用证据照亮直觉:评估维多利亚博物馆展览中的收藏风险

Q2 Arts and Humanities AICCM Bulletin Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246
Alice Cannon, R. Waller
{"title":"用证据照亮直觉:评估维多利亚博物馆展览中的收藏风险","authors":"Alice Cannon, R. Waller","doi":"10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collection risk assessments were conducted for each of Museum Victoria’s three exhibition venues, using a method based on the Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model (CPRAM) to identify, characterise, and quantify risks. The results of the assessments showed that cumulative light exposure was, by far, the highest risk to collections on display. However, other results were less intuitive. Water leaks and pest infestations made up a large percentage of recorded incident reports but ranked very low in terms of overall expected loss to the collection. Loss due to seismic activity ranked higher than expected, given the popular perception that seismic activity need not concern those living in the Melbourne region. The assessments also highlighted which object populations are more likely to suffer damage. Plastic materials, fluid-preserved specimens, objects on open display, and objects on very long-term display were found to be most at risk. The results of the assessments were illuminating and will inform future exhibition design and maintenance programmes. Additionally, the results identified existing data gaps and thus also identified areas of research that will benefit collection care. Such research—for example, microfading tests—will enable future risk estimates to become increasingly realistic and validated.","PeriodicalId":7847,"journal":{"name":"AICCM Bulletin","volume":"38 1","pages":"25 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illuminating intuition with evidence: assessing collection risks within Museums Victoria's exhibitions\",\"authors\":\"Alice Cannon, R. Waller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Collection risk assessments were conducted for each of Museum Victoria’s three exhibition venues, using a method based on the Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model (CPRAM) to identify, characterise, and quantify risks. The results of the assessments showed that cumulative light exposure was, by far, the highest risk to collections on display. However, other results were less intuitive. Water leaks and pest infestations made up a large percentage of recorded incident reports but ranked very low in terms of overall expected loss to the collection. Loss due to seismic activity ranked higher than expected, given the popular perception that seismic activity need not concern those living in the Melbourne region. The assessments also highlighted which object populations are more likely to suffer damage. Plastic materials, fluid-preserved specimens, objects on open display, and objects on very long-term display were found to be most at risk. The results of the assessments were illuminating and will inform future exhibition design and maintenance programmes. Additionally, the results identified existing data gaps and thus also identified areas of research that will benefit collection care. Such research—for example, microfading tests—will enable future risk estimates to become increasingly realistic and validated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AICCM Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"25 - 35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AICCM Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AICCM Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10344233.2017.1347246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用基于文化财产风险分析模型(CPRAM)的方法,对维多利亚博物馆的三个展览场地中的每一个进行了收藏风险评估,以识别、表征和量化风险。评估结果显示,到目前为止,累积曝光是展出藏品的最高风险。然而,其他结果则不那么直观。漏水和虫害在记录的事件报告中占很大比例,但就收集的总体预期损失而言,排名非常低。地震活动造成的损失高于预期,因为人们普遍认为地震活动不必与墨尔本地区的居民有关。评估还强调了哪些目标群体更有可能遭受损害。塑料材料、流体保存的标本、公开展出的物品和长期展出的物品被发现风险最大。评估结果很有启发性,将为未来的展览设计和维护计划提供信息。此外,研究结果确定了现有的数据差距,从而也确定了有利于收集护理的研究领域。这样的研究——例如,微加载测试——将使未来的风险估计变得越来越现实和有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illuminating intuition with evidence: assessing collection risks within Museums Victoria's exhibitions
Collection risk assessments were conducted for each of Museum Victoria’s three exhibition venues, using a method based on the Cultural Property Risk Analysis Model (CPRAM) to identify, characterise, and quantify risks. The results of the assessments showed that cumulative light exposure was, by far, the highest risk to collections on display. However, other results were less intuitive. Water leaks and pest infestations made up a large percentage of recorded incident reports but ranked very low in terms of overall expected loss to the collection. Loss due to seismic activity ranked higher than expected, given the popular perception that seismic activity need not concern those living in the Melbourne region. The assessments also highlighted which object populations are more likely to suffer damage. Plastic materials, fluid-preserved specimens, objects on open display, and objects on very long-term display were found to be most at risk. The results of the assessments were illuminating and will inform future exhibition design and maintenance programmes. Additionally, the results identified existing data gaps and thus also identified areas of research that will benefit collection care. Such research—for example, microfading tests—will enable future risk estimates to become increasingly realistic and validated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AICCM Bulletin
AICCM Bulletin Arts and Humanities-Museology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Beyond Repair – Deaccession and the Management of Plastics New Dimensions in Conservation Imaging: Combining Photogrammetry and Photometric Stereo for 3D Documentation of Heritage Artefacts The Preservation of Tracing Paper: A case Study of TRA Archives Looking through X-Rays: The study of underlying painting in the oeuvre of Chen Cheng-po Conservation and analysis of textiles recovered from exhumed human remains after more than a century of burial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1