“它们不再属于总督,而是属于国王”:加入Huekoxzinco法典的政治

IF 0.5 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY Colonial Latin American Review Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10609164.2022.2147307
Tania Lizeth García-Piña
{"title":"“它们不再属于总督,而是属于国王”:加入Huekoxzinco法典的政治","authors":"Tania Lizeth García-Piña","doi":"10.1080/10609164.2022.2147307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1531, three Indigenous men from Huexotzingo, a town about 100 km east of Mexico City, testified in a contentious trial. The witnesses, Baltasar, Lucas Tamaueltetle, and Esteban Tochel, found themselves amid a conflict between Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés and three former members of Mexico’s Primera Audiencia (First High Court), judges Juan Ortíz de Matienzo, Diego Delgadillo, and president Nuño Beltran de Guzmán, also a conquistador. Cortés claimed that the former officials had unlawfully demanded tribute payments and services from Huexotzingo, one of his encomienda claims. A two-year legal battle ensued, yielding what is known today as the Huexotzinco Codex. It consists of eight plates (láminas) on native paper (amatl) with pictographic writing, plus a 79-folio manuscript on European paper. At first sight, the Huexotzinco Codex is the simple product of a legal dispute between rival colonizing factions, treating an Indigenous altepetl (city-state or town) as a mere pawn. However, upon closer examination, the depositions by Huexotzingo’s principales (noblemen) Baltasar and Lucas Tamaueltetle, and that of Esteban Tochel, a macehual (commoner), confirmed Cortés’s accusations. In addition to general mistreatment of the Huexotzinca, the three men accused the ex-judges of demanding material resources and manual labor from the altepetl for the construction of their private residences, along with the Dominican monastery, in Mexico City. Yet what stands out amid their declarations are lengthy and detailed accounts of the human and material resources demanded by Nuño de Guzmán for his 1529–1531 conquest expedition to northwestern Mexico, the future Kingdom of New Galicia. Among the exactions were a horse to transport a Huexotzinca leader to the war front, a military banner depicting a Madonna with Child adorned with gold and feathers, and hundreds of men readied for battle. As supporting evidence, a group of principales presented eight images on amatl depicting the requisitioned items. The images were produced between 1529 and 1531 by unknown tlacuilos (painters/writers). This article centers Indigenous experiences and voices present in the Huexotzinco Codex. It follows a key principle in the field of Native American and Indigenous Studies: that scholarship about Indigenous subjects in historical sources must bring to light narratives emphasizing Native knowledge and agency, particularly in colonial","PeriodicalId":44336,"journal":{"name":"Colonial Latin American Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"526 - 548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘They no longer belonged to the governor, but to the king’: the politics of being in the Huexotzinco Codex\",\"authors\":\"Tania Lizeth García-Piña\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10609164.2022.2147307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1531, three Indigenous men from Huexotzingo, a town about 100 km east of Mexico City, testified in a contentious trial. The witnesses, Baltasar, Lucas Tamaueltetle, and Esteban Tochel, found themselves amid a conflict between Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés and three former members of Mexico’s Primera Audiencia (First High Court), judges Juan Ortíz de Matienzo, Diego Delgadillo, and president Nuño Beltran de Guzmán, also a conquistador. Cortés claimed that the former officials had unlawfully demanded tribute payments and services from Huexotzingo, one of his encomienda claims. A two-year legal battle ensued, yielding what is known today as the Huexotzinco Codex. It consists of eight plates (láminas) on native paper (amatl) with pictographic writing, plus a 79-folio manuscript on European paper. At first sight, the Huexotzinco Codex is the simple product of a legal dispute between rival colonizing factions, treating an Indigenous altepetl (city-state or town) as a mere pawn. However, upon closer examination, the depositions by Huexotzingo’s principales (noblemen) Baltasar and Lucas Tamaueltetle, and that of Esteban Tochel, a macehual (commoner), confirmed Cortés’s accusations. In addition to general mistreatment of the Huexotzinca, the three men accused the ex-judges of demanding material resources and manual labor from the altepetl for the construction of their private residences, along with the Dominican monastery, in Mexico City. Yet what stands out amid their declarations are lengthy and detailed accounts of the human and material resources demanded by Nuño de Guzmán for his 1529–1531 conquest expedition to northwestern Mexico, the future Kingdom of New Galicia. Among the exactions were a horse to transport a Huexotzinca leader to the war front, a military banner depicting a Madonna with Child adorned with gold and feathers, and hundreds of men readied for battle. As supporting evidence, a group of principales presented eight images on amatl depicting the requisitioned items. The images were produced between 1529 and 1531 by unknown tlacuilos (painters/writers). This article centers Indigenous experiences and voices present in the Huexotzinco Codex. It follows a key principle in the field of Native American and Indigenous Studies: that scholarship about Indigenous subjects in historical sources must bring to light narratives emphasizing Native knowledge and agency, particularly in colonial\",\"PeriodicalId\":44336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"526 - 548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Colonial Latin American Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2022.2147307\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Colonial Latin American Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10609164.2022.2147307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1531年,来自墨西哥城以东约100公里的Huekoxzingo镇的三名土著男子在一场有争议的审判中作证。