疫情期间媒体的语言能力——中介语方面

Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.2478/saec-2022-0003
I. Cretu
{"title":"疫情期间媒体的语言能力——中介语方面","authors":"I. Cretu","doi":"10.2478/saec-2022-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Free media is essential for a democratic society. The limitations of media freedom and freedom of speech despite of pluralism of the press in former communist countries in Southeast of Europe, including Romania, are related to media ownership, but also with gaps in the national legislation. But it is also not to be overlooked that today not only in these countries the original information journalism has often changed to an entertainment journalism. In times of crisis, sober and factual information is particularly important. This article examines the structures that occur in reports and news about Corona, in the Romanian media and also in comparable language and style elements in the German press. The examples concern the language of the online media of the most popular information sources (from publications as well as from audio media and news agencies). The criteria of the chosen examples are mainly lexical aspects, but also stylistic differences. The characteristics of media language during the Corona pandemic include specific constructions such as the use of new formations and technical terms, as well as compound words and foreign words, but also differences in the style of reporting. The observed difference in the style of reporting contributes to increased uncertainty and feelings of fear during Corona times. The flood of information in particular creates the risk of narcotic dysfunction in the mass media. There is the possibility of under informing or even failure of the information function of the media due to different media usage and the use of information sources that often do not correspond to quality journalism. In times of crisis, the threat to freedom of the press also increases. The conclusion of the article is that a better media education and media training is needed to avoid manipulation but also the tabloidization of the press.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language competence in media during the pandemic – interlanguage aspects\",\"authors\":\"I. Cretu\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/saec-2022-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Free media is essential for a democratic society. The limitations of media freedom and freedom of speech despite of pluralism of the press in former communist countries in Southeast of Europe, including Romania, are related to media ownership, but also with gaps in the national legislation. But it is also not to be overlooked that today not only in these countries the original information journalism has often changed to an entertainment journalism. In times of crisis, sober and factual information is particularly important. This article examines the structures that occur in reports and news about Corona, in the Romanian media and also in comparable language and style elements in the German press. The examples concern the language of the online media of the most popular information sources (from publications as well as from audio media and news agencies). The criteria of the chosen examples are mainly lexical aspects, but also stylistic differences. The characteristics of media language during the Corona pandemic include specific constructions such as the use of new formations and technical terms, as well as compound words and foreign words, but also differences in the style of reporting. The observed difference in the style of reporting contributes to increased uncertainty and feelings of fear during Corona times. The flood of information in particular creates the risk of narcotic dysfunction in the mass media. There is the possibility of under informing or even failure of the information function of the media due to different media usage and the use of information sources that often do not correspond to quality journalism. In times of crisis, the threat to freedom of the press also increases. The conclusion of the article is that a better media education and media training is needed to avoid manipulation but also the tabloidization of the press.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2022-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/saec-2022-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要自由媒体对民主社会至关重要。尽管包括罗马尼亚在内的欧洲东南部前共产主义国家的新闻多元化,但媒体自由和言论自由受到限制,这与媒体所有权有关,但也与国家立法的差距有关。但同样不可忽视的是,今天不仅在这些国家,最初的信息新闻往往已经转变为娱乐新闻。在危机时期,冷静和实事求是的信息尤为重要。本文考察了关于科罗纳的报道和新闻、罗马尼亚媒体以及德国媒体中类似语言和风格元素中出现的结构。这些例子涉及最受欢迎的信息来源(来自出版物以及音频媒体和新闻机构)的在线媒体的语言。所选例子的标准主要是词汇方面,但也有文体差异。新冠疫情期间媒体语言的特点包括特定的结构,如使用新的形式和技术术语,以及复合词和外来词,但也包括报道风格的差异。在科罗纳时代,观察到的报道风格的差异导致了不确定性和恐惧感的增加。信息的泛滥尤其在大众媒体中造成了麻醉功能障碍的风险。由于不同的媒体使用和信息来源的使用往往与高质量的新闻报道不符,媒体的信息功能可能会被低估,甚至失败。在危机时期,对新闻自由的威胁也在增加。文章的结论是,需要更好的媒体教育和媒体培训,以避免操纵媒体,也避免媒体小报化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Language competence in media during the pandemic – interlanguage aspects
Abstract Free media is essential for a democratic society. The limitations of media freedom and freedom of speech despite of pluralism of the press in former communist countries in Southeast of Europe, including Romania, are related to media ownership, but also with gaps in the national legislation. But it is also not to be overlooked that today not only in these countries the original information journalism has often changed to an entertainment journalism. In times of crisis, sober and factual information is particularly important. This article examines the structures that occur in reports and news about Corona, in the Romanian media and also in comparable language and style elements in the German press. The examples concern the language of the online media of the most popular information sources (from publications as well as from audio media and news agencies). The criteria of the chosen examples are mainly lexical aspects, but also stylistic differences. The characteristics of media language during the Corona pandemic include specific constructions such as the use of new formations and technical terms, as well as compound words and foreign words, but also differences in the style of reporting. The observed difference in the style of reporting contributes to increased uncertainty and feelings of fear during Corona times. The flood of information in particular creates the risk of narcotic dysfunction in the mass media. There is the possibility of under informing or even failure of the information function of the media due to different media usage and the use of information sources that often do not correspond to quality journalism. In times of crisis, the threat to freedom of the press also increases. The conclusion of the article is that a better media education and media training is needed to avoid manipulation but also the tabloidization of the press.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1