主动脉搏动指数:一种对晚期心力衰竭具有预后价值的新血液动力学指标

IF 4.2 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiac Failure Review Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.15420/cfr.2022.09
T. Deis, K. Rossing, F. Gustafsson
{"title":"主动脉搏动指数:一种对晚期心力衰竭具有预后价值的新血液动力学指标","authors":"T. Deis, K. Rossing, F. Gustafsson","doi":"10.15420/cfr.2022.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To test if the newly described haemodynamic variable, aortic pulsatility index (API), predicts long-term prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF). Methods: A single-centre study on 453 HF patients (median age: 51 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 19% ± 9%) referred for right heart catheterisation. API was calculated as pulse pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Results: Log(API) correlated significantly with central venous pressure (CVP; p<0.001) and cardiac index (p<0.001) in univariable regression analysis. CVP remained associated with log(API) in a multivariable analysis including cardiac index, heart rate, log(NT-proBNP [N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide]), LVEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and sex (p=0.01). In univariable Cox models, log(API) was a significant predictor of freedom from the combined endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device implantation, total artificial heart implantation or heart transplantation (HR 0.33; (95% CI [0.22–0.49]); p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.56 (95% CI [0.35–0.90]); p=0.015). After adjusting for age, sex, NYHA class III or IV and estimated glomerular filtration rate in multivariable Cox models, log(API) remained a significant predictor for the combined endpoint (HR 0.33; 95% CI [0.20–0.56]; p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.49; 95% CI [0.26–0.96]; p=0.034). Conclusion: API was strongly associated with right-sided filling pressure and independently predicted freedom from the combined endpoint and all-cause mortality.","PeriodicalId":33741,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Failure Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic Pulsatility Index: A New Haemodynamic Measure with Prognostic Value in Advanced Heart Failure\",\"authors\":\"T. Deis, K. Rossing, F. Gustafsson\",\"doi\":\"10.15420/cfr.2022.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To test if the newly described haemodynamic variable, aortic pulsatility index (API), predicts long-term prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF). Methods: A single-centre study on 453 HF patients (median age: 51 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 19% ± 9%) referred for right heart catheterisation. API was calculated as pulse pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Results: Log(API) correlated significantly with central venous pressure (CVP; p<0.001) and cardiac index (p<0.001) in univariable regression analysis. CVP remained associated with log(API) in a multivariable analysis including cardiac index, heart rate, log(NT-proBNP [N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide]), LVEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and sex (p=0.01). In univariable Cox models, log(API) was a significant predictor of freedom from the combined endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device implantation, total artificial heart implantation or heart transplantation (HR 0.33; (95% CI [0.22–0.49]); p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.56 (95% CI [0.35–0.90]); p=0.015). After adjusting for age, sex, NYHA class III or IV and estimated glomerular filtration rate in multivariable Cox models, log(API) remained a significant predictor for the combined endpoint (HR 0.33; 95% CI [0.20–0.56]; p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.49; 95% CI [0.26–0.96]; p=0.034). Conclusion: API was strongly associated with right-sided filling pressure and independently predicted freedom from the combined endpoint and all-cause mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33741,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiac Failure Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiac Failure Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2022.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Failure Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15420/cfr.2022.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的:检测新描述的血液动力学变量主动脉搏动指数(API)是否能预测晚期心力衰竭(HF)的长期预后。方法:对453名HF患者(中位年龄:51岁;左心室射血分数[LVEF]:19%±9%)进行单中心研究。API计算为脉冲压力/肺毛细血管楔压。结果:在单变量回归分析中,Log(API)与中心静脉压(CVP)和心脏指数(p<0.001)显著相关。在包括心脏指数、心率、log(NT-proBNP[N-末端B型钠尿肽原])、LVEF、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III级或IV级和性别在内的多变量分析中,CVP仍与log(API)相关(p=0.01),全人工心脏植入或心脏移植(HR 0.33;(95%CI[0.22–0.49]);p<0.001)和全因死亡率(HR 0.56(95%CI[0.35-0.90]);p=0.015)。在校正了年龄、性别、NYHA III或IV级以及多变量Cox模型中估计的肾小球滤过率后,log(API)仍然是联合终点(HR 0.33;95%CI[0.20–0.56];p<0.001)和全因死亡率(HR 0.49;95%CI[0.26–0.96];p=0.034)的重要预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aortic Pulsatility Index: A New Haemodynamic Measure with Prognostic Value in Advanced Heart Failure
Aim: To test if the newly described haemodynamic variable, aortic pulsatility index (API), predicts long-term prognosis in advanced heart failure (HF). Methods: A single-centre study on 453 HF patients (median age: 51 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF]: 19% ± 9%) referred for right heart catheterisation. API was calculated as pulse pressure/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Results: Log(API) correlated significantly with central venous pressure (CVP; p<0.001) and cardiac index (p<0.001) in univariable regression analysis. CVP remained associated with log(API) in a multivariable analysis including cardiac index, heart rate, log(NT-proBNP [N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide]), LVEF, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV and sex (p=0.01). In univariable Cox models, log(API) was a significant predictor of freedom from the combined endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device implantation, total artificial heart implantation or heart transplantation (HR 0.33; (95% CI [0.22–0.49]); p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.56 (95% CI [0.35–0.90]); p=0.015). After adjusting for age, sex, NYHA class III or IV and estimated glomerular filtration rate in multivariable Cox models, log(API) remained a significant predictor for the combined endpoint (HR 0.33; 95% CI [0.20–0.56]; p<0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.49; 95% CI [0.26–0.96]; p=0.034). Conclusion: API was strongly associated with right-sided filling pressure and independently predicted freedom from the combined endpoint and all-cause mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Frailty and Heart Failure: Clinical Insights, Patient Outcomes and Future Directions. Associations of Obesity and Prognostic Nutritional Index on 1-Year Mortality in Patients with Acute Heart Failure. Patient-specific Predictors of Haemolysis with Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices. Counteracting the Mechanisms of Heart Failure is the Most Effective Way to Decongest Patients while Improving Outcomes. Biomarkers for Congestion in Heart Failure: State-of-the-art and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1