目击者巴尔塔萨、卢卡斯·塔梅尔泰特尔和埃斯特班·托切尔发现自己正处于西班牙征服者埃尔南·科尔特斯与墨西哥第一高等法院三名前法官胡安·奥尔蒂斯·德·马蒂恩佐、迭戈·德尔加迪洛和同样是征服者的总统努尼奥·贝尔特兰·德古兹曼之间的冲突中。Cortés声称,这些前官员非法要求Huekoxzingo支付贡品和提供服务,这是他鼓励的说法之一。随后发生了一场为期两年的法律斗争,产生了今天所知的Huekoxzinco法典。它由八块用象形文字书写的土著纸(amatl)上的图版(láminas)和一份用欧洲纸书写的79对开本手稿组成。乍一看,Huekoxzinco法典只是殖民敌对派系之间法律纠纷的简单产物,将土著altepetl(城市国家或城镇)视为棋子。然而,经过仔细审查,Huekoxzingo的主要(贵族)Baltasar和Lucas Tamaueltetle的证词,以及狼牙哥(平民)Esteban Tochel的证词,证实了Cortés的指控。除了普遍虐待Huekoxdzinca外,这三名男子还指控前法官向altepetl索要物质资源和体力劳动,用于在墨西哥城建造他们的私人住宅以及多明尼加修道院。然而,在他们的宣言中,最突出的是对努尼奥·德·古兹曼1529-1531年征服墨西哥西北部(未来的新加利西亚王国)所需人力和物力的详细描述。在这些勒索中,有一匹马将一位Huekoxdzinca领导人运送到前线,一条用金色和羽毛装饰的印有圣母玛利亚和孩子的军旗,以及数百名准备战斗的男子。作为支持证据,一组主要负责人在amatl上展示了八幅描绘被征用物品的图像。这些图像是在1529年至1531年间由不知名的特拉库伊洛斯(画家/作家)创作的。这篇文章集中介绍了Huekoxzinco法典中的土著经验和声音。它遵循了美洲原住民和原住民研究领域的一个关键原则:历史资料中关于原住民主题的学术研究必须揭示强调原住民知识和能动性的叙事,特别是在殖民地
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘They no longer belonged to the governor, but to the king’: the politics of being in the Huexotzinco Codex
In 1531, three Indigenous men from Huexotzingo, a town about 100 km east of Mexico City, testified in a contentious trial. The witnesses, Baltasar, Lucas Tamaueltetle, and Esteban Tochel, found themselves amid a conflict between Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés and three former members of Mexico’s Primera Audiencia (First High Court), judges Juan Ortíz de Matienzo, Diego Delgadillo, and president Nuño Beltran de Guzmán, also a conquistador. Cortés claimed that the former officials had unlawfully demanded tribute payments and services from Huexotzingo, one of his encomienda claims. A two-year legal battle ensued, yielding what is known today as the Huexotzinco Codex. It consists of eight plates (láminas) on native paper (amatl) with pictographic writing, plus a 79-folio manuscript on European paper. At first sight, the Huexotzinco Codex is the simple product of a legal dispute between rival colonizing factions, treating an Indigenous altepetl (city-state or town) as a mere pawn. However, upon closer examination, the depositions by Huexotzingo’s principales (noblemen) Baltasar and Lucas Tamaueltetle, and that of Esteban Tochel, a macehual (commoner), confirmed Cortés’s accusations. In addition to general mistreatment of the Huexotzinca, the three men accused the ex-judges of demanding material resources and manual labor from the altepetl for the construction of their private residences, along with the Dominican monastery, in Mexico City. Yet what stands out amid their declarations are lengthy and detailed accounts of the human and material resources demanded by Nuño de Guzmán for his 1529–1531 conquest expedition to northwestern Mexico, the future Kingdom of New Galicia. Among the exactions were a horse to transport a Huexotzinca leader to the war front, a military banner depicting a Madonna with Child adorned with gold and feathers, and hundreds of men readied for battle. As supporting evidence, a group of principales presented eight images on amatl depicting the requisitioned items. The images were produced between 1529 and 1531 by unknown tlacuilos (painters/writers). This article centers Indigenous experiences and voices present in the Huexotzinco Codex. It follows a key principle in the field of Native American and Indigenous Studies: that scholarship about Indigenous subjects in historical sources must bring to light narratives emphasizing Native knowledge and agency, particularly in colonial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Colonial Latin American Review (CLAR) is a unique interdisciplinary journal devoted to the study of the colonial period in Latin America. The journal was created in 1992, in response to the growing scholarly interest in colonial themes related to the Quincentenary. CLAR offers a critical forum where scholars can exchange ideas, revise traditional areas of inquiry and chart new directions of research. With the conviction that this dialogue will enrich the emerging field of Latin American colonial studies, CLAR offers a variety of scholarly approaches and formats, including articles, debates, review-essays and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Devouring the empire: the Pijaos’ anticolonial project in the sixteenth-century northern Andes The conquest of Mexico: 500 years of reinventions Las reelaboraciones del denominado Manual del christiano de fray Bernardino de Sahagún en dos nuevos manuscritos: BCT 35-22, Montejano 2 The fame of Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz: posthumous fashioning in the early modern Hispanic word Adrift on an inland sea: misinformation and the limits of empire in the Brazilian backlands
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1