行政公正设计

Lorne Sossin
{"title":"行政公正设计","authors":"Lorne Sossin","doi":"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the adaptation of design thinking to administrative justice. The human centred design perspective has been missing from most debates surrounding the design and reform of administrative tribunals in Canada. As a result, the author asserts that the administrative justice system in Canada at all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal, and Indigenous) is generally fragmented, poorly coordinated, and under-resourced in relation to the needs of its users and has multiple barriers of entry. This article is divided into two parts. The first part reviews the development of design thinking in the context of legal services and legal organizations. The second part explores the implications of this development for administrative justice, particularly in the context of the establishment of new tribunals. Several examples of tribunal reform are examined from a design thinking perspective. By way of conclusion, the author suggests the criteria that should be applied to evaluate the design of a new administrative tribunal. Dans cet article, l’auteur explore l’adaptation de la pensee conceptuelle a la justice administrative. L’approche conceptuelle axee sur la personne est absente de la plupart des debats entourant la conception et la reforme des tribunaux administratifs au Canada. En consequence, l’auteur fait valoir que le systeme de justice administrative du Canada de tous les ordres (administrations publiques federale, provinciales, municipales et autochtones) est generalement fragmente et mal coordonne et ne possede pas suffisamment de ressources pour repondre aux besoins de ses utilisateurs, en plus d’etre difficilement accessible. L’article comporte deux parties. Dans la premiere, l’auteur passe en revue le developpement de la pensee conceptuelle dans le contexte des services et organismes juridiques. Dans la seconde, il se penche sur les incidences de ce developpement pour la justice administrative, notamment dans le contexte de la creation de nouveaux tribunaux. Il presente aussi plusieurs exemples de reformes de tribunaux du point de vue de la pensee conceptuelle. En guise de conclusion, l’auteur suggere les criteres qu’il serait souhaitable d’appliquer pour evaluer la conception d’un nouveau tribunal administratif","PeriodicalId":56232,"journal":{"name":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","volume":"34 1","pages":"87-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Administrative Justice\",\"authors\":\"Lorne Sossin\",\"doi\":\"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the adaptation of design thinking to administrative justice. The human centred design perspective has been missing from most debates surrounding the design and reform of administrative tribunals in Canada. As a result, the author asserts that the administrative justice system in Canada at all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal, and Indigenous) is generally fragmented, poorly coordinated, and under-resourced in relation to the needs of its users and has multiple barriers of entry. This article is divided into two parts. The first part reviews the development of design thinking in the context of legal services and legal organizations. The second part explores the implications of this development for administrative justice, particularly in the context of the establishment of new tribunals. Several examples of tribunal reform are examined from a design thinking perspective. By way of conclusion, the author suggests the criteria that should be applied to evaluate the design of a new administrative tribunal. Dans cet article, l’auteur explore l’adaptation de la pensee conceptuelle a la justice administrative. L’approche conceptuelle axee sur la personne est absente de la plupart des debats entourant la conception et la reforme des tribunaux administratifs au Canada. En consequence, l’auteur fait valoir que le systeme de justice administrative du Canada de tous les ordres (administrations publiques federale, provinciales, municipales et autochtones) est generalement fragmente et mal coordonne et ne possede pas suffisamment de ressources pour repondre aux besoins de ses utilisateurs, en plus d’etre difficilement accessible. L’article comporte deux parties. Dans la premiere, l’auteur passe en revue le developpement de la pensee conceptuelle dans le contexte des services et organismes juridiques. Dans la seconde, il se penche sur les incidences de ce developpement pour la justice administrative, notamment dans le contexte de la creation de nouveaux tribunaux. Il presente aussi plusieurs exemples de reformes de tribunaux du point de vue de la pensee conceptuelle. En guise de conclusion, l’auteur suggere les criteres qu’il serait souhaitable d’appliquer pour evaluer la conception d’un nouveau tribunal administratif\",\"PeriodicalId\":56232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"87-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文探讨了设计思维对行政司法的适应。围绕加拿大行政法庭设计和改革的大多数辩论都缺乏以人为中心的设计视角。因此,作者断言,加拿大各级政府(联邦、省、市和土著)的行政司法系统在其用户的需要方面普遍支离破碎、协调不善和资源不足,存在多重障碍。本文分为两部分。第一部分回顾了法律服务和法律组织背景下设计思维的发展。第二部分探讨了这一发展对行政司法的影响,特别是在设立新法庭的背景下。从设计思维的角度研究了法庭改革的几个例子。最后,作者提出了应适用于评估新行政法庭设计的标准。在本文中,作者探讨了概念思维对行政司法的适应。在围绕加拿大行政法庭设计和改革的大多数辩论中,没有以人为中心的概念方法。因此,提交人认为,加拿大各级行政司法系统(联邦、省、市和土著政府)普遍支离破碎,协调不力,没有足够的资源满足其用户的需要,而且难以获得。本文由两部分组成。在第一部分中,作者回顾了法律服务和组织背景下概念思维的发展。第二部分讨论了这一发展对行政司法的影响,特别是在设立新法院的背景下。它还从概念思维的角度介绍了法院改革的几个例子。最后,提交人提出了评估新行政法院设计的可取标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing Administrative Justice
This article explores the adaptation of design thinking to administrative justice. The human centred design perspective has been missing from most debates surrounding the design and reform of administrative tribunals in Canada. As a result, the author asserts that the administrative justice system in Canada at all levels of government (federal, provincial, municipal, and Indigenous) is generally fragmented, poorly coordinated, and under-resourced in relation to the needs of its users and has multiple barriers of entry. This article is divided into two parts. The first part reviews the development of design thinking in the context of legal services and legal organizations. The second part explores the implications of this development for administrative justice, particularly in the context of the establishment of new tribunals. Several examples of tribunal reform are examined from a design thinking perspective. By way of conclusion, the author suggests the criteria that should be applied to evaluate the design of a new administrative tribunal. Dans cet article, l’auteur explore l’adaptation de la pensee conceptuelle a la justice administrative. L’approche conceptuelle axee sur la personne est absente de la plupart des debats entourant la conception et la reforme des tribunaux administratifs au Canada. En consequence, l’auteur fait valoir que le systeme de justice administrative du Canada de tous les ordres (administrations publiques federale, provinciales, municipales et autochtones) est generalement fragmente et mal coordonne et ne possede pas suffisamment de ressources pour repondre aux besoins de ses utilisateurs, en plus d’etre difficilement accessible. L’article comporte deux parties. Dans la premiere, l’auteur passe en revue le developpement de la pensee conceptuelle dans le contexte des services et organismes juridiques. Dans la seconde, il se penche sur les incidences de ce developpement pour la justice administrative, notamment dans le contexte de la creation de nouveaux tribunaux. Il presente aussi plusieurs exemples de reformes de tribunaux du point de vue de la pensee conceptuelle. En guise de conclusion, l’auteur suggere les criteres qu’il serait souhaitable d’appliquer pour evaluer la conception d’un nouveau tribunal administratif
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms The Triumph of the “Therapeutic” in Quebec Courts: Mental Health, Behavioural Reform and the Decline of Rights The Influence of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence in the First Decade Since its Ratification Students in Name Only: Improving the Working Conditions of Articled Students Via the Application of the BC Employment Standards Act People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1