摘要编号-50:多平面重建改变颈动脉网病例CTA成像的诊断性能

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.050
Hend Abdelhamid, N. Bhatt, L. S. Viana, Felipe M Ferreira, R. Nogueira, A. Al-Bayati, J. Grossberg, Jason W. Allen, D. Haussen
{"title":"摘要编号-50:多平面重建改变颈动脉网病例CTA成像的诊断性能","authors":"Hend Abdelhamid, N. Bhatt, L. S. Viana, Felipe M Ferreira, R. Nogueira, A. Al-Bayati, J. Grossberg, Jason W. Allen, D. Haussen","doi":"10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Carotid Web (CaW) represents an important and overlooked etiology for ischemic stroke and has been associated with high rates of stroke recurrence. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been shown to have comparable performance to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and has been suggested to be the non‐invasive imaging of choice for CaW detection. However, misdiagnosis has been demonstrated to be common even in specialized centers. We evaluated the impact of adding CTA multiplane reconstruction (MPR) andthree‐dimensional maximum intensity projection (3D MIP) reformat on the diagnostic performance of CTA in CaW detection.\n \n \n \n After exclusion of patients aged >65 years old and patients with no available/poor quality CTA,CaW cases (n = 31 consecutive patients leading to 31 ipsilateral carotids to the stroke derived from out prospective CaW database), as well as two other groups: 1)carotid atherosclerosis (n = 27consecutivepatients from out carotid stenting database leading to 27 carotids contralateral to the index lesion) and 2) consecutive normal carotid cases (n = 49 patients with normal carotids extracted from the electronic medical records for patients imaged due to suspected blunt cerebrovascular trauma) were included. All CTA images were deidentified and reviewed independently by three stroke neurologists to record the diagnosis and level of diagnostic certainty (in form of a scale (1[lowest]‐to‐5[highest]) after evaluating the CTA axial plane alone, then after sagittal and coronal planes (MPR) reconstructions, and then after evaluation of3D MIP reformatted images.The analyses were made for the total number of observations for all readers (93 CaWs, 81 atherosclerosis cases and 147 normal carotids).\n \n \n \n On reviewing CTA axial projection alone, raters correctly diagnosed 44.1% of CaW, 87.7% of carotid atherosclerosis and 83% of normal carotid images. Sagittal and coronal MPR significantly increased the rate of accurate CaW diagnosis (76.3%‐Table 1) The certainty level for CaW diagnosis was lower when compared to atherosclerosis as well as normal carotid using the CTA axial projection alone (3.0[3.0‐4.0] vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001 and vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001) as well as after adding sagittal/coronal MPR (4.0[3.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.0‐5.0],p = 0.01; and vs 4.0[4.0‐5.0],p< 0.001). The certainty level became similar between CaW and atherosclerosis as well as normal carotids with the addition of 3D MIP (5.0[5.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.5‐5.0], p = 0.61; and vs 5.0[5.0‐5.0],p = 0.15) respectively. Inter‐rater agreement in CaW detection increased from k = 0.46(0.35‐0.57);p< 0.05usingaxial section to k = 0.80(0.69‐0.91);p< 0.05 with MPR. Axial projection alone had lower sensitivity in CaW detection (AUC = 0.69(0.62‐0.76),sensitivity = 44%,specificity = 95%,p< 0.05) compared to MPR (AUC = 0.86(0.80‐0.91),sensitivity = 76%,specificity = 96%,p< 0.05). Misdiagnosed CaW cases, after using all planes with 3D MIP (n = 23/93), were older (56[46‐61] vs 52[46‐57] years,p = 0.04) and lower length/base ratio (0.51[0.49‐0.87] vs 0.92[0.74‐1.19],p< 0.001) compared to the correctly diagnosed CaW cases (n = 70/93).\n \n \n \n CTA axial plane alone is unreliable to detect CaW and the addition of sagittal/coronal MPR and 3D MIPs are important to increase accurate diagnosis and perceived reader diagnostic certainty.\n","PeriodicalId":74875,"journal":{"name":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abstract Number ‐ 50: Multiplane Reconstruction Modifies The Diagnostic Performance Of CTA Imaging In Carotid Web Cases\",\"authors\":\"Hend Abdelhamid, N. Bhatt, L. S. Viana, Felipe M Ferreira, R. Nogueira, A. Al-Bayati, J. Grossberg, Jason W. Allen, D. Haussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Carotid Web (CaW) represents an important and overlooked etiology for ischemic stroke and has been associated with high rates of stroke recurrence. