消费者对绿色销售房屋的预订、买卖承诺和买卖中的不公平条款无效

Macarena Díaz de Valdés Haase
{"title":"消费者对绿色销售房屋的预订、买卖承诺和买卖中的不公平条款无效","authors":"Macarena Díaz de Valdés Haase","doi":"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work analyzes the sentence handed down in Sernac against Socovesa S.A., and another (2020) that pronounces on a claim derived for the defense of the collective interest of consumers by virtue of the special procedure established in article 53 of Title IV of the LPDC. The action is based on the different abusive clauses that the defendants maintain in the adhesion contracts that they usually enter into with consumers during the process of buying a house using the so-called green modality; These are the reserve for the home purchase operation, the contract of the promise of sale and the contract of sale with a mutual mortgage. The study focuses specifically on the claims related to the declaration of nullity of certain clauses that were rejected in the judgment of the first instance that was confirmed by the Court of Appeals of Santiago. Consequently, it reflects on the nature of reservations as an adhesion contract, on the interpretation of article 138 bis of the LGUC in the light of consumer rights and also, on the object of the clauses of accordance.","PeriodicalId":36265,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nulidad de cláusulas abusivas en reservas, promesas de compraventa y compraventas suscritas por consumidores de viviendas comercializadas en verde\",\"authors\":\"Macarena Díaz de Valdés Haase\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/S0718-80722020000200273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work analyzes the sentence handed down in Sernac against Socovesa S.A., and another (2020) that pronounces on a claim derived for the defense of the collective interest of consumers by virtue of the special procedure established in article 53 of Title IV of the LPDC. The action is based on the different abusive clauses that the defendants maintain in the adhesion contracts that they usually enter into with consumers during the process of buying a house using the so-called green modality; These are the reserve for the home purchase operation, the contract of the promise of sale and the contract of sale with a mutual mortgage. The study focuses specifically on the claims related to the declaration of nullity of certain clauses that were rejected in the judgment of the first instance that was confirmed by the Court of Appeals of Santiago. Consequently, it reflects on the nature of reservations as an adhesion contract, on the interpretation of article 138 bis of the LGUC in the light of consumer rights and also, on the object of the clauses of accordance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-80722020000200273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作分析了Sernac对Socovesa美国的判决,以及另一项(2020年)根据《法律责任法》第四篇第53条规定的特别程序为维护消费者集体利益而提出的索赔。该诉讼基于被告在使用所谓的绿色模式买房过程中通常与消费者签订的附加合同中所保留的不同滥用条款;这些是购房业务准备金、销售承诺合同和相互抵押的销售合同。这项研究特别侧重于与宣布某些条款无效有关的索赔,这些条款在圣地亚哥上诉法院确认的一审判决中被驳回。因此,它反映了保留作为附随合同的性质,反映了根据消费者权利对《LGUC》第138条之二的解释,也反映了一致条款的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nulidad de cláusulas abusivas en reservas, promesas de compraventa y compraventas suscritas por consumidores de viviendas comercializadas en verde
This work analyzes the sentence handed down in Sernac against Socovesa S.A., and another (2020) that pronounces on a claim derived for the defense of the collective interest of consumers by virtue of the special procedure established in article 53 of Title IV of the LPDC. The action is based on the different abusive clauses that the defendants maintain in the adhesion contracts that they usually enter into with consumers during the process of buying a house using the so-called green modality; These are the reserve for the home purchase operation, the contract of the promise of sale and the contract of sale with a mutual mortgage. The study focuses specifically on the claims related to the declaration of nullity of certain clauses that were rejected in the judgment of the first instance that was confirmed by the Court of Appeals of Santiago. Consequently, it reflects on the nature of reservations as an adhesion contract, on the interpretation of article 138 bis of the LGUC in the light of consumer rights and also, on the object of the clauses of accordance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
EL INTERÉS COMPROMETIDO EN LA DECLARACIÓN DE CLÁUSULAS ABUSIVAS COMO JUSTIFICANTE DE LA ACCIÓN POR EL INTERÉS GENERAL NO RENOVACIONES DE MATRÍCULAS DE NIÑOS, NIÑAS Y ADOLESCENTES CON TRASTORNO DE DÉFICIT ATENCIONAL E HIPERACTIVIDAD: UNO DE LOS PROBLEMAS QUE DEBE RESOLVER una educación verdaderamente inclusiva APLICACIÓN DE LAS NORMAS CONTENIDAS EN LA LEY N.º 19496 A COMUNICACIONES DE NATURALEZA PUBLICITARIA EMITIDAS POR LÍDERES DE OPINIÓN O INFLUENCERS EL LITIGANTE APARENTE EN EL CÓDIGO DE ÉTICA PROFESIONAL DEL COLEGIO DE ABOGADOS DE CHILE A.G. LA CLÁUSULA “SE FACULTA AL PORTADOR” COMO MANDATO INNOMINADO QUE TERMINA CON LA MUERTE DEL COMPRADOR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1