创伤后生长量表得分的可靠性推广

IF 2 4区心理学 Q2 Psychology Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Pub Date : 2020-04-28 DOI:10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940

A. Lenz, Chia-Min Ho, L. Rocha, Yahyahan Aras

{"title":"创伤后生长量表得分的可靠性推广","authors":"A. Lenz, Chia-Min Ho, L. Rocha, Yahyahan Aras","doi":"10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined the degree that reliability coefficients for scores on the PTGI generalize across participant and study characteristics. Meta-analytic procedures resulted in observed and predicted mean alpha coefficients ranging from acceptable to excellent and appeared to be largely unrelated to the participant characteristics included in our meta-regression modeling procedures.","PeriodicalId":51492,"journal":{"name":"Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development","volume":"54 1","pages":"106 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability Generalization of Scores on the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory\",\"authors\":\"A. Lenz, Chia-Min Ho, L. Rocha, Yahyahan Aras\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examined the degree that reliability coefficients for scores on the PTGI generalize across participant and study characteristics. Meta-analytic procedures resulted in observed and predicted mean alpha coefficients ranging from acceptable to excellent and appeared to be largely unrelated to the participant characteristics included in our meta-regression modeling procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2020.1747940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

摘要本研究考察了PTGI分数的可靠性系数在参与者和研究特征之间的泛化程度。元分析程序导致观察和预测的平均α系数从可接受到优秀不等，并且似乎与我们的元回归建模程序中包含的参与者特征基本无关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Reliability Generalization of Scores on the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory

Abstract This study examined the degree that reliability coefficients for scores on the PTGI generalize across participant and study characteristics. Meta-analytic procedures resulted in observed and predicted mean alpha coefficients ranging from acceptable to excellent and appeared to be largely unrelated to the participant characteristics included in our meta-regression modeling procedures.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development Multiple-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

10.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development is an official journal of the Association of Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC), a member association and division of the American Counseling Association. Articles range in appeal from those that deal with theoretical and other problems of the measurement specialist to those directed to the administrator, the counselor, or the personnel worker--in schools and colleges, public and private agencies, business, industry, and government. All articles clearly describe implications for the counseling field and for practitioners, educators, administrators, researchers, or students in assessment, measurement, and evaluation.