从列夫哲学的“镜子”看托尔斯泰与陀思妥耶夫斯基

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-09-03 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2021.2010419
E. Mareeva
{"title":"从列夫哲学的“镜子”看托尔斯泰与陀思妥耶夫斯基","authors":"E. Mareeva","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.2010419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article compares the works of Lev Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky as interpreted by the philosopher Lev Shestov. The author shows how Shestov analyzes Anna Karenina and War and Peace in light of Nietzschean nihilism and individualism. Criticizing the ideals of goodness and the ethics of compassion, Shestov finds himself on the side of Dostoevsky’s “underground man” as an exponent of an extreme form of egoistic thirst for life. The article outlines Shestov’s transition from Nietzschean atheism and vitalism to early Christian religiosity and mysticism, already evident in his work on Dostoevsky. However, it is still possible to discern the voice of the “underground man” in the cries of the Shestovian Job. Thus, the Nietzschean system of coordinates is preserved in the philosophy of “late” Shestov, one that proved a poor fit for Lev Tolstoy, his understanding of folk life, and his rejection of the idea of individual immortality based on individual egoism.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"394 - 404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lev Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky Through the “Mirror” of Lev Shestov’s Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"E. Mareeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2021.2010419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article compares the works of Lev Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky as interpreted by the philosopher Lev Shestov. The author shows how Shestov analyzes Anna Karenina and War and Peace in light of Nietzschean nihilism and individualism. Criticizing the ideals of goodness and the ethics of compassion, Shestov finds himself on the side of Dostoevsky’s “underground man” as an exponent of an extreme form of egoistic thirst for life. The article outlines Shestov’s transition from Nietzschean atheism and vitalism to early Christian religiosity and mysticism, already evident in his work on Dostoevsky. However, it is still possible to discern the voice of the “underground man” in the cries of the Shestovian Job. Thus, the Nietzschean system of coordinates is preserved in the philosophy of “late” Shestov, one that proved a poor fit for Lev Tolstoy, his understanding of folk life, and his rejection of the idea of individual immortality based on individual egoism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"394 - 404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2010419\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.2010419","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了列夫·托尔斯泰和哲学家列夫·舍斯托夫解读的陀思妥耶夫斯基的作品。本文以尼采的虚无主义和个人主义为视角,阐述了舍斯托夫对《安娜·卡列尼娜》和《战争与和平》的分析。谢斯托夫在批评善的理想和同情的伦理时,发现自己站在陀思妥耶夫斯基的“地下人”一边,是一种极端形式的利己主义生命渴望的倡导者。这篇文章概述了舍斯托夫从尼采无神论和生命主义到早期基督教宗教主义和神秘主义的转变,这在他关于陀思妥耶夫斯基的作品中已经很明显了。然而,在舍斯托维亚乔布的呐喊中,仍然可以辨别出“地下人”的声音。因此,尼采的坐标系保留在“晚期”舍斯托夫的哲学中,这一体系被证明不适合列夫·托尔斯泰,他对民间生活的理解,以及他对基于个人利己主义的个人不朽思想的拒绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lev Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky Through the “Mirror” of Lev Shestov’s Philosophy
ABSTRACT This article compares the works of Lev Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky as interpreted by the philosopher Lev Shestov. The author shows how Shestov analyzes Anna Karenina and War and Peace in light of Nietzschean nihilism and individualism. Criticizing the ideals of goodness and the ethics of compassion, Shestov finds himself on the side of Dostoevsky’s “underground man” as an exponent of an extreme form of egoistic thirst for life. The article outlines Shestov’s transition from Nietzschean atheism and vitalism to early Christian religiosity and mysticism, already evident in his work on Dostoevsky. However, it is still possible to discern the voice of the “underground man” in the cries of the Shestovian Job. Thus, the Nietzschean system of coordinates is preserved in the philosophy of “late” Shestov, one that proved a poor fit for Lev Tolstoy, his understanding of folk life, and his rejection of the idea of individual immortality based on individual egoism.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1