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been shown to have comparable performance to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and has been suggested to be the non‐invasive imaging of choice for CaW detection. However, misdiagnosis has been demonstrated to be common even in specialized centers. We evaluated the impact of adding CTA multiplane reconstruction (MPR) andthree‐dimensional maximum intensity projection (3D MIP) reformat on the diagnostic performance of CTA in CaW detection.\\n \\n \\n \\n After exclusion of patients aged >65 years old and patients with no available/poor quality CTA,CaW cases (n = 31 consecutive patients leading to 31 ipsilateral carotids to the stroke derived from out prospective CaW database), as well as two other groups: 1)carotid atherosclerosis (n = 27consecutivepatients from out carotid stenting database leading to 27 carotids contralateral to the index lesion) and 2) consecutive normal carotid cases (n = 49 patients with normal carotids extracted from the electronic medical records for patients imaged due to suspected blunt cerebrovascular trauma) were included. All CTA images were deidentified and reviewed independently by three stroke neurologists to record the diagnosis and level of diagnostic certainty (in form of a scale (1[lowest]‐to‐5[highest]) after evaluating the CTA axial plane alone, then after sagittal and coronal planes (MPR) reconstructions, and then after evaluation of3D MIP reformatted images.The analyses were made for the total number of observations for all readers (93 CaWs, 81 atherosclerosis cases and 147 normal carotids).\\n \\n \\n \\n On reviewing CTA axial projection alone, raters correctly diagnosed 44.1% of CaW, 87.7% of carotid atherosclerosis and 83% of normal carotid images. Sagittal and coronal MPR significantly increased the rate of accurate CaW diagnosis (76.3%‐Table 1) The certainty level for CaW diagnosis was lower when compared to atherosclerosis as well as normal carotid using the CTA axial projection alone (3.0[3.0‐4.0] vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001 and vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001) as well as after adding sagittal/coronal MPR (4.0[3.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.0‐5.0],p = 0.01; and vs 4.0[4.0‐5.0],p< 0.001). The certainty level became similar between CaW and atherosclerosis as well as normal carotids with the addition of 3D MIP (5.0[5.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.5‐5.0], p = 0.61; and vs 5.0[5.0‐5.0],p = 0.15) respectively. Inter‐rater agreement in CaW detection increased from k = 0.46(0.35‐0.57);p< 0.05usingaxial section to k = 0.80(0.69‐0.91);p< 0.05 with MPR. Axial projection alone had lower sensitivity in CaW detection (AUC = 0.69(0.62‐0.76),sensitivity = 44%,specificity = 95%,p< 0.05) compared to MPR (AUC = 0.86(0.80‐0.91),sensitivity = 76%,specificity = 96%,p< 0.05). Misdiagnosed CaW cases, after using all planes with 3D MIP (n = 23/93), were older (56[46‐61] vs 52[46‐57] years,p = 0.04) and lower length/base ratio (0.51[0.49‐0.87] vs 0.92[0.74‐1.19],p< 0.001) compared to the correctly diagnosed CaW cases (n = 70/93).\\n \\n \\n \\n CTA axial plane alone is unreliable to detect CaW and the addition of sagittal/coronal MPR and 3D MIPs are important to increase accurate diagnosis and perceived reader diagnostic certainty.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":74875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/svin.03.suppl_1.050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈动脉网(CaW)是缺血性中风的一个重要且被忽视的病因,与中风复发率高有关。计算机断层摄影血管造影术(CTA)已被证明具有与数字减影血管造影学(DSA)相当的性能,并被认为是CaW检测的非侵入性成像选择。然而,即使在专业中心,误诊也很常见。我们评估了添加CTA多平面重建(MPR)和三维最大强度投影(3D MIP)格式对CTA在CaW检测中诊断性能的影响。在排除年龄>65岁的患者和没有可用/质量差的CTA的患者后,以及另外两组:1)颈动脉粥样硬化(n=27名来自颈动脉支架数据库的连续患者,导致指标病变对侧的27个颈动脉)和2)连续的正常颈动脉病例(n=49名从疑似钝性脑血管损伤成像的患者的电子医疗记录中提取正常颈动脉的患者)。三名中风神经学家对所有CTA图像进行识别和独立审查,以记录单独评估CTA轴平面后、矢状面和冠状面(MPR)重建后以及评估3D MIP重新格式化图像后的诊断和诊断确定性水平(以1[最低]-5[最高]的形式)。对所有读者的观察总数进行分析(93例CaW、81例动脉粥样硬化病例和147例正常颈动脉)。仅在回顾CTA轴向投影时,评分者正确诊断了44.1%的CaW、87.7%的颈动脉粥样硬化和83%的正常颈动脉图像。矢状面和冠状面MPR显著提高了CaW的准确诊断率(76.3%-表1)与动脉粥样硬化和正常颈动脉相比,仅使用CTA轴向投影(3.0[3.0-4.0]vs 4.0[3.0-5.0];p<0.001和4.0[3.0-5-0];p<0.001)以及添加矢状面/冠状面MPR(4.0[3.0.5.0]vs 5.0[4.0-5.0])后,CaW诊断的确定性水平较低,p=0.01;和vs 4.0[4.0‐5.0],p<0.001)。添加3D MIP后,CaW与动脉粥样硬化以及正常颈动脉之间的确定性水平变得相似(分别为5.0[5.0‐5.0]vs 5.0[4.5‐5.0];p=0.61;和vs 5.0[5.0‑5.0],p=0.15)。CaW检测的评分者间一致性从k=0.46(0.35‐0.57)增加;p<0.05,使用轴向截面,k=0.80(0.69‐0.91);MPR组差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。与MPR(AUC=0.86(0.80-0.91),灵敏度=76%,特异性=96%,p<0.05)相比,单独轴向投影在CaW检测中的灵敏度较低(AUC=6.69(0.62-0.76),灵敏度=44%,特异性-95%,p<0.05),与正确诊断的CaW病例(n=70/93)相比,年龄更大(56[46‐61]vs 52[46‐57]岁,p=0.04),长度/基底比更低(0.51[0.49‐0.87]vs 0.92[0.74‐1.19],p<0.001)。CTA轴向平面单独检测CaW是不可靠的,并且增加矢状/冠状MPR和3D MIP对于提高准确诊断和读者感知的诊断确定性是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Abstract Number ‐ 50: Multiplane Reconstruction Modifies The Diagnostic Performance Of CTA Imaging In Carotid Web Cases
