老年人社会参与评估工具的系统评价

Hamin Lee, Mi Kyeong Kim, H. Park
{"title":"老年人社会参与评估工具的系统评价","authors":"Hamin Lee, Mi Kyeong Kim, H. Park","doi":"10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.2.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This systematic review analyzed the literature using social participation assessment tools for older adults and presented the frequency of use, assessment items, and methods of each assessment. Using databases from Pubmed, CINAHL, and Web of Science, a total of 1,386 studies were collected. 18 studies were selected according to the selection and exclusion criteria. 9 studies (50%) were published in the last five years. In the case of research design, 12 studies (66.6%) were designed as cross-sectional survey studies, which were found to be the most common. There were a total of 11 assessment tools for older adults’ social participation among 18 studies. The most widely used assessment tool was Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H), which was used in a total of 7 studies (38.9%). It was found that the components were different for each tool. Most of the assessment tools were in the form of self-reporting questionnaires. Frequency of the participation was the most c ommon method. Others asked the degree of diffic ulty and a number or status of partic ipating ac tivities. This study can help clinicians or researchers select social participation assessment tools, and it is expected that appropriate tool selection can lead to better understanding older adults’ social participation.","PeriodicalId":90513,"journal":{"name":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review on the Social Participation Assessment Tool for Older Adults\",\"authors\":\"Hamin Lee, Mi Kyeong Kim, H. Park\",\"doi\":\"10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.2.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This systematic review analyzed the literature using social participation assessment tools for older adults and presented the frequency of use, assessment items, and methods of each assessment. Using databases from Pubmed, CINAHL, and Web of Science, a total of 1,386 studies were collected. 18 studies were selected according to the selection and exclusion criteria. 9 studies (50%) were published in the last five years. In the case of research design, 12 studies (66.6%) were designed as cross-sectional survey studies, which were found to be the most common. There were a total of 11 assessment tools for older adults’ social participation among 18 studies. The most widely used assessment tool was Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H), which was used in a total of 7 studies (38.9%). It was found that the components were different for each tool. Most of the assessment tools were in the form of self-reporting questionnaires. Frequency of the participation was the most c ommon method. Others asked the degree of diffic ulty and a number or status of partic ipating ac tivities. This study can help clinicians or researchers select social participation assessment tools, and it is expected that appropriate tool selection can lead to better understanding older adults’ social participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.2.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Han'guk nonyonhak = Journal of Korea Gerontological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31888/jkgs.2023.43.2.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇系统综述分析了使用老年人社会参与评估工具的文献,并介绍了每次评估的使用频率、评估项目和方法。使用Pubmed、CINAHL和Web of Science的数据库,共收集了1386项研究。根据选择和排除标准选择了18项研究。在过去五年中发表了9项研究(50%)。在研究设计的情况下,12项研究(66.6%)被设计为横断面调查研究,这是最常见的。在18项研究中,共有11种老年人社会参与评估工具。使用最广泛的评估工具是生活习惯评估(Life-H),共有7项研究(38.9%)使用了该工具。发现每个工具的组成部分都不同。大多数评估工具采用自我报告调查表的形式。参与频率是最常见的方法。其他人则询问参与活动的困难程度和数量或状态。这项研究可以帮助临床医生或研究人员选择社会参与评估工具,预计适当的工具选择可以更好地了解老年人的社会参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Systematic Review on the Social Participation Assessment Tool for Older Adults
This systematic review analyzed the literature using social participation assessment tools for older adults and presented the frequency of use, assessment items, and methods of each assessment. Using databases from Pubmed, CINAHL, and Web of Science, a total of 1,386 studies were collected. 18 studies were selected according to the selection and exclusion criteria. 9 studies (50%) were published in the last five years. In the case of research design, 12 studies (66.6%) were designed as cross-sectional survey studies, which were found to be the most common. There were a total of 11 assessment tools for older adults’ social participation among 18 studies. The most widely used assessment tool was Assessment of Life Habits (LIFE-H), which was used in a total of 7 studies (38.9%). It was found that the components were different for each tool. Most of the assessment tools were in the form of self-reporting questionnaires. Frequency of the participation was the most c ommon method. Others asked the degree of diffic ulty and a number or status of partic ipating ac tivities. This study can help clinicians or researchers select social participation assessment tools, and it is expected that appropriate tool selection can lead to better understanding older adults’ social participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Support Expectation and Policy Trust on Anxiety about Aging among the Middle-Aged: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Preparation for Old Age The Effect of the Characteristics of Users of Personalized Care Services for the Elderly on Life Satisfaction Caring for Older Adults: The Effects of Gratitude and Support in Family Caregivers' Care Burden-Distress Relationship The Effect of the Residential Environment of the Elderly on Aging in Place: Focusing on Comparison of Regions The Relationship between Nutritional Status and Depression in the Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment Group: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Social Support
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1