CHAMP、GRACE和GRACE-FO新的热层中性质量密度和侧风数据集

IF 3.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate Pub Date : 2023-05-11 DOI:10.1051/swsc/2023014
C. Siemes, C. Borries, S. Bruinsma, I. Fernández-Gómez, N. Hładczuk, J. van den Ijssel, Timothy Kodikara, K. Vielberg, P. Visser
{"title":"CHAMP、GRACE和GRACE-FO新的热层中性质量密度和侧风数据集","authors":"C. Siemes, C. Borries, S. Bruinsma, I. Fernández-Gómez, N. Hładczuk, J. van den Ijssel, Timothy Kodikara, K. Vielberg, P. Visser","doi":"10.1051/swsc/2023014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present new neutral mass density and crosswind observations for the CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO missions, filling the last gaps in our database of accelerometer-derived thermosphere observations. For consistency, we processed the data over the entire lifetime of these missions, noting that the results for GRACE in 2011-2017 and GRACE-FO are entirely new. All accelerometer data are newly calibrated. We modeled the temperature-induced bias variations for the GRACE accelerometer data to counter the detrimental effects of the accelerometer thermal control deactivation in April 2011. Further, we developed a new radiation pressure model, which uses ray tracing to account for shadowing and multiple reflections and calculates the satellite's thermal emissions based on the illumination history. The advances in calibration and radiation pressure modeling are essential when the radiation pressure acceleration is significant compared to the aerodynamic one above 450 km altitude during low solar activity, where the GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites spent a considerable fraction of their mission lifetime. The mean of the new density observations changes only marginally, but their standard deviation shows a substantial reduction compared to thermosphere models, up to 15% for GRACE in 2009. The mean and standard deviation of the new GRACE-FO density observations are in good agreement with the GRACE observations. The GRACE and CHAMP crosswind observations agree well with the physics-based TIE-GCM winds, particularly the polar wind patterns. The mean observed crosswind is a few tens of m/s larger than the model one, which we attribute primarily to the crosswind errors being positive by the definition of the retrieval algorithm. The correlation between observed and model crosswind is about 60%, except for GRACE in 2004-2011 when the signal was too small to retrieve crosswinds reliably.","PeriodicalId":17034,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Thermosphere Neutral Mass Density and Crosswind Datasets from CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO\",\"authors\":\"C. Siemes, C. Borries, S. Bruinsma, I. Fernández-Gómez, N. Hładczuk, J. van den Ijssel, Timothy Kodikara, K. Vielberg, P. Visser\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/swsc/2023014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present new neutral mass density and crosswind observations for the CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO missions, filling the last gaps in our database of accelerometer-derived thermosphere observations. For consistency, we processed the data over the entire lifetime of these missions, noting that the results for GRACE in 2011-2017 and GRACE-FO are entirely new. All accelerometer data are newly calibrated. We modeled the temperature-induced bias variations for the GRACE accelerometer data to counter the detrimental effects of the accelerometer thermal control deactivation in April 2011. Further, we developed a new radiation pressure model, which uses ray tracing to account for shadowing and multiple reflections and calculates the satellite's thermal emissions based on the illumination history. The advances in calibration and radiation pressure modeling are essential when the radiation pressure acceleration is significant compared to the aerodynamic one above 450 km altitude during low solar activity, where the GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites spent a considerable fraction of their mission lifetime. The mean of the new density observations changes only marginally, but their standard deviation shows a substantial reduction compared to thermosphere models, up to 15% for GRACE in 2009. The mean and standard deviation of the new GRACE-FO density observations are in good agreement with the GRACE observations. The GRACE and CHAMP crosswind observations agree well with the physics-based TIE-GCM winds, particularly the polar wind patterns. The mean observed crosswind is a few tens of m/s larger than the model one, which we attribute primarily to the crosswind errors being positive by the definition of the retrieval algorithm. The correlation between observed and model crosswind is about 60%, except for GRACE in 2004-2011 when the signal was too small to retrieve crosswinds reliably.