不同配比的硅酸盐水泥和硅酸钙基水泥的抗辐射性能

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Endodontic Journal Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.14744/eej.2021.72691
Cholkamol Sarunket, D. Banomyong, Piyawat Vibulcharoenkitja, S. Sutimuntanakul
{"title":"不同配比的硅酸盐水泥和硅酸钙基水泥的抗辐射性能","authors":"Cholkamol Sarunket, D. Banomyong, Piyawat Vibulcharoenkitja, S. Sutimuntanakul","doi":"10.14744/eej.2021.72691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The present study aimed to compare the radiopacity of Portland cement (PC) or calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) with different mixed radiopacifiers [bismuth oxide (BO)/ tantalum oxide (TO) and zirconium oxide (ZO)/barium sulfate (BS)] in a ratio of 1:1 or 1:2, with the 3 mm aluminium thickness (mmAl) acceptable value of ISO 6876:2012. Methods: PC and CSC mixed with different ratios of radiopacifiers were evaluated. One of high radiopacity radiopacifiers, BO or TO, was mixed with one of low radiopacity radiopacifiers, ZO or BS, in ratio of 1:1 and 1:2. PC or CSC powder, 1.6 g, was added into 0.4 g mixed radiopacifiers. Disc-shaped specimens of 1-mm thickness were prepared by mixing PC or CSC powder containing radiopacifiers with distilled water; the radiopacity was measured according to ISO 6876:2012. One-way ANOVA/Tukey's test and Welch ANOVA/Games-Howell test were used to compare the radiopacity among the groups. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: PC groups had a higher radiopacity than CSC groups with the same radiopacifiers and ratio. BO groups showed higher radiopacity than TO groups. The groups with 1:1 ratio provided a higher radiopacity than 1:2 ratio groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: All tested radiopacifiers revealed adequate radiopacity ranging from 3.05-4.25 mmAl, except CSC with TO/BS in ratio of 1:2.","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"52 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiopacity of Portland Cement and Calcium Silicate-Based Cement with Different Mixed Ratios of Radiopacifiers\",\"authors\":\"Cholkamol Sarunket, D. Banomyong, Piyawat Vibulcharoenkitja, S. Sutimuntanakul\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/eej.2021.72691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The present study aimed to compare the radiopacity of Portland cement (PC) or calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) with different mixed radiopacifiers [bismuth oxide (BO)/ tantalum oxide (TO) and zirconium oxide (ZO)/barium sulfate (BS)] in a ratio of 1:1 or 1:2, with the 3 mm aluminium thickness (mmAl) acceptable value of ISO 6876:2012. Methods: PC and CSC mixed with different ratios of radiopacifiers were evaluated. One of high radiopacity radiopacifiers, BO or TO, was mixed with one of low radiopacity radiopacifiers, ZO or BS, in ratio of 1:1 and 1:2. PC or CSC powder, 1.6 g, was added into 0.4 g mixed radiopacifiers. Disc-shaped specimens of 1-mm thickness were prepared by mixing PC or CSC powder containing radiopacifiers with distilled water; the radiopacity was measured according to ISO 6876:2012. One-way ANOVA/Tukey's test and Welch ANOVA/Games-Howell test were used to compare the radiopacity among the groups. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: PC groups had a higher radiopacity than CSC groups with the same radiopacifiers and ratio. BO groups showed higher radiopacity than TO groups. The groups with 1:1 ratio provided a higher radiopacity than 1:2 ratio groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: All tested radiopacifiers revealed adequate radiopacity ranging from 3.05-4.25 mmAl, except CSC with TO/BS in ratio of 1:2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"52 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2021.72691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2021.72691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较硅酸盐水泥(PC)或硅酸钙基水泥(CSC)与不同混合放射性奶嘴[氧化铋(BO)/氧化钽(to)和氧化锆(ZO)/硫酸钡(BS)](比例为1:1或1:2)的辐射不透性,以及ISO 6876:2012的3mm铝厚度(mmAl)可接受值。方法:对PC和CSC与不同比例的放射性奶嘴进行混合评价。将一种高辐射不透性辐射奶嘴BO或TO与一种低辐射不透度辐射奶嘴ZO或BS以1:1和1:2的比例混合。将1.6g PC或CSC粉末加入0.4g混合的放射性奶嘴中。通过将含有放射性奶嘴的PC或CSC粉末与蒸馏水混合来制备1mm厚度的圆盘状试样;根据ISO 6876:2012测量辐射不透性。采用单向ANOVA/Tukey检验和Welch ANOVA/Games-Howell检验比较各组间的辐射能力。显著性水平设定为0.05。结果:PC组在相同的奶嘴和比例下比CSC组具有更高的辐射不透性。BO组表现出比TO组更高的放射不透性。1:1比例组的辐射不透性高于1:2比例组(P>0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Radiopacity of Portland Cement and Calcium Silicate-Based Cement with Different Mixed Ratios of Radiopacifiers
Objective: The present study aimed to compare the radiopacity of Portland cement (PC) or calcium silicate-based cement (CSC) with different mixed radiopacifiers [bismuth oxide (BO)/ tantalum oxide (TO) and zirconium oxide (ZO)/barium sulfate (BS)] in a ratio of 1:1 or 1:2, with the 3 mm aluminium thickness (mmAl) acceptable value of ISO 6876:2012. Methods: PC and CSC mixed with different ratios of radiopacifiers were evaluated. One of high radiopacity radiopacifiers, BO or TO, was mixed with one of low radiopacity radiopacifiers, ZO or BS, in ratio of 1:1 and 1:2. PC or CSC powder, 1.6 g, was added into 0.4 g mixed radiopacifiers. Disc-shaped specimens of 1-mm thickness were prepared by mixing PC or CSC powder containing radiopacifiers with distilled water; the radiopacity was measured according to ISO 6876:2012. One-way ANOVA/Tukey's test and Welch ANOVA/Games-Howell test were used to compare the radiopacity among the groups. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: PC groups had a higher radiopacity than CSC groups with the same radiopacifiers and ratio. BO groups showed higher radiopacity than TO groups. The groups with 1:1 ratio provided a higher radiopacity than 1:2 ratio groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: All tested radiopacifiers revealed adequate radiopacity ranging from 3.05-4.25 mmAl, except CSC with TO/BS in ratio of 1:2.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Effect of Final Irrigation Solutions on Mechanical Properties of Root Canal Dentine Running title: Final Irrigation on Mechanical Properties. Calcium silicate-based intracanal medication: Physicochemical properties and effectiveness of techniques for removing medication from the human root canal. Increasing the Apical Sizes of Root Enlarged for Root Canal Obturation Influences the Outcome of Single-Root-Canal Teeth Affected by Apical Periodontitis. Regenerative Treatment of Mature Teeth with Pulp Necrosis and Apical Periodontitis Using Biodentine Compared with MTA: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Controversial terminology in root and canal anatomy: A comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1