视觉短期记忆中模态特异性分心的来源和机制

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL VISUAL COGNITION Pub Date : 2022-10-21 DOI:10.1080/13506285.2022.2162174
Tom Mercer, R. Shaw, Luke P Fisher
{"title":"视觉短期记忆中模态特异性分心的来源和机制","authors":"Tom Mercer, R. Shaw, Luke P Fisher","doi":"10.1080/13506285.2022.2162174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Visual short-term and working memory can be disrupted by irrelevant, distracting input occurring after encoding. Distractors similar to the original memory are known to be interfering, but it is unclear whether dissimilar distractors have the same disruptive effect. The presence of dissimilar distraction would be problematic for views of similarity-based interference, hence the present study investigated modality-specific distraction using a procedure that required participants to compare single target and probe objects over a delay. An irrelevant distractor could be presented during the delay separating the target and probe, but it varied in its similarity to the target. In four experiments, recognition was disrupted by the presence of a distractor, even when the distractors were highly dissimilar to the target. Furthermore, the interference effect was not reduced when the same distractors were repeatedly used throughout the experiment, and interference from dissimilar distractors was only lessened when it was extremely predictable. These findings indicate that susceptibility to dissimilar distraction is a persistent limitation in visual short-term memory.","PeriodicalId":47961,"journal":{"name":"VISUAL COGNITION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sources and mechanisms of modality-specific distraction in visual short-term memory\",\"authors\":\"Tom Mercer, R. Shaw, Luke P Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13506285.2022.2162174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Visual short-term and working memory can be disrupted by irrelevant, distracting input occurring after encoding. Distractors similar to the original memory are known to be interfering, but it is unclear whether dissimilar distractors have the same disruptive effect. The presence of dissimilar distraction would be problematic for views of similarity-based interference, hence the present study investigated modality-specific distraction using a procedure that required participants to compare single target and probe objects over a delay. An irrelevant distractor could be presented during the delay separating the target and probe, but it varied in its similarity to the target. In four experiments, recognition was disrupted by the presence of a distractor, even when the distractors were highly dissimilar to the target. Furthermore, the interference effect was not reduced when the same distractors were repeatedly used throughout the experiment, and interference from dissimilar distractors was only lessened when it was extremely predictable. These findings indicate that susceptibility to dissimilar distraction is a persistent limitation in visual short-term memory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VISUAL COGNITION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2162174\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VISUAL COGNITION","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2022.2162174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要编码后出现的不相关的、分散注意力的输入可能会扰乱视觉短期记忆和工作记忆。已知与原始记忆相似的干扰因素会产生干扰,但尚不清楚不同的干扰因素是否具有相同的干扰效果。不同分心的存在对于基于相似性的干扰的观点来说是有问题的,因此本研究使用了一种程序来研究特定模态的分心,该程序要求参与者在一段时间内比较单个目标和探测对象。在目标和探针分离的延迟过程中,可能会出现不相关的干扰物,但它与目标的相似性不同。在四个实验中,即使干扰物与目标高度不同,识别也会因干扰物的存在而中断。此外,当在整个实验中重复使用相同的干扰物时,干扰效应并没有减少,而来自不同干扰物的干扰只有在非常可预测的情况下才会减少。这些发现表明,对不同分心的易感性是视觉短期记忆的一个持续限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sources and mechanisms of modality-specific distraction in visual short-term memory
ABSTRACT Visual short-term and working memory can be disrupted by irrelevant, distracting input occurring after encoding. Distractors similar to the original memory are known to be interfering, but it is unclear whether dissimilar distractors have the same disruptive effect. The presence of dissimilar distraction would be problematic for views of similarity-based interference, hence the present study investigated modality-specific distraction using a procedure that required participants to compare single target and probe objects over a delay. An irrelevant distractor could be presented during the delay separating the target and probe, but it varied in its similarity to the target. In four experiments, recognition was disrupted by the presence of a distractor, even when the distractors were highly dissimilar to the target. Furthermore, the interference effect was not reduced when the same distractors were repeatedly used throughout the experiment, and interference from dissimilar distractors was only lessened when it was extremely predictable. These findings indicate that susceptibility to dissimilar distraction is a persistent limitation in visual short-term memory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VISUAL COGNITION
VISUAL COGNITION PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Visual Cognition publishes new empirical research that increases theoretical understanding of human visual cognition. Studies may be concerned with any aspect of visual cognition such as object, face, and scene recognition; visual attention and search; short-term and long-term visual memory; visual word recognition and reading; eye movement control and active vision; and visual imagery. The journal is devoted to research at the interface of visual perception and cognition and does not typically publish papers in areas of perception or psychophysics that are covered by the many publication outlets for those topics.
期刊最新文献
Auditory distractors are processed but do not interfere with visual search of any difficulty when sound is irrelevant Handling distractor interference in mixed and fixed search Distraction from long-term memory in visual search: Acquired procedural and template-based memory interfere with contextual cueing after target re-location Within-Subject manipulations of proactive control do not change negative templates benefits: Exploring the effect of reward on negative and positive cues No difference in prior representations of what to attend and what to ignore
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1