公共医疗和教育支出的分配效应&以泰国为例

Q4 Social Sciences Journal of Community Positive Practices Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.35782/jcpp.2021.2.02
M. R. Karim
{"title":"公共医疗和教育支出的分配效应&以泰国为例","authors":"M. R. Karim","doi":"10.35782/jcpp.2021.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy advocacy of academics and researchers signify the public spending on education and health as the positive externalities and spillover effects in the society. It also promotes that social spending helps reducing income inequality and eventually reduce poverty. This study aims at analyzing the distributional effects of social spending on education and health by examining the pre and post income distribution in Thailand following the quantitative dataset of 2011. It follows calculation of benefit incidences, which is a method of computing distributional effects of public spending, based on different five income groups (poorest, poor, moderate, rich & riches). The study divulges that Thai education system seems to be pro-poor particularly for primary and secondary education whereas healthcare seems pro-rich. It is revealed that benefit of the poorest income group increased from 8.16 per cent to 9.51 per cent while it decreased from 41.48 per cent to 39.86 per cent for the richest group after government expenditure. The increase for poor and decrease for rich in income benefit after public expenditure is treated as positive for the society. The total public expenditure on these two sectors in Thailand denotes the decrease in inequality as the Gini coefficient went down to 0.2818 from 0.3056. The study suggests increasing expenditure for the rural and poor people to minimize the gap. A special stipend is suggested for the rural student to at tertiary level where richest has highest share and there is big gap in at this level. The study also recommends establishing more higher education institutes at the provincial level to benefit the poor and rural people living away from the capital. Study suggests government to impose tax on private healthcare, which is usually availed by affluent people. Likewise, government can spend more money for lower income group. Policy should also formulate to emphasize rural people than urban in order to provide benefit to the poor.","PeriodicalId":36161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Positive Practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE AND EDUCATION EXPENDITURE: A CASE OF THAILAND\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Karim\",\"doi\":\"10.35782/jcpp.2021.2.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The policy advocacy of academics and researchers signify the public spending on education and health as the positive externalities and spillover effects in the society. It also promotes that social spending helps reducing income inequality and eventually reduce poverty. This study aims at analyzing the distributional effects of social spending on education and health by examining the pre and post income distribution in Thailand following the quantitative dataset of 2011. It follows calculation of benefit incidences, which is a method of computing distributional effects of public spending, based on different five income groups (poorest, poor, moderate, rich & riches). The study divulges that Thai education system seems to be pro-poor particularly for primary and secondary education whereas healthcare seems pro-rich. It is revealed that benefit of the poorest income group increased from 8.16 per cent to 9.51 per cent while it decreased from 41.48 per cent to 39.86 per cent for the richest group after government expenditure. The increase for poor and decrease for rich in income benefit after public expenditure is treated as positive for the society. The total public expenditure on these two sectors in Thailand denotes the decrease in inequality as the Gini coefficient went down to 0.2818 from 0.3056. The study suggests increasing expenditure for the rural and poor people to minimize the gap. A special stipend is suggested for the rural student to at tertiary level where richest has highest share and there is big gap in at this level. The study also recommends establishing more higher education institutes at the provincial level to benefit the poor and rural people living away from the capital. Study suggests government to impose tax on private healthcare, which is usually availed by affluent people. Likewise, government can spend more money for lower income group. Policy should also formulate to emphasize rural people than urban in order to provide benefit to the poor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Positive Practices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Positive Practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35782/jcpp.2021.2.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Positive Practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35782/jcpp.2021.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

学术界和研究人员的政策倡导将教育和卫生方面的公共支出视为社会中的正外部性和溢出效应。它还提倡社会支出有助于减少收入不平等,最终减少贫困。本研究旨在根据2011年的定量数据集,通过检查泰国收入前后的分布,分析社会支出对教育和健康的分配影响。它遵循了福利发生率的计算,这是一种计算公共支出分配效应的方法,基于不同的五个收入群体(最贫穷、贫穷、中等收入、富人和富人)。该研究表明,泰国的教育体系似乎有利于穷人,尤其是中小学教育,而医疗保健似乎有利于富人。据透露,扣除政府支出后,最贫穷收入群体的福利从8.16%增加到9.51%,而最富有群体的福利则从41.48%下降到39.86%。公共支出后穷人收入福利的增加和富人收入福利的减少被视为对社会的积极影响。泰国这两个部门的公共支出总额表明,随着基尼系数从0.3056降至0.2818,不平等现象有所减少。该研究建议增加对农村和贫困人口的支出,以最大限度地缩小差距。建议为农村学生提供一项特殊津贴,用于最富有的人所占比例最高的高等教育,而这一水平的差距很大。该研究还建议在省级建立更多的高等教育机构,以惠及贫困人口和远离首都的农村人口。研究建议政府对私人医疗征税,而私人医疗通常由富人提供。同样,政府可以为低收入群体投入更多资金。还应制定政策,强调农村人口而非城市人口,以便为穷人提供福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DISTRIBUTIONAL EFFECTS OF PUBLIC HEALTHCARE AND EDUCATION EXPENDITURE: A CASE OF THAILAND
The policy advocacy of academics and researchers signify the public spending on education and health as the positive externalities and spillover effects in the society. It also promotes that social spending helps reducing income inequality and eventually reduce poverty. This study aims at analyzing the distributional effects of social spending on education and health by examining the pre and post income distribution in Thailand following the quantitative dataset of 2011. It follows calculation of benefit incidences, which is a method of computing distributional effects of public spending, based on different five income groups (poorest, poor, moderate, rich & riches). The study divulges that Thai education system seems to be pro-poor particularly for primary and secondary education whereas healthcare seems pro-rich. It is revealed that benefit of the poorest income group increased from 8.16 per cent to 9.51 per cent while it decreased from 41.48 per cent to 39.86 per cent for the richest group after government expenditure. The increase for poor and decrease for rich in income benefit after public expenditure is treated as positive for the society. The total public expenditure on these two sectors in Thailand denotes the decrease in inequality as the Gini coefficient went down to 0.2818 from 0.3056. The study suggests increasing expenditure for the rural and poor people to minimize the gap. A special stipend is suggested for the rural student to at tertiary level where richest has highest share and there is big gap in at this level. The study also recommends establishing more higher education institutes at the provincial level to benefit the poor and rural people living away from the capital. Study suggests government to impose tax on private healthcare, which is usually availed by affluent people. Likewise, government can spend more money for lower income group. Policy should also formulate to emphasize rural people than urban in order to provide benefit to the poor.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Positive Practices
Journal of Community Positive Practices Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ANALYSIS OF ONE VILLAGE ONE PRODUCT (OVOP) MOVEMENT IN ACEH, INDONESIA EXPLORING ROLE CONGRUITY IN POLITICAL PROCESSES: MALE VOTER PERCEPTIONS OF FEMALE CANDIDATES IN PHILIPPINE ELECTIONS BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR WOMEN IN TEA TOURISM: A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION OF POLICY CONTEXT IN YAOQU TOWNSHIP, CHINA INHERENT SUPERVISION (WASKAT) TOWARDS GOOD GOVERNANCE: THE CASE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENTS IN INDONESIA FAMILY-FRIENDLY WORKING ARRANGEMENTS IN THE V4 COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1