癌症近端和中端/远端治疗方案的比较:强度调制放疗、容量调制电弧治疗和断层治疗

Yun-Chih Chen, Jang-Chun Lin, Wei-Hsiu Liu, Sheng Huang, Y. Chou, Ming‐Hsien Li, J. Tsai
{"title":"癌症近端和中端/远端治疗方案的比较:强度调制放疗、容量调制电弧治疗和断层治疗","authors":"Yun-Chih Chen, Jang-Chun Lin, Wei-Hsiu Liu, Sheng Huang, Y. Chou, Ming‐Hsien Li, J. Tsai","doi":"10.21037/TRO.2018.12.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is viewedas a definitive treatment after resection of stomach cancer (SC). To protectnormal tissue, several highly conformal radiotherapy modalities evolved.Therefore, we aimed to compare dosimetric parameters of helical tomotherapy(TOMO), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulatedradiotherapy (IMRT) in the adjuvant treatment of SC in different locations. Methods: This retrospective study wasconducted from January 2013 to May 2017 and included 11 patients with gastriccancer receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after total gastrectomy. Both IMRTand VMAT plans were generated on the Pinnacle treatment planning system andTOMO plans were generated using a helical tomotherapy system. Adjuvantradiotherapy was prescribed with a total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy in 28fractions. Results: In proximal SC, TOMO achieved asignificantly lower dose for the heart, total kidney, left kidney, and liverthan that of IMRT or VMAT (P<0.05). In middle/distal SC, lower total kidneymean dose and V20 were observed with TOMO compared with IMRT (P=0.010 and0.011, respectively) and VMAT (P=0.049; P=0.014). Conclusions: For the adjuvant treatment of gastriccancer, TOMO not only provided superior dose sparing for total kidney, leftkidney, liver V 20 and liver V 30 in patients with proximalgastric cancer but also significantly lowered the heart dose in proximal SCwhen compared to IMRT or VMAT plan.","PeriodicalId":93236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic radiology and oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/TRO.2018.12.05","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing treatment plans for proximal and middle/distal stomach cancer: intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and tomotherapy\",\"authors\":\"Yun-Chih Chen, Jang-Chun Lin, Wei-Hsiu Liu, Sheng Huang, Y. Chou, Ming‐Hsien Li, J. Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/TRO.2018.12.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is viewedas a definitive treatment after resection of stomach cancer (SC). To protectnormal tissue, several highly conformal radiotherapy modalities evolved.Therefore, we aimed to compare dosimetric parameters of helical tomotherapy(TOMO), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulatedradiotherapy (IMRT) in the adjuvant treatment of SC in different locations. Methods: This retrospective study wasconducted from January 2013 to May 2017 and included 11 patients with gastriccancer receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after total gastrectomy. Both IMRTand VMAT plans were generated on the Pinnacle treatment planning system andTOMO plans were generated using a helical tomotherapy system. Adjuvantradiotherapy was prescribed with a total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy in 28fractions. Results: In proximal SC, TOMO achieved asignificantly lower dose for the heart, total kidney, left kidney, and liverthan that of IMRT or VMAT (P<0.05). In middle/distal SC, lower total kidneymean dose and V20 were observed with TOMO compared with IMRT (P=0.010 and0.011, respectively) and VMAT (P=0.049; P=0.014). Conclusions: For the adjuvant treatment of gastriccancer, TOMO not only provided superior dose sparing for total kidney, leftkidney, liver V 20 and liver V 30 in patients with proximalgastric cancer but also significantly lowered the heart dose in proximal SCwhen compared to IMRT or VMAT plan.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic radiology and oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/TRO.2018.12.05\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic radiology and oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/TRO.2018.12.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic radiology and oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/TRO.2018.12.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:辅助放化疗被认为是癌症切除后的一种确定的治疗方法。为了保护正常组织,发展了几种高度适形的放射治疗方式。因此,我们旨在比较螺旋断层治疗(TOMO)、体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)在不同部位辅助治疗SC中的剂量测量参数。方法:本回顾性研究于2013年1月至2017年5月进行,包括11例胃癌患者在全胃切除术后接受辅助放化疗。IMRT和VMAT计划都是在Pinnacle治疗计划系统上生成的,TOMO计划是使用螺旋断层治疗系统生成的。辅助放射治疗的总辐射剂量为50.4 Gy,分为28个部分。结果:在近端SