我与布迪厄的合作：工具、利益和承诺

Q4 Social Sciences Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.3280/sr2021-126009

Alicia B. Gutiérrez

{"title":"我与布迪厄的合作：工具、利益和承诺","authors":"Alicia B. Gutiérrez","doi":"10.3280/sr2021-126009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author synthesizes the main pillars of her research agenda: marginality, deviance, and social classes. Her relationship with Bourdieu is carefully explored, together with her leading role of Bourdieusian scholar in the South American academic field. The interlocking of theory and practice is advocated, stressing the significance of political engagement. The broad, trans-contextual applicability of Bourdieu's methodology is also emphasized, and so is the necessity to address the specificity of local research contexts.","PeriodicalId":52504,"journal":{"name":"Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"My Work with and from Bourdieu: Tools, Stakes and Commitment\",\"authors\":\"Alicia B. Gutiérrez\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/sr2021-126009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author synthesizes the main pillars of her research agenda: marginality, deviance, and social classes. Her relationship with Bourdieu is carefully explored, together with her leading role of Bourdieusian scholar in the South American academic field. The interlocking of theory and practice is advocated, stressing the significance of political engagement. The broad, trans-contextual applicability of Bourdieu's methodology is also emphasized, and so is the necessity to address the specificity of local research contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/sr2021-126009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/sr2021-126009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

作者综合了她的研究议程的主要支柱：边缘性、偏差和社会阶层。她与布迪厄的关系，以及她作为布迪厄学者在南美学术领域的主导作用，都得到了仔细的探讨。主张理论与实践相结合，强调政治参与的重要意义。还强调了布迪厄方法论的广泛、跨语境的适用性，以及解决当地研究背景的特殊性的必要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

My Work with and from Bourdieu: Tools, Stakes and Commitment

The author synthesizes the main pillars of her research agenda: marginality, deviance, and social classes. Her relationship with Bourdieu is carefully explored, together with her leading role of Bourdieusian scholar in the South American academic field. The interlocking of theory and practice is advocated, stressing the significance of political engagement. The broad, trans-contextual applicability of Bourdieu's methodology is also emphasized, and so is the necessity to address the specificity of local research contexts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale (Sociology and Sociological Research), was founded in 1980 by a group of professors from different Italian universities and different branches of Sociology. The aim was to achieve two main goals. The first was to create a channel for communication among specialists not subject to academic limitation of any sort. The second was to pursue the project of a logically and methodologically based empirical research, focusing on one hand on the relations between scientific statute of social theory, and on the other on social intervention. The fundamental need for pluralism has guided the work of this review since it was founded. Italian and foreign authors from academic, research or professional backgrounds discuss themes and issues that range from social theory, sociology of communication, professions in the field, complex organizations, and social services, to labor rights and policies and sociology of the sciences and knowledge.