Vinasse作为甜菜钾肥来源及沙质土壤改良

IF 0.5 Q4 AGRONOMY Egyptian Journal of Agronomy Pub Date : 2020-10-19 DOI:10.21608/agro.2020.37407.1222
S. Khalil, B. Makhlouf, Khadiga I. M. El-Gabry
{"title":"Vinasse作为甜菜钾肥来源及沙质土壤改良","authors":"S. Khalil, B. Makhlouf, Khadiga I. M. El-Gabry","doi":"10.21608/agro.2020.37407.1222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two field experiments were conducted in a sandy soil at Al-Hossein Agricultural Farm located, Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road, Egypt, in 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, to check the possibility of using cane vinasse as a source of potassium fertilization for sugar beet, and its effect as an amendment on some properties of soil. A randomized complete block design was used. The present work included 13 treatments as follows: - 100% K2O: 48 kg K2O/fed as K2SO4 \"48% K2O\" (control). - Three treatments represent the sole application of 100% equivalent to 48 kg K2O/fed, in the form of raw (V1), photo-chemically (V2) and biologically (V3) treated vinasse, i.e. 708.0 l/fed, 708.0 l/fed and 817.7 l/fed, respectively. - Nine treatments, using 75, 50 and 25 % of the recommended rate as K2SO4 combined with 25, 50 and 75 %, successively, equivalent to 48 kg K2O/fed from each of V1, V2 and V3. The lowest value of HMF was recorded with V3,and phenolic compounds with V2. The maximum activity of dehydrogenase enzyme was found with adding (50% K2O+50% V3)/fed. Adding (50% K2O+50% V3) significantly increased root yield/fed. The different treatments including V3 markedly increased sugar yield/fed, as compared to that gained with 100% K2O/fed, in both seasons. In the final, the addition of [50% of the recommended rate of K-fertilizer (24 kg K2O) as K2SO4+50% of the biologically treated vinasse (408.85 liters)/fed] could be recommended to get economical root and sugar yields, which means saving 50% of mineral potassium sulphate required for sugar beet crop.","PeriodicalId":42226,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Vinasse as a Source of Potassium Fertilization for Sugar Beet and a Sandy Soil Amendment\",\"authors\":\"S. Khalil, B. Makhlouf, Khadiga I. M. El-Gabry\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/agro.2020.37407.1222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two field experiments were conducted in a sandy soil at Al-Hossein Agricultural Farm located, Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road, Egypt, in 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, to check the possibility of using cane vinasse as a source of potassium fertilization for sugar beet, and its effect as an amendment on some properties of soil. A randomized complete block design was used. The present work included 13 treatments as follows: - 100% K2O: 48 kg K2O/fed as K2SO4 \\\"48% K2O\\\" (control). - Three treatments represent the sole application of 100% equivalent to 48 kg K2O/fed, in the form of raw (V1), photo-chemically (V2) and biologically (V3) treated vinasse, i.e. 708.0 l/fed, 708.0 l/fed and 817.7 l/fed, respectively. - Nine treatments, using 75, 50 and 25 % of the recommended rate as K2SO4 combined with 25, 50 and 75 %, successively, equivalent to 48 kg K2O/fed from each of V1, V2 and V3. The lowest value of HMF was recorded with V3,and phenolic compounds with V2. The maximum activity of dehydrogenase enzyme was found with adding (50% K2O+50% V3)/fed. Adding (50% K2O+50% V3) significantly increased root yield/fed. The different treatments including V3 markedly increased sugar yield/fed, as compared to that gained with 100% K2O/fed, in both seasons. In the final, the addition of [50% of the recommended rate of K-fertilizer (24 kg K2O) as K2SO4+50% of the biologically treated vinasse (408.85 liters)/fed] could be recommended to get economical root and sugar yields, which means saving 50% of mineral potassium sulphate required for sugar beet crop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/agro.2020.37407.1222\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/agro.2020.37407.1222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2017/2018年和2018/2019年,在埃及开罗-亚历山大沙漠路Al Hossein农业农场的沙质土壤中进行了两次田间试验,以检查使用甘蔗汁作为甜菜钾肥来源的可能性,以及其作为改良剂对土壤某些性质的影响。采用随机完全区组设计。目前的工作包括13个处理,如下:-100%K2O:48kg K2O/以K2SO4“48%K2O”(对照)的形式进料三种处理代表了以原料(V1)、光化学(V2)和生物(V3)处理的酒糟形式单独施用100%相当于48 kg K2O/饲料,即分别为708.0 l/饲料、708.0 l//饲料和817.7 l/饲料九个处理,使用推荐速率的75%、50%和25%作为K2SO4,依次与25%、50%和75%相结合,相当于48 kg K2O/从V1、V2和V3中的每一个进料。HMF的最低值记录为V3,酚类化合物记录为V2。添加(50%K2O+50%V3)/日粮的脱氢酶活性最高。添加(50%K2O+50%V3)显著提高了根产量/日粮。在两个季节,与100%K2O/饲料相比,包括V3在内的不同处理显著提高了糖产量/饲料。最后,可以建议添加[50%的推荐钾肥(24kg K2O)作为K2SO4+50%的生物处理过的酒糟(408.85升)/饲料],以获得经济的根产量和糖产量,这意味着节省甜菜作物所需的50%的矿物硫酸钾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using Vinasse as a Source of Potassium Fertilization for Sugar Beet and a Sandy Soil Amendment
Two field experiments were conducted in a sandy soil at Al-Hossein Agricultural Farm located, Cairo-Alexandria Desert Road, Egypt, in 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 seasons, to check the possibility of using cane vinasse as a source of potassium fertilization for sugar beet, and its effect as an amendment on some properties of soil. A randomized complete block design was used. The present work included 13 treatments as follows: - 100% K2O: 48 kg K2O/fed as K2SO4 "48% K2O" (control). - Three treatments represent the sole application of 100% equivalent to 48 kg K2O/fed, in the form of raw (V1), photo-chemically (V2) and biologically (V3) treated vinasse, i.e. 708.0 l/fed, 708.0 l/fed and 817.7 l/fed, respectively. - Nine treatments, using 75, 50 and 25 % of the recommended rate as K2SO4 combined with 25, 50 and 75 %, successively, equivalent to 48 kg K2O/fed from each of V1, V2 and V3. The lowest value of HMF was recorded with V3,and phenolic compounds with V2. The maximum activity of dehydrogenase enzyme was found with adding (50% K2O+50% V3)/fed. Adding (50% K2O+50% V3) significantly increased root yield/fed. The different treatments including V3 markedly increased sugar yield/fed, as compared to that gained with 100% K2O/fed, in both seasons. In the final, the addition of [50% of the recommended rate of K-fertilizer (24 kg K2O) as K2SO4+50% of the biologically treated vinasse (408.85 liters)/fed] could be recommended to get economical root and sugar yields, which means saving 50% of mineral potassium sulphate required for sugar beet crop.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Phyto-extraction Potential of Duranta erecta's Against Heavy Metal Assisting by EDTA and Citric Acid for Mitigating Industrial Polluted Soil Exploring genetic variation through line x tester analysis of sunflower genotypes for yield and oil traits under adverse environment Environmental stability and adaptation of several rice (Oryza Sativa L.) cultivars with different climate change . The possibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles in agricultural activities in Turkey Response of Growth, Productivity and Quality For Some Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.) Cultivars to Different Irrigation Regimes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1