腹腔镜胆囊癌根治性切除术1例

IF 0.2 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases Pub Date : 2017-06-27 DOI:10.5348/ijhpd-2017-68-CS-4
A. Gupta, A. Choraria, Shantanu Tiwari, H. Dubey, R. Agrawal, Sourabh Nandi, Vivek Chaudhary
{"title":"腹腔镜胆囊癌根治性切除术1例","authors":"A. Gupta, A. Choraria, Shantanu Tiwari, H. Dubey, R. Agrawal, Sourabh Nandi, Vivek Chaudhary","doi":"10.5348/ijhpd-2017-68-CS-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Introduction: Nowadays laparoscopic surgery is a very common form of treatment strategy for digestive diseases and these ‘keyhole’ surgeries provide many benefits to the patients. However, controversy exists when the laparoscopic surgery is done for early gallbladder cancer. The aim of our study was to report two such cases to see feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection.\n Case Series: Two patients underwent laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection for gallbladder carcinoma. Both patients were preoperatively diagnosed. Mean operative time was 172 minutes, and average estimated blood loss was 225 ml. There was no intraoperative complication. The liver dissection was done by Harmonic in one case and by Waterjet in the other case. Average hospital stay after surgery was four days. Postoperative morbidity included minimal bile leak in one patient only and no bile leak in patient operated with Waterjet system. Postoperative histopathology revealed adenocarcinoma of gallbladder with no lymph node invasion T2N0M0 (Stage II) in both patients. The mean lymph node retrieval was 5.5. Both patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin.\n Conclusion: We conclude that laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection is safe and beneficial for the patients with T1b/T2 gallbladder carcinoma and is useful in selected patients with a preoperative suspicion of early-stage gallbladder cancer by sparing them the necessity of a second-stage open procedure. \n \n","PeriodicalId":40532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for carcinoma gallbladder: A case series\",\"authors\":\"A. Gupta, A. Choraria, Shantanu Tiwari, H. Dubey, R. Agrawal, Sourabh Nandi, Vivek Chaudhary\",\"doi\":\"10.5348/ijhpd-2017-68-CS-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Introduction: Nowadays laparoscopic surgery is a very common form of treatment strategy for digestive diseases and these ‘keyhole’ surgeries provide many benefits to the patients. However, controversy exists when the laparoscopic surgery is done for early gallbladder cancer. The aim of our study was to report two such cases to see feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection.\\n Case Series: Two patients underwent laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection for gallbladder carcinoma. Both patients were preoperatively diagnosed. Mean operative time was 172 minutes, and average estimated blood loss was 225 ml. There was no intraoperative complication. The liver dissection was done by Harmonic in one case and by Waterjet in the other case. Average hospital stay after surgery was four days. Postoperative morbidity included minimal bile leak in one patient only and no bile leak in patient operated with Waterjet system. Postoperative histopathology revealed adenocarcinoma of gallbladder with no lymph node invasion T2N0M0 (Stage II) in both patients. The mean lymph node retrieval was 5.5. Both patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin.\\n Conclusion: We conclude that laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection is safe and beneficial for the patients with T1b/T2 gallbladder carcinoma and is useful in selected patients with a preoperative suspicion of early-stage gallbladder cancer by sparing them the necessity of a second-stage open procedure. \\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5348/ijhpd-2017-68-CS-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5348/ijhpd-2017-68-CS-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言:如今,腹腔镜手术是消化系统疾病的一种非常常见的治疗策略,这些“锁孔”手术为患者带来了许多好处。然而,当腹腔镜手术治疗早期胆囊癌症时,存在争议。我们研究的目的是报告两例这样的病例,以了解腹腔镜根治性胆囊切除术伴淋巴结清扫的可行性和安全性。病例系列:两名患者因胆囊癌接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术并淋巴结清扫。两名患者均为术前诊断。平均手术时间为172分钟,平均估计失血量为225毫升。无术中并发症。Harmonic和Waterjet分别在一例和另一例中进行了肝脏解剖。手术后平均住院时间为四天。术后发病率包括只有一名患者出现轻微胆汁泄漏,而使用Waterjet系统手术的患者没有出现胆汁泄漏。术后组织病理学显示两名患者均为胆囊腺癌,无淋巴结浸润T2N0M0(II期)。平均淋巴结回收率为5.5。两名患者均接受吉西他滨和卡铂辅助化疗。结论:腹腔镜淋巴结清扫根治性胆囊切除术对T1b/T2胆囊癌患者是安全和有益的,并且对于术前怀疑早期胆囊癌症的患者是有用的,因为他们不必进行第二阶段开放手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for carcinoma gallbladder: A case series
Introduction: Nowadays laparoscopic surgery is a very common form of treatment strategy for digestive diseases and these ‘keyhole’ surgeries provide many benefits to the patients. However, controversy exists when the laparoscopic surgery is done for early gallbladder cancer. The aim of our study was to report two such cases to see feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection. Case Series: Two patients underwent laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection for gallbladder carcinoma. Both patients were preoperatively diagnosed. Mean operative time was 172 minutes, and average estimated blood loss was 225 ml. There was no intraoperative complication. The liver dissection was done by Harmonic in one case and by Waterjet in the other case. Average hospital stay after surgery was four days. Postoperative morbidity included minimal bile leak in one patient only and no bile leak in patient operated with Waterjet system. Postoperative histopathology revealed adenocarcinoma of gallbladder with no lymph node invasion T2N0M0 (Stage II) in both patients. The mean lymph node retrieval was 5.5. Both patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and carboplatin. Conclusion: We conclude that laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection is safe and beneficial for the patients with T1b/T2 gallbladder carcinoma and is useful in selected patients with a preoperative suspicion of early-stage gallbladder cancer by sparing them the necessity of a second-stage open procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
A unique presentation of peliosis hepatis: A case report and comprehensive review of the literature Multicenter retrospective cohort study: Using trends in liver function tests to predict spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones in choledocholithiasis Multicenter retrospective cohort study: Using trends in liver function tests to predict spontaneous passage of common bile duct stones in choledocholithiasis IgG4-related inflammatory pseudotumor of the liver presenting as an incidental solitary liver mass Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a posterior infundibular approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1