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2023014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2023014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们为CHAMP、GRACE和GRACE-FO任务提供了新的中性质量密度和侧风观测,填补了我们的加速度计衍生热层观测数据库中的最后空白。为了保持一致性,我们处理了这些任务整个生命周期的数据,注意到2011-2017年GRACE和GRACE-FO的结果是全新的。所有加速度计数据都是新校准的。我们对GRACE加速度计数据的温度引起的偏差变化进行了建模,以应对2011年4月加速度计热控制停用的不利影响。此外,我们开发了一个新的辐射压力模型,该模型使用光线追踪来计算阴影和多次反射,并根据照明历史计算卫星的热发射。当辐射压力加速度与低太阳活动期间450公里以上的空气动力学加速度相比具有显著意义时,校准和辐射压力建模方面的进展至关重要,在低太阳活动中,GRACE和GRACE-FO卫星在其任务寿命中花费了相当大的一部分时间。新密度观测值的平均值变化很小,但与热层模型相比,它们的标准差大幅降低,2009年GRACE的标准差高达15%。新的GRACE-FO密度观测值的平均值和标准差与GRACE观测值吻合良好。GRACE和CHAMP侧风观测结果与基于物理的TIE-GCM风,特别是极地风模式非常一致。观测到的平均侧风比模型大几十m/s,我们主要将其归因于检索算法定义的正侧风误差。观测到的侧风和模型侧风之间的相关性约为60%,除了2004-2011年的GRACE,当时信号太小,无法可靠地检索侧风。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Thermosphere Neutral Mass Density and Crosswind Datasets from CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO
We present new neutral mass density and crosswind observations for the CHAMP, GRACE, and GRACE-FO missions, filling the last gaps in our database of accelerometer-derived thermosphere observations. For consistency, we processed the data over the entire lifetime of these missions, noting that the results for GRACE in 2011-2017 and GRACE-FO are entirely new. All accelerometer data are newly calibrated. We modeled the temperature-induced bias variations for the GRACE accelerometer data to counter the detrimental effects of the accelerometer thermal control deactivation in April 2011. Further, we developed a new radiation pressure model, which uses ray tracing to account for shadowing and multiple reflections and calculates the satellite's thermal emissions based on the illumination history. The advances in calibration and radiation pressure modeling are essential when the radiation pressure acceleration is significant compared to the aerodynamic one above 450 km altitude during low solar activity, where the GRACE and GRACE-FO satellites spent a considerable fraction of their mission lifetime. The mean of the new density observations changes only marginally, but their standard deviation shows a substantial reduction compared to thermosphere models, up to 15% for GRACE in 2009. The mean and standard deviation of the new GRACE-FO density observations are in good agreement with the GRACE observations. The GRACE and CHAMP crosswind observations agree well with the physics-based TIE-GCM winds, particularly the polar wind patterns. The mean observed crosswind is a few tens of m/s larger than the model one, which we attribute primarily to the crosswind errors being positive by the definition of the retrieval algorithm. The correlation between observed and model crosswind is about 60%, except for GRACE in 2004-2011 when the signal was too small to retrieve crosswinds reliably.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate
Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate (SWSC) is an international multi-disciplinary and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed open access journal which publishes papers on all aspects of space weather and space climate from a broad range of scientific and technical fields including solar physics, space plasma physics, aeronomy, planetology, radio science, geophysics, biology, medicine, astronautics, aeronautics, electrical engineering, meteorology, climatology, mathematics, economy, informatics.
期刊最新文献
Multi-Instrument Observations and Tracking of a Coronal Mass Ejection Front From Low to Middle Corona A Bayesian approach to the drag-based modelling of ICMEs Reconstruction of electron precipitation spectra at the top of the upper atmosphere using 427.8 nm auroral images Karl von Lindener's Sunspot Observations during 1800 – 1827: Another Long-Term Dataset for the Dalton Minimum On the detection of a solar radio burst event occurred on 28 August 2022 and its effect on GNSS signals as observed by ionospheric scintillation monitors distributed over the American sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1