婚礼舞蹈框架的历史

Q4 Arts and Humanities Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.1086/707431
B. Goodman
{"title":"婚礼舞蹈框架的历史","authors":"B. Goodman","doi":"10.1086/707431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"e Wedding Dance has had at least three frames during its lifetime. In this essay, we refer to them as the original frame, the gilded frame, and the current frame. Little is known about Bruegel’s framing practices, but the condition of the perimeter of the painting suggests that the original frame was separate rather than engaged.269 e earliest photograph of e Wedding Dance in a frame (fig. 9.1) is from 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting. In this photograph, the painting is in a gilded frame, hanging in the museum. e right edge of the painting’s surface is captured in specular light,270 revealing abrasion along the perimeter of the painting (fig. 9.2). is damage is characteristic of rebate rub (or rabbet rub), a term that refers to abrasion of the paint caused by the lip of the frame that holds the painting in place. Since the rebate rub is visible and does not align with the gilded frame’s edge, it was likely caused by an earlier frame with a slightly smaller opening, or sight size. However, we do not know whether this earlier frame was original or a later replacement. In short, it is unknown how many other frames were paired with e Wedding Dance between the original frame and the gilded frame. As seen in the photograph, the gilded frame has a convex profile, or torus, Above FIG 9.1 e Wedding Dance in the gilded frame in 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting","PeriodicalId":36609,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707431","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A History of Frames for The Wedding Dance\",\"authors\":\"B. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/707431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"e Wedding Dance has had at least three frames during its lifetime. In this essay, we refer to them as the original frame, the gilded frame, and the current frame. Little is known about Bruegel’s framing practices, but the condition of the perimeter of the painting suggests that the original frame was separate rather than engaged.269 e earliest photograph of e Wedding Dance in a frame (fig. 9.1) is from 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting. In this photograph, the painting is in a gilded frame, hanging in the museum. e right edge of the painting’s surface is captured in specular light,270 revealing abrasion along the perimeter of the painting (fig. 9.2). is damage is characteristic of rebate rub (or rabbet rub), a term that refers to abrasion of the paint caused by the lip of the frame that holds the painting in place. Since the rebate rub is visible and does not align with the gilded frame’s edge, it was likely caused by an earlier frame with a slightly smaller opening, or sight size. However, we do not know whether this earlier frame was original or a later replacement. In short, it is unknown how many other frames were paired with e Wedding Dance between the original frame and the gilded frame. As seen in the photograph, the gilded frame has a convex profile, or torus, Above FIG 9.1 e Wedding Dance in the gilded frame in 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting\",\"PeriodicalId\":36609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707431\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/707431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/707431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

e《婚礼舞蹈》在其一生中至少有三个框架。在本文中,我们将它们称为原始框架、镀金框架和当前框架。关于勃鲁盖尔的装帧实践,人们知之甚少,但画作周边的状况表明,原始的画框是分开的,而不是固定的。269 e最早的《婚礼舞蹈》画框照片(图9.1)是1930年,也就是国防情报局获得这幅画的那一年。在这张照片中,这幅画挂在博物馆的镀金框架中。e在镜面光中捕捉到画作表面的右边缘,270显示出沿着画作周边的磨损(图9.2)。损伤是槽口摩擦(或槽口摩擦)的特征,该术语指的是由固定画作的框架边缘引起的油漆磨损。由于槽口摩擦是可见的,并且与镀金框架的边缘不对齐,这可能是由早期开口或视线尺寸稍小的框架引起的。然而,我们不知道这个早期的框架是原始的还是后来的替代品。简言之,在原始框架和镀金框架之间,还不知道有多少其他框架与e Wedding Dance配对。如照片所示,镀金框架有一个凸起的轮廓,或圆环,上图9.1 e 1930年,也就是国防情报局获得这幅画的那一年,镀金框架中的婚礼舞蹈
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A History of Frames for The Wedding Dance
e Wedding Dance has had at least three frames during its lifetime. In this essay, we refer to them as the original frame, the gilded frame, and the current frame. Little is known about Bruegel’s framing practices, but the condition of the perimeter of the painting suggests that the original frame was separate rather than engaged.269 e earliest photograph of e Wedding Dance in a frame (fig. 9.1) is from 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting. In this photograph, the painting is in a gilded frame, hanging in the museum. e right edge of the painting’s surface is captured in specular light,270 revealing abrasion along the perimeter of the painting (fig. 9.2). is damage is characteristic of rebate rub (or rabbet rub), a term that refers to abrasion of the paint caused by the lip of the frame that holds the painting in place. Since the rebate rub is visible and does not align with the gilded frame’s edge, it was likely caused by an earlier frame with a slightly smaller opening, or sight size. However, we do not know whether this earlier frame was original or a later replacement. In short, it is unknown how many other frames were paired with e Wedding Dance between the original frame and the gilded frame. As seen in the photograph, the gilded frame has a convex profile, or torus, Above FIG 9.1 e Wedding Dance in the gilded frame in 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts
Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Thinking Globally, Acting Locally Introduction Revisiting Still I Rise Introduction Julie Buffalohead and “Tussles” in Contemporary Native American Art
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1