当代反犹太主义的统一与多样性:布里斯托尔-谢菲尔德-哈勒姆当代反犹太主义学术讨论会

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Modern Jewish Studies Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1080/14725886.2023.2252362
Alvin H. Rosenfeld
{"title":"当代反犹太主义的统一与多样性:布里斯托尔-谢菲尔德-哈勒姆当代反犹太主义学术讨论会","authors":"Alvin H. Rosenfeld","doi":"10.1080/14725886.2023.2252362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"losophers suddenly burst onto the scene again, encouraged by the new regime, but with a new philosophy – that of Aristotle. Stroumsa tells us that the Almohad prince, Abū Ya‘qūb Yūsuf (reigned 1163–84), did not exactly commission the three layers of commentaries on Aristotle from Averroes, but the same “mode” applies to Almohad law, which starts from principles rather than being case law, and radical Aristotelianism, in which the same principles have to be universally applied (therefore, for example, Ptolemy cannot base his astronomy on “ad hoc solutions for specific problems” (153)). Nevertheless, Neoplatonic aspects remain prominent among Almohad philosophers. In the earlier section of the narrative it is difficult to distinguish philosophy from mysticism, especially in the case of Ibn Masarra’s tradition which inspired Ibn al-‘Arabī, the famous Sufi (d. 1240). Despite their various approaches Jewish and Muslim philosophers had in common their “yearning for perfection, for the sublime and the transcendent” (169). Stroumsa concludes the book with comments on the introduction of this Andalusian material into Europe through Arabic-Latin translations in the twelfth century, and the continuation of Arabic and Hebrew thought in al-Andalus beyond the twelfth century, when it became mysticism. The story continues!","PeriodicalId":52069,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Jewish Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"600 - 601"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unity and diversity in contemporary antisemitism: the Bristol-Sheffield Hallam colloquium on contemporary antisemitism\",\"authors\":\"Alvin H. Rosenfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14725886.2023.2252362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"losophers suddenly burst onto the scene again, encouraged by the new regime, but with a new philosophy – that of Aristotle. Stroumsa tells us that the Almohad prince, Abū Ya‘qūb Yūsuf (reigned 1163–84), did not exactly commission the three layers of commentaries on Aristotle from Averroes, but the same “mode” applies to Almohad law, which starts from principles rather than being case law, and radical Aristotelianism, in which the same principles have to be universally applied (therefore, for example, Ptolemy cannot base his astronomy on “ad hoc solutions for specific problems” (153)). Nevertheless, Neoplatonic aspects remain prominent among Almohad philosophers. In the earlier section of the narrative it is difficult to distinguish philosophy from mysticism, especially in the case of Ibn Masarra’s tradition which inspired Ibn al-‘Arabī, the famous Sufi (d. 1240). Despite their various approaches Jewish and Muslim philosophers had in common their “yearning for perfection, for the sublime and the transcendent” (169). Stroumsa concludes the book with comments on the introduction of this Andalusian material into Europe through Arabic-Latin translations in the twelfth century, and the continuation of Arabic and Hebrew thought in al-Andalus beyond the twelfth century, when it became mysticism. The story continues!\",\"PeriodicalId\":52069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Jewish Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"600 - 601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Jewish Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14725886.2023.2252362\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Jewish Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14725886.2023.2252362","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

losophers在新政权的鼓励下,突然又出现了,但他有了一种新的哲学——亚里士多德的哲学。斯特罗姆萨告诉我们,阿尔摩哈德王子阿布·雅克布·伊素夫(1163–84年在位)并没有完全委托埃弗罗斯对亚里士多德的三层评论,但同样的“模式”适用于阿尔摩哈德法,它始于原则而非判例法,以及激进的亚里士多德主义,其中必须普遍应用相同的原理(因此,例如,托勒密不能将他的天文学建立在“特定问题的特定解决方案”的基础上(153))。尽管如此,新柏拉图主义的方面在阿尔莫哈德哲学家中仍然很突出。在叙事的前一部分,很难将哲学与神秘主义区分开来,尤其是伊本·马萨拉的传统启发了著名的苏菲(公元1240年)伊本·阿拉布。尽管犹太和穆斯林哲学家有着不同的方法,但他们有着共同的“对完美、崇高和超越的向往”(169)。斯特鲁姆萨在书的结尾评论了12世纪通过阿拉伯语-拉丁语翻译将这种安达卢西亚材料引入欧洲,以及12世纪以后阿拉伯语和希伯来语思想在安达卢斯的延续,当时它变成了神秘主义。故事还在继续!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unity and diversity in contemporary antisemitism: the Bristol-Sheffield Hallam colloquium on contemporary antisemitism
losophers suddenly burst onto the scene again, encouraged by the new regime, but with a new philosophy – that of Aristotle. Stroumsa tells us that the Almohad prince, Abū Ya‘qūb Yūsuf (reigned 1163–84), did not exactly commission the three layers of commentaries on Aristotle from Averroes, but the same “mode” applies to Almohad law, which starts from principles rather than being case law, and radical Aristotelianism, in which the same principles have to be universally applied (therefore, for example, Ptolemy cannot base his astronomy on “ad hoc solutions for specific problems” (153)). Nevertheless, Neoplatonic aspects remain prominent among Almohad philosophers. In the earlier section of the narrative it is difficult to distinguish philosophy from mysticism, especially in the case of Ibn Masarra’s tradition which inspired Ibn al-‘Arabī, the famous Sufi (d. 1240). Despite their various approaches Jewish and Muslim philosophers had in common their “yearning for perfection, for the sublime and the transcendent” (169). Stroumsa concludes the book with comments on the introduction of this Andalusian material into Europe through Arabic-Latin translations in the twelfth century, and the continuation of Arabic and Hebrew thought in al-Andalus beyond the twelfth century, when it became mysticism. The story continues!
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Jewish Studies
Journal of Modern Jewish Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊最新文献
Dialogue and challenge: wildflowers in contemporary Israeli art mirrored in history Live chickens on the balcony and fish in the bathtub: private upkeep of Jewish traditions in the post-war Soviet Union Re-envisioning Jewish identities: reflections on contemporary culture in Israel and the diaspora The Weavers of Trautenau. Jewish Female forced labor in the Holocaust Space and Time under Persecution: The German-Jewish experience in the Third Reich
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1