髂筋膜阻滞与标准镇痛在某区综合医院急诊科治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较——前瞻性研究及文献复习

Debkumar Chowdhury
{"title":"髂筋膜阻滞与标准镇痛在某区综合医院急诊科治疗股骨颈骨折的疗效比较——前瞻性研究及文献复习","authors":"Debkumar Chowdhury","doi":"10.21037/jeccm.2019.08.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing as the population ages with current estimates of 101,000 per year by the year 2020 in the United Kingdom. Pain has both a physiological and a psychological component to it. Early and effective analgesia has been proven to benefit patients and possibly lead to earlier return to baseline function. Through the years fascia iliaca blocks (FIBs) have been used as an adjunct management for analgesic relief in neck of femur fractures \n Methods: We carried out a preliminary study to assess the use of stickers to document various measures of pain management. There was patchy uptake of the aforementioned stickers, we subsequently reverted back to the use of our pre-existing hip fracture proforma for documentation of pain scores. There were two main parameters measured in our study in our Emergency Department in our District General Hospital. The first parameter was the time to reassessment from initial assessment. The second parameter was assessing the effectiveness of FIBs and the associated pain scores. In total we had 42 patients included in our study over a 6-month period with 25 patients undergoing FIBs. Results: The average time to reassessment was noted to be 72 min. In patients that underwent FIBs there was a 41.8% improvement in pain scores. From the study we noted that 9 patients refused to have the FIB (21.4%). From the 25 patients that underwent FIB, it was noted that 11 patients had no improvement of their pain scores from the pain score at reassessment (44%). However, it is worth noting the longer acting nature of the FIB provides patients with pain relief for longer periods especially if there is a delay to theatre. \n Conclusions: FIBs provide an effective adjunct to analgesia. We identified various measures that could be implemented for better analgesic control in patients with neck of femur fractures. We hope to undertake studies with larger number of patients to better assess the effectiveness of FIBs.","PeriodicalId":73727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jeccm.2019.08.02","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the effectiveness of fascia iliaca block with standard analgesia in neck of femur fractures in a district general hospital emergency department—a prospective study with review of literature\",\"authors\":\"Debkumar Chowdhury\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jeccm.2019.08.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing as the population ages with current estimates of 101,000 per year by the year 2020 in the United Kingdom. Pain has both a physiological and a psychological component to it. Early and effective analgesia has been proven to benefit patients and possibly lead to earlier return to baseline function. Through the years fascia iliaca blocks (FIBs) have been used as an adjunct management for analgesic relief in neck of femur fractures \\n Methods: We carried out a preliminary study to assess the use of stickers to document various measures of pain management. There was patchy uptake of the aforementioned stickers, we subsequently reverted back to the use of our pre-existing hip fracture proforma for documentation of pain scores. There were two main parameters measured in our study in our Emergency Department in our District General Hospital. The first parameter was the time to reassessment from initial assessment. The second parameter was assessing the effectiveness of FIBs and the associated pain scores. In total we had 42 patients included in our study over a 6-month period with 25 patients undergoing FIBs. Results: The average time to reassessment was noted to be 72 min. In patients that underwent FIBs there was a 41.8% improvement in pain scores. From the study we noted that 9 patients refused to have the FIB (21.4%). From the 25 patients that underwent FIB, it was noted that 11 patients had no improvement of their pain scores from the pain score at reassessment (44%). However, it is worth noting the longer acting nature of the FIB provides patients with pain relief for longer periods especially if there is a delay to theatre. \\n Conclusions: FIBs provide an effective adjunct to analgesia. We identified various measures that could be implemented for better analgesic control in patients with neck of femur fractures. We hope to undertake studies with larger number of patients to better assess the effectiveness of FIBs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/jeccm.2019.08.02\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jeccm.2019.08.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of emergency and critical care medicine (Hong Kong, China)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jeccm.2019.08.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:随着人口老龄化,髋部骨折的发病率正在增加,目前估计到2020年,英国每年有101000例髋部骨折。疼痛既有生理成分,也有心理成分。早期有效的镇痛已被证明对患者有益,并可能使患者更早恢复到基线功能。多年来,髂筋膜阻滞(FIBs)一直被用作股骨颈骨折止痛的辅助治疗方法。方法:我们进行了一项初步研究,以评估贴纸的使用情况,以记录各种疼痛管理措施。上述贴纸的吸收不完整,随后我们又恢复使用先前存在的髋部骨折形式表来记录疼痛评分。在我们的研究中,我们在区总医院急诊科测量了两个主要参数。第一个参数是从初始评估开始重新评估的时间。第二个参数是评估FIB的有效性和相关的疼痛评分。在6个月的时间里,我们总共有42名患者参与了我们的研究,其中25名患者接受了FIB。结果:重新评估的平均时间为72分钟。在接受FIBs的患者中,疼痛评分改善了41.8%。从研究中,我们注意到9名患者拒绝接受FIB(21.4%)。在接受FIB的25名患者中,有11名患者的疼痛评分与重新评估时的疼痛评分相比没有改善(44%)。然而,值得注意的是,FIB的长效性为患者提供了更长时间的疼痛缓解,尤其是在手术延迟的情况下。结论:FIBs是一种有效的镇痛辅助药物。我们确定了可以对股骨颈骨折患者进行更好的镇痛控制的各种措施。我们希望对更多的患者进行研究,以更好地评估FIBs的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing the effectiveness of fascia iliaca block with standard analgesia in neck of femur fractures in a district general hospital emergency department—a prospective study with review of literature
Background: The incidence of hip fractures is increasing as the population ages with current estimates of 101,000 per year by the year 2020 in the United Kingdom. Pain has both a physiological and a psychological component to it. Early and effective analgesia has been proven to benefit patients and possibly lead to earlier return to baseline function. Through the years fascia iliaca blocks (FIBs) have been used as an adjunct management for analgesic relief in neck of femur fractures Methods: We carried out a preliminary study to assess the use of stickers to document various measures of pain management. There was patchy uptake of the aforementioned stickers, we subsequently reverted back to the use of our pre-existing hip fracture proforma for documentation of pain scores. There were two main parameters measured in our study in our Emergency Department in our District General Hospital. The first parameter was the time to reassessment from initial assessment. The second parameter was assessing the effectiveness of FIBs and the associated pain scores. In total we had 42 patients included in our study over a 6-month period with 25 patients undergoing FIBs. Results: The average time to reassessment was noted to be 72 min. In patients that underwent FIBs there was a 41.8% improvement in pain scores. From the study we noted that 9 patients refused to have the FIB (21.4%). From the 25 patients that underwent FIB, it was noted that 11 patients had no improvement of their pain scores from the pain score at reassessment (44%). However, it is worth noting the longer acting nature of the FIB provides patients with pain relief for longer periods especially if there is a delay to theatre. Conclusions: FIBs provide an effective adjunct to analgesia. We identified various measures that could be implemented for better analgesic control in patients with neck of femur fractures. We hope to undertake studies with larger number of patients to better assess the effectiveness of FIBs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal management of mobile cabin hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience from Shanghai, China A case series of Slow continuous ultrafiltration for COVID-19 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Treatment of respiratory syncytial virus with palivizumab in an adult liver transplant recipient: a case report Pituitary apoplexy mimicking stroke and myocardial infarction: a case report Diagnosis, management and treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ICU: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1