{"title":"土壤磷酸酶对氮磷施肥反应的全球模式","authors":"Xiaomei GOU , Yongqing REN , Xin QIN , Xiaorong WEI , Jingjing WANG","doi":"10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hydrolysis of organic phosphorus (P) by soil phosphatases is an important process of P cycling in terrestrial ecosystems, significantly affected by nitrogen (N) and/or P fertilization. However, how soil acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities respond to N and/or P fertilization and how these responses vary with climatic regions, ecosystem types, and fertilization management remain unclear. This knowledge gap hinders our ability to assess P cycling and availability from a global perspective. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the global patterns of soil ACP and ALP activities in response to N and/or P addition. We also examined how climatic regions (arctic to tropical), ecosystem types (cropland, grassland, and forest), and fertilization management (experiment duration and fertilizer type and application rate) affected changes in soil phosphatases after fertilization. It was shown that N fertilizer resulted in 10.1% ± 2.9% increase in soil ACP activity but a minimal effect on soil ALP activity. In contrast, P fertilizer resulted in 7.7% ± 2.6% decrease in soil ACP activity but a small increase in soil ALP activity. The responses of soil ACP and ALP activities to N and/or P fertilization were largely consistent across climatic regions but varied with ecosystem types and fertilization management, and the effects of ecosystem types and fertilization management were enzyme-dependent. Random forest analysis identified climate (mean annual precipitation and temperature) and change in soil pH as the key factors explaining variations in soil ACP and ALP activities. Therefore, N input and ecosystem types should be explicitly disentangled when assessing terrestrial P cycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49709,"journal":{"name":"Pedosphere","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 200-210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000735/pdfft?md5=1888a059fd3b010b1f8075d2946ab17e&pid=1-s2.0-S1002016023000735-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global patterns of soil phosphatase responses to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomei GOU , Yongqing REN , Xin QIN , Xiaorong WEI , Jingjing WANG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pedsph.2023.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hydrolysis of organic phosphorus (P) by soil phosphatases is an important process of P cycling in terrestrial ecosystems, significantly affected by nitrogen (N) and/or P fertilization. However, how soil acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities respond to N and/or P fertilization and how these responses vary with climatic regions, ecosystem types, and fertilization management remain unclear. This knowledge gap hinders our ability to assess P cycling and availability from a global perspective. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the global patterns of soil ACP and ALP activities in response to N and/or P addition. We also examined how climatic regions (arctic to tropical), ecosystem types (cropland, grassland, and forest), and fertilization management (experiment duration and fertilizer type and application rate) affected changes in soil phosphatases after fertilization. It was shown that N fertilizer resulted in 10.1% ± 2.9% increase in soil ACP activity but a minimal effect on soil ALP activity. In contrast, P fertilizer resulted in 7.7% ± 2.6% decrease in soil ACP activity but a small increase in soil ALP activity. The responses of soil ACP and ALP activities to N and/or P fertilization were largely consistent across climatic regions but varied with ecosystem types and fertilization management, and the effects of ecosystem types and fertilization management were enzyme-dependent. Random forest analysis identified climate (mean annual precipitation and temperature) and change in soil pH as the key factors explaining variations in soil ACP and ALP activities. Therefore, N input and ecosystem types should be explicitly disentangled when assessing terrestrial P cycling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedosphere\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 200-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000735/pdfft?md5=1888a059fd3b010b1f8075d2946ab17e&pid=1-s2.0-S1002016023000735-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000735\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedosphere","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002016023000735","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
土壤磷酸酶水解有机磷(P)是陆地生态系统中磷循环的一个重要过程,受氮肥和/或磷肥的影响很大。然而,土壤酸性磷酸酶(ACP)和碱性磷酸酶(ALP)的活性如何对氮肥和/或磷肥做出反应,以及这些反应如何随气候区域、生态系统类型和施肥管理而变化,目前仍不清楚。这一知识空白阻碍了我们从全球角度评估磷循环和可用性的能力。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估全球土壤 ACP 和 ALP 活性对氮和/或磷添加的响应模式。我们还研究了气候区域(北极到热带)、生态系统类型(耕地、草地和森林)和施肥管理(实验持续时间、肥料类型和施肥量)如何影响施肥后土壤磷酸酶的变化。结果表明,氮肥导致土壤 ACP 活性增加 10.1% ± 2.9%,但对土壤 ALP 活性的影响很小。相反,施用磷肥后,土壤 ACP 活性降低了 7.7% ± 2.6%,但土壤 ALP 活性略有提高。不同气候区的土壤ACP和ALP活性对氮肥和/或磷肥的反应基本一致,但随生态系统类型和施肥管理的不同而不同,而且生态系统类型和施肥管理的影响取决于酶。随机森林分析表明,气候(年平均降水量和温度)和土壤 pH 值变化是解释土壤 ACP 和 ALP 活性变化的关键因素。因此,在评估陆地磷循环时,应明确区分氮输入和生态系统类型。
Global patterns of soil phosphatase responses to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization
Hydrolysis of organic phosphorus (P) by soil phosphatases is an important process of P cycling in terrestrial ecosystems, significantly affected by nitrogen (N) and/or P fertilization. However, how soil acid phosphatase (ACP) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activities respond to N and/or P fertilization and how these responses vary with climatic regions, ecosystem types, and fertilization management remain unclear. This knowledge gap hinders our ability to assess P cycling and availability from a global perspective. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the global patterns of soil ACP and ALP activities in response to N and/or P addition. We also examined how climatic regions (arctic to tropical), ecosystem types (cropland, grassland, and forest), and fertilization management (experiment duration and fertilizer type and application rate) affected changes in soil phosphatases after fertilization. It was shown that N fertilizer resulted in 10.1% ± 2.9% increase in soil ACP activity but a minimal effect on soil ALP activity. In contrast, P fertilizer resulted in 7.7% ± 2.6% decrease in soil ACP activity but a small increase in soil ALP activity. The responses of soil ACP and ALP activities to N and/or P fertilization were largely consistent across climatic regions but varied with ecosystem types and fertilization management, and the effects of ecosystem types and fertilization management were enzyme-dependent. Random forest analysis identified climate (mean annual precipitation and temperature) and change in soil pH as the key factors explaining variations in soil ACP and ALP activities. Therefore, N input and ecosystem types should be explicitly disentangled when assessing terrestrial P cycling.
期刊介绍:
PEDOSPHERE—a peer-reviewed international journal published bimonthly in English—welcomes submissions from scientists around the world under a broad scope of topics relevant to timely, high quality original research findings, especially up-to-date achievements and advances in the entire field of soil science studies dealing with environmental science, ecology, agriculture, bioscience, geoscience, forestry, etc. It publishes mainly original research articles as well as some reviews, mini reviews, short communications and special issues.