加纳物理治疗临床年级学生的学习风格偏好

IF 0.4 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES African Journal of Health Professions Education Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i3.1309
D. B. A. Afrifa, BSc J Quartey, PhD S Kwakye, J. Quartey
{"title":"加纳物理治疗临床年级学生的学习风格偏好","authors":"D. B. A. Afrifa, BSc J Quartey, PhD S Kwakye, J. Quartey","doi":"10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i3.1309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nBackground. Learning style is the manner by which one learns. Every student has a different and unique learning style. However, the educational implication of learning style preferences has been a source of controversy among researchers and educators.Objectives. To determine the learning style preferences of clinical year physiotherapy students.Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 82 undergraduate physiotherapy students from two universities in Ghana. A data-capturing form was used to obtain participants’ sociodemographic information, while the Kolb learning style questionnaire was used to determine the learning style preferences of the students. The χ2 statistic was used to determine the association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as between level of study and learning style preferences. \nResults. The participants comprised 43 (52.4%) male students and 39 (47.6%) female students. Eight (9.8%) students preferred the accommodating learning style, 46 (56.0%) preferred the diverging learning style, 15 (18.3%) preferred the assimilating learning style and 13 (15.9%) preferred the converging learning style. There was a significant association between gender and preferred learning style (p=0.027), but no significant association between level of study and preferred learning style (p=0.179). \nConclusion. This study revealed that the diverging learning style was the most preferred style, followed by the assimilating learning style. However, there was no association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as level of study and learning style preferences. Further research should be conducted to find the association between the learning environments and the learning style preferences. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":43683,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning style preferences among clinical year physiotherapy students in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"D. B. A. Afrifa, BSc J Quartey, PhD S Kwakye, J. Quartey\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i3.1309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n \\nBackground. Learning style is the manner by which one learns. Every student has a different and unique learning style. However, the educational implication of learning style preferences has been a source of controversy among researchers and educators.Objectives. To determine the learning style preferences of clinical year physiotherapy students.Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 82 undergraduate physiotherapy students from two universities in Ghana. A data-capturing form was used to obtain participants’ sociodemographic information, while the Kolb learning style questionnaire was used to determine the learning style preferences of the students. The χ2 statistic was used to determine the association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as between level of study and learning style preferences. \\nResults. The participants comprised 43 (52.4%) male students and 39 (47.6%) female students. Eight (9.8%) students preferred the accommodating learning style, 46 (56.0%) preferred the diverging learning style, 15 (18.3%) preferred the assimilating learning style and 13 (15.9%) preferred the converging learning style. There was a significant association between gender and preferred learning style (p=0.027), but no significant association between level of study and preferred learning style (p=0.179). \\nConclusion. This study revealed that the diverging learning style was the most preferred style, followed by the assimilating learning style. However, there was no association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as level of study and learning style preferences. Further research should be conducted to find the association between the learning environments and the learning style preferences. \\n \\n \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Health Professions Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Health Professions Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i3.1309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Health Professions Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/ajhpe.2022.v14i3.1309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景学习风格是一个人学习的方式。每个学生都有不同的、独特的学习风格。然而,学习风格偏好的教育含义一直是研究人员和教育工作者争论的焦点。目标。确定物理治疗临床年级学生的学习风格偏好。方法。这项横断面研究是在加纳两所大学的82名物理治疗本科生中进行的。数据采集表用于获取参与者的社会人口统计信息,而Kolb学习风格问卷用于确定学生的学习风格偏好。χ2统计用于确定性别与学习风格偏好之间的关联,以及学习水平与学习风格喜好之间的关联。后果参与者包括43名(52.4%)男生和39名(47.6%)女生。8名(9.8%)学生更喜欢适应型学习方式,46名(56.0%)学生更倾向于发散型学习方式、15名(18.3%)学生喜欢同化型学习方式和13名(15.9%)学生倾向于融合型学习方式。性别与偏好学习风格之间存在显著相关性(p=0.027),但学习水平与偏好学习方式之间没有显著相关性(p=0.179)。研究表明,发散式学习风格是最受欢迎的学习风格,其次是同化式学习风格。然而,性别与学习风格偏好、学习水平和学习风格偏好之间没有关联。应进一步研究学习环境与学习风格偏好之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Learning style preferences among clinical year physiotherapy students in Ghana
Background. Learning style is the manner by which one learns. Every student has a different and unique learning style. However, the educational implication of learning style preferences has been a source of controversy among researchers and educators.Objectives. To determine the learning style preferences of clinical year physiotherapy students.Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 82 undergraduate physiotherapy students from two universities in Ghana. A data-capturing form was used to obtain participants’ sociodemographic information, while the Kolb learning style questionnaire was used to determine the learning style preferences of the students. The χ2 statistic was used to determine the association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as between level of study and learning style preferences. Results. The participants comprised 43 (52.4%) male students and 39 (47.6%) female students. Eight (9.8%) students preferred the accommodating learning style, 46 (56.0%) preferred the diverging learning style, 15 (18.3%) preferred the assimilating learning style and 13 (15.9%) preferred the converging learning style. There was a significant association between gender and preferred learning style (p=0.027), but no significant association between level of study and preferred learning style (p=0.179). Conclusion. This study revealed that the diverging learning style was the most preferred style, followed by the assimilating learning style. However, there was no association between gender and learning style preferences, as well as level of study and learning style preferences. Further research should be conducted to find the association between the learning environments and the learning style preferences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Health Professions Education
African Journal of Health Professions Education HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of a decentralised clinical training programme (DCTP) at a university of technology in South Africa: Implications for health science education and clinical practice How do medical students without formal training in empathy development understand empathy in the context of patient care? Perceptions of staff and students of the role of clinical simulation on students’ ability to perform academically Surgical videos used for face-to-face and virtual oral assessment: experiences of examiners and trainees. Exploring student midwives’ experiences regarding completion of the midwifery register at a nursing college in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1