宇宙学与希尔伯特第六问题

IF 0.8 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Serbian Astronomical Journal Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.2298/saj2000043c
M. Ćirković
{"title":"宇宙学与希尔伯特第六问题","authors":"M. Ćirković","doi":"10.2298/saj2000043c","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been tantalizing indications from many quarters of physical cosmology that we are living in the multiverse – a huge set of cosmological domains (“universes”). What is the structure of this larger whole is an entirely open problem on the interface between physics and metaphysics. A goal of the present paper is to draw attention to the connection between this problem and an old and celebrated puzzle in mathematical physics. Among the unresolved problems David Hilbert posed in 1900 as a challenge for the dawning century, none is more philosophically controversial than the Sixth Problem, requiring the axiomatization of physical theories. In the new century and the new millennium, this problem has remained a challenge, usually swept under the rug as “not belonging to mathematics” (as if that impacts its epistemical status) or simply “unresolved”. Recent radical ontological/cosmological hypothesis of Max Tegmark, identifying mathematical and physical structures, might shed some new light onto this allegedly antiquated subject: it might be the case that the problem has already been solved, insofar we have formalized mathematical structures! While this can be seen as “cutting the Gordian knot” rather than patiently resolving the issue, we suggest that there are several advantages to taking Tegmark’s solution seriously, notably in the domain of (future) physics of the observer.","PeriodicalId":48878,"journal":{"name":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","volume":"200 1","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cosmology and Hilbert's sixth problem\",\"authors\":\"M. Ćirković\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/saj2000043c\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There have been tantalizing indications from many quarters of physical cosmology that we are living in the multiverse – a huge set of cosmological domains (“universes”). What is the structure of this larger whole is an entirely open problem on the interface between physics and metaphysics. A goal of the present paper is to draw attention to the connection between this problem and an old and celebrated puzzle in mathematical physics. Among the unresolved problems David Hilbert posed in 1900 as a challenge for the dawning century, none is more philosophically controversial than the Sixth Problem, requiring the axiomatization of physical theories. In the new century and the new millennium, this problem has remained a challenge, usually swept under the rug as “not belonging to mathematics” (as if that impacts its epistemical status) or simply “unresolved”. Recent radical ontological/cosmological hypothesis of Max Tegmark, identifying mathematical and physical structures, might shed some new light onto this allegedly antiquated subject: it might be the case that the problem has already been solved, insofar we have formalized mathematical structures! While this can be seen as “cutting the Gordian knot” rather than patiently resolving the issue, we suggest that there are several advantages to taking Tegmark’s solution seriously, notably in the domain of (future) physics of the observer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Serbian Astronomical Journal\",\"volume\":\"200 1\",\"pages\":\"43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Serbian Astronomical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/saj2000043c\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serbian Astronomical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/saj2000043c","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

物理宇宙学的许多方面都有诱人的迹象表明,我们生活在多元宇宙中——一组庞大的宇宙学领域(“宇宙”)。这个更大的整体的结构是什么,这是一个关于物理学和形而上学之间接口的完全开放的问题。本文的目的是引起人们对这个问题和数学物理中一个古老而著名的谜题之间的联系的关注。在大卫·希尔伯特于1900年提出的尚未解决的问题中,没有一个问题比第六个问题更具哲学争议性,它需要物理理论的公理化。在新世纪和新千年,这个问题仍然是一个挑战,通常被掩盖为“不属于数学”(好像这影响了它的认识地位)或只是“未解决”。马克斯·特格马克(Max Tegmark)最近提出的激进本体论/宇宙学假设,确定了数学和物理结构,可能会为这个所谓的过时主题提供一些新的线索:在我们已经将数学结构形式化的情况下,问题可能已经解决了!虽然这可以被视为“解开难题”,而不是耐心地解决问题,但我们认为,认真对待特格马克的解决方案有几个好处,尤其是在观察者的(未来)物理学领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cosmology and Hilbert's sixth problem
There have been tantalizing indications from many quarters of physical cosmology that we are living in the multiverse – a huge set of cosmological domains (“universes”). What is the structure of this larger whole is an entirely open problem on the interface between physics and metaphysics. A goal of the present paper is to draw attention to the connection between this problem and an old and celebrated puzzle in mathematical physics. Among the unresolved problems David Hilbert posed in 1900 as a challenge for the dawning century, none is more philosophically controversial than the Sixth Problem, requiring the axiomatization of physical theories. In the new century and the new millennium, this problem has remained a challenge, usually swept under the rug as “not belonging to mathematics” (as if that impacts its epistemical status) or simply “unresolved”. Recent radical ontological/cosmological hypothesis of Max Tegmark, identifying mathematical and physical structures, might shed some new light onto this allegedly antiquated subject: it might be the case that the problem has already been solved, insofar we have formalized mathematical structures! While this can be seen as “cutting the Gordian knot” rather than patiently resolving the issue, we suggest that there are several advantages to taking Tegmark’s solution seriously, notably in the domain of (future) physics of the observer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Serbian Astronomical Journal
Serbian Astronomical Journal ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Serbian Astronomical Journal publishes original observations and researches in all branches of astronomy. The journal publishes: Invited Reviews - review article on some up-to-date topic in astronomy, astrophysics and related fields (written upon invitation only), Original Scientific Papers - article in which are presented previously unpublished author''s own scientific results, Preliminary Reports - original scientific paper, but shorter in length and of preliminary nature, Professional Papers - articles offering experience useful for the improvement of professional practice i.e. article describing methods and techniques, software, presenting observational data, etc. In some cases the journal may publish other contributions, such as In Memoriam notes, Obituaries, Book Reviews, as well as Editorials, Addenda, Errata, Corrigenda, Retraction notes, etc.
期刊最新文献
A potential survival strategy during the late heavy bombardment Newly found Mayan records of astronomical phenomena in Dresden Codex A search for fast radio bursts associated with gamma-ray bursts using the YNAO 40-m radio telescope The influence of metallicity on helium and CO core masses in massive stars Astronomical observatory site selection using fuzzy AHP and BWM methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1