{"title":"市长秀与17世纪中期伦敦Clothworkers公司的政治","authors":"Edward Legon","doi":"10.1080/03058034.2022.2106679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article uses detail from the records of the Clothworkers’ Company to explore the tensions that lay beneath the surface of the elaborate Lord Mayors’ Shows of Sir John Ireton in 1658 and Sir John Robinson in 1662. Nearly one hundred members of the Company failed to pay their contributions (or ‘fines’) towards the Shows, leading to a shortfall in funding that the Company's Court of Assistants sought to remedy through protracted and expensive institutional and legal proceedings. The article seeks explanations for such behaviour. While the invidiousness of financial burdens and the inability of members to pay their fines are instructive, explicit evidence of enduring divisions between elements of the Company's hierarchy demonstrate how institutional non-participation is inextricable from wider political and religious issues. In the final analysis, suggestive evidence of radical tendencies among the Clothworkers’ membership conveys that the Shows of 1658 and 1662 could be vectors of opposition to the regimes of which Ireton and Robinson were representative, as well as the extravagant Shows themselves.","PeriodicalId":43904,"journal":{"name":"London Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lord Mayor's Show and the Politics of London's Clothworkers’ Company in the Mid-Seventeenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Edward Legon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03058034.2022.2106679\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article uses detail from the records of the Clothworkers’ Company to explore the tensions that lay beneath the surface of the elaborate Lord Mayors’ Shows of Sir John Ireton in 1658 and Sir John Robinson in 1662. Nearly one hundred members of the Company failed to pay their contributions (or ‘fines’) towards the Shows, leading to a shortfall in funding that the Company's Court of Assistants sought to remedy through protracted and expensive institutional and legal proceedings. The article seeks explanations for such behaviour. While the invidiousness of financial burdens and the inability of members to pay their fines are instructive, explicit evidence of enduring divisions between elements of the Company's hierarchy demonstrate how institutional non-participation is inextricable from wider political and religious issues. In the final analysis, suggestive evidence of radical tendencies among the Clothworkers’ membership conveys that the Shows of 1658 and 1662 could be vectors of opposition to the regimes of which Ireton and Robinson were representative, as well as the extravagant Shows themselves.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43904,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"London Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"London Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2106679\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"London Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2106679","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Lord Mayor's Show and the Politics of London's Clothworkers’ Company in the Mid-Seventeenth Century
This article uses detail from the records of the Clothworkers’ Company to explore the tensions that lay beneath the surface of the elaborate Lord Mayors’ Shows of Sir John Ireton in 1658 and Sir John Robinson in 1662. Nearly one hundred members of the Company failed to pay their contributions (or ‘fines’) towards the Shows, leading to a shortfall in funding that the Company's Court of Assistants sought to remedy through protracted and expensive institutional and legal proceedings. The article seeks explanations for such behaviour. While the invidiousness of financial burdens and the inability of members to pay their fines are instructive, explicit evidence of enduring divisions between elements of the Company's hierarchy demonstrate how institutional non-participation is inextricable from wider political and religious issues. In the final analysis, suggestive evidence of radical tendencies among the Clothworkers’ membership conveys that the Shows of 1658 and 1662 could be vectors of opposition to the regimes of which Ireton and Robinson were representative, as well as the extravagant Shows themselves.
期刊介绍:
The scope of The London Journal is broad, embracing all aspects of metropolitan society past and present, including comparative studies. The Journal is multi-disciplinary and is intended to interest all concerned with the understanding and enrichment of London and Londoners: historians, geographers, economists, sociologists, social workers, political scientists, planners, educationalist, archaeologists, conservationists, architects, and all those taking an interest in the fine and performing arts, the natural environment and in commentaries on metropolitan life in fiction as in fact