{"title":"婚礼舞蹈框架的历史","authors":"B. Goodman","doi":"10.1086/707431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"e Wedding Dance has had at least three frames during its lifetime. In this essay, we refer to them as the original frame, the gilded frame, and the current frame. Little is known about Bruegel’s framing practices, but the condition of the perimeter of the painting suggests that the original frame was separate rather than engaged.269 e earliest photograph of e Wedding Dance in a frame (fig. 9.1) is from 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting. In this photograph, the painting is in a gilded frame, hanging in the museum. e right edge of the painting’s surface is captured in specular light,270 revealing abrasion along the perimeter of the painting (fig. 9.2). is damage is characteristic of rebate rub (or rabbet rub), a term that refers to abrasion of the paint caused by the lip of the frame that holds the painting in place. Since the rebate rub is visible and does not align with the gilded frame’s edge, it was likely caused by an earlier frame with a slightly smaller opening, or sight size. However, we do not know whether this earlier frame was original or a later replacement. In short, it is unknown how many other frames were paired with e Wedding Dance between the original frame and the gilded frame. As seen in the photograph, the gilded frame has a convex profile, or torus, Above FIG 9.1 e Wedding Dance in the gilded frame in 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting","PeriodicalId":36609,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707431","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A History of Frames for The Wedding Dance\",\"authors\":\"B. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/707431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"e Wedding Dance has had at least three frames during its lifetime. In this essay, we refer to them as the original frame, the gilded frame, and the current frame. Little is known about Bruegel’s framing practices, but the condition of the perimeter of the painting suggests that the original frame was separate rather than engaged.269 e earliest photograph of e Wedding Dance in a frame (fig. 9.1) is from 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting. In this photograph, the painting is in a gilded frame, hanging in the museum. e right edge of the painting’s surface is captured in specular light,270 revealing abrasion along the perimeter of the painting (fig. 9.2). is damage is characteristic of rebate rub (or rabbet rub), a term that refers to abrasion of the paint caused by the lip of the frame that holds the painting in place. Since the rebate rub is visible and does not align with the gilded frame’s edge, it was likely caused by an earlier frame with a slightly smaller opening, or sight size. However, we do not know whether this earlier frame was original or a later replacement. In short, it is unknown how many other frames were paired with e Wedding Dance between the original frame and the gilded frame. As seen in the photograph, the gilded frame has a convex profile, or torus, Above FIG 9.1 e Wedding Dance in the gilded frame in 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting\",\"PeriodicalId\":36609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707431\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/707431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Detroit Institute of Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/707431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
e《婚礼舞蹈》在其一生中至少有三个框架。在本文中,我们将它们称为原始框架、镀金框架和当前框架。关于勃鲁盖尔的装帧实践,人们知之甚少,但画作周边的状况表明,原始的画框是分开的,而不是固定的。269 e最早的《婚礼舞蹈》画框照片(图9.1)是1930年,也就是国防情报局获得这幅画的那一年。在这张照片中,这幅画挂在博物馆的镀金框架中。e在镜面光中捕捉到画作表面的右边缘,270显示出沿着画作周边的磨损(图9.2)。损伤是槽口摩擦(或槽口摩擦)的特征,该术语指的是由固定画作的框架边缘引起的油漆磨损。由于槽口摩擦是可见的,并且与镀金框架的边缘不对齐,这可能是由早期开口或视线尺寸稍小的框架引起的。然而,我们不知道这个早期的框架是原始的还是后来的替代品。简言之,在原始框架和镀金框架之间,还不知道有多少其他框架与e Wedding Dance配对。如照片所示,镀金框架有一个凸起的轮廓,或圆环,上图9.1 e 1930年,也就是国防情报局获得这幅画的那一年,镀金框架中的婚礼舞蹈
e Wedding Dance has had at least three frames during its lifetime. In this essay, we refer to them as the original frame, the gilded frame, and the current frame. Little is known about Bruegel’s framing practices, but the condition of the perimeter of the painting suggests that the original frame was separate rather than engaged.269 e earliest photograph of e Wedding Dance in a frame (fig. 9.1) is from 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting. In this photograph, the painting is in a gilded frame, hanging in the museum. e right edge of the painting’s surface is captured in specular light,270 revealing abrasion along the perimeter of the painting (fig. 9.2). is damage is characteristic of rebate rub (or rabbet rub), a term that refers to abrasion of the paint caused by the lip of the frame that holds the painting in place. Since the rebate rub is visible and does not align with the gilded frame’s edge, it was likely caused by an earlier frame with a slightly smaller opening, or sight size. However, we do not know whether this earlier frame was original or a later replacement. In short, it is unknown how many other frames were paired with e Wedding Dance between the original frame and the gilded frame. As seen in the photograph, the gilded frame has a convex profile, or torus, Above FIG 9.1 e Wedding Dance in the gilded frame in 1930, the year the DIA acquired the painting