsidy. We suggested changing the subsidy targeting mechanism from rewarding stocking reduction to direct grassland restoration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Grassland Science
Grassland Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Grassland Science is the official English language journal of the Japanese Society of Grassland Science. It publishes original research papers, review articles and short reports in all aspects of grassland science, with an aim of presenting and sharing knowledge, ideas and philosophies on better management and use of grasslands, forage crops and turf plants for both agricultural and non-agricultural purposes across the world. Contributions from anyone, non-members as well as members, are welcome in any of the following fields: grassland environment, landscape, ecology and systems analysis; pasture and lawn establishment, management and cultivation; grassland utilization, animal management, behavior, nutrition and production; forage conservation, processing, storage, utilization and nutritive value; physiology, morphology, pathology and entomology of plants; breeding and genetics; physicochemical property of soil, soil animals and microorganisms and plant nutrition; economics in grassland systems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cattle dung detection in pastures from drone images using YOLOv5 Potassium fertilization and defoliation intensity effects on forage characteristics of “BRS Zuri” guineagrass Phylogenomic identification and overexpression of plant size–related genes in Setaria viridis and rice Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1