Carotid Web (CaW) represents an important and overlooked etiology for ischemic stroke and has been associated with high rates of stroke recurrence. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) has been shown to have comparable performance to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and has been suggested to be the non‐invasive imaging of choice for CaW detection. However, misdiagnosis has been demonstrated to be common even in specialized centers. We evaluated the impact of adding CTA multiplane reconstruction (MPR) andthree‐dimensional maximum intensity projection (3D MIP) reformat on the diagnostic performance of CTA in CaW detection. After exclusion of patients aged >65 years old and patients with no available/poor quality CTA,CaW cases (n = 31 consecutive patients leading to 31 ipsilateral carotids to the stroke derived from out prospective CaW database), as well as two other groups: 1)carotid atherosclerosis (n = 27consecutivepatients from out carotid stenting database leading to 27 carotids contralateral to the index lesion) and 2) consecutive normal carotid cases (n = 49 patients with normal carotids extracted from the electronic medical records for patients imaged due to suspected blunt cerebrovascular trauma) were included. All CTA images were deidentified and reviewed independently by three stroke neurologists to record the diagnosis and level of diagnostic certainty (in form of a scale (1[lowest]‐to‐5[highest]) after evaluating the CTA axial plane alone, then after sagittal and coronal planes (MPR) reconstructions, and then after evaluation of3D MIP reformatted images.The analyses were made for the total number of observations for all readers (93 CaWs, 81 atherosclerosis cases and 147 normal carotids). On reviewing CTA axial projection alone, raters correctly diagnosed 44.1% of CaW, 87.7% of carotid atherosclerosis and 83% of normal carotid images. Sagittal and coronal MPR significantly increased the rate of accurate CaW diagnosis (76.3%‐Table 1) The certainty level for CaW diagnosis was lower when compared to atherosclerosis as well as normal carotid using the CTA axial projection alone (3.0[3.0‐4.0] vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001 and vs 4.0[3.0‐5.0];p< 0.001) as well as after adding sagittal/coronal MPR (4.0[3.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.0‐5.0],p = 0.01; and vs 4.0[4.0‐5.0],p< 0.001). The certainty level became similar between CaW and atherosclerosis as well as normal carotids with the addition of 3D MIP (5.0[5.0‐5.0] vs 5.0[4.5‐5.0], p = 0.61; and vs 5.0[5.0‐5.0],p = 0.15) respectively. Inter‐rater agreement in CaW detection increased from k = 0.46(0.35‐0.57);p< 0.05usingaxial section to k = 0.80(0.69‐0.91);p< 0.05 with MPR. Axial projection alone had lower sensitivity in CaW detection (AUC = 0.69(0.62‐0.76),sensitivity = 44%,specificity = 95%,p< 0.05) compared to MPR (AUC = 0.86(0.80‐0.91),sensitivity = 76%,specificity = 96%,p< 0.05). Misdiagnosed CaW cases, after using all planes with 3D MIP (n = 23/93), were older (56[46‐61] vs 52[46‐57] years,p = 0.04) and lower length/base ratio (0.51[0.49‐0.87] vs 0.92[0.74‐1.19],p< 0.001) compared to the correctly diagnosed CaW cases (n = 70/93). CTA axial plane alone is unreliable to detect CaW and the addition of sagittal/coronal MPR and 3D MIPs are important to increase accurate diagnosis and perceived reader diagnostic certainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of HEmorrhage on CT versus MRI After ThrombEctomy: The HECATE study. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Therapy Effectiveness for Unruptured Saccular Intracranial Aneurysms. Large, Wide-Neck, Side-Wall Aneurysm Treatment in Canines Using NeuroCURE: A Novel Liquid Embolic. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual CLOTS Meeting: CLOTS 7.0, Madrid, Spain Catching Up With Time: Endovascular Treatment Beyond 24 Hours
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1