误判

IF 0.5 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE New Political Science Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI:10.1080/07393148.2022.2119338
Alison Gash
{"title":"误判","authors":"Alison Gash","doi":"10.1080/07393148.2022.2119338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, dismantling five decades of reproductive choice established in Roe v. Wade, will have a chilling, and likely tragic, impact on women’s capacity to control their own bodies and their reproductive destinies. It may also unleash an array of policy attacks or private strikes against already vulnerable publics, outside of the context of abortion. Alito’s majority opinion and Thomas’s concurrence have placed a target on the backs of vulnerable communities by removing the glue that connected a range of protections and then explicitly calling for more carnage. Their decisions also reveal a troubling disregard for fact, science and reason.","PeriodicalId":46114,"journal":{"name":"New Political Science","volume":"44 1","pages":"500 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Miscarriage of Justice\",\"authors\":\"Alison Gash\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07393148.2022.2119338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, dismantling five decades of reproductive choice established in Roe v. Wade, will have a chilling, and likely tragic, impact on women’s capacity to control their own bodies and their reproductive destinies. It may also unleash an array of policy attacks or private strikes against already vulnerable publics, outside of the context of abortion. Alito’s majority opinion and Thomas’s concurrence have placed a target on the backs of vulnerable communities by removing the glue that connected a range of protections and then explicitly calling for more carnage. Their decisions also reveal a troubling disregard for fact, science and reason.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Science\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"500 - 505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2119338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2022.2119338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要最高法院在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案中的裁决,废除了罗诉韦德案中确立的50年的生育选择,将对女性控制自己身体和生育命运的能力产生令人不寒而栗的、可能是悲剧性的影响。它还可能在堕胎之外,对本已脆弱的公众发动一系列政策攻击或私人罢工。Alito的多数意见和Thomas的赞同,通过去除连接一系列保护措施的粘合剂,然后明确呼吁更多的屠杀,将目标放在了弱势社区的背上。他们的决定也显示出令人不安的对事实、科学和理性的漠视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Miscarriage of Justice
Abstract The Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, dismantling five decades of reproductive choice established in Roe v. Wade, will have a chilling, and likely tragic, impact on women’s capacity to control their own bodies and their reproductive destinies. It may also unleash an array of policy attacks or private strikes against already vulnerable publics, outside of the context of abortion. Alito’s majority opinion and Thomas’s concurrence have placed a target on the backs of vulnerable communities by removing the glue that connected a range of protections and then explicitly calling for more carnage. Their decisions also reveal a troubling disregard for fact, science and reason.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Political Science
New Political Science POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
Researching Hindu Nationalism as a Paradigm for Multidisciplinary Political Science Hindutva as Political Monotheism , by Anustup Basu, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2020, 296 pp., $27.95 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1-478-01094-4. Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy , by Christophe Jaffrelot, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019, 656 pp., $35.00 (hardcover), ISBN: 978-0-691-20680-6. Hindu Nationalism in India , by Tanika Sarkar, … “Which Side Are You On” The 2023 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting & Exhibition: A Timeline Nostalgia, Hypermasculinity, and the American Far Right: What Ever Happened to Being Proud of Your Boy? The Collective Trauma of International Relations The Atlantic Realists: Empire and International Political Thought Between Germany and the United States , by Matthew G. Specter, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2022, xii + 321 pp., $30.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1-50-362996-7. From the Ashes of History: Collective Trauma and the Making of International Politics , by Adam B. Lerner, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2022, 272 pp., $29.95 (paperback), ISBN: 978-0-19-… The Global Left: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow The Global Left: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow , by Immanuel Wallerstein, New York, NY: Routledge, 2022, 110 pp., $30.00 (paperback), ISBN: 978-1-138-39039-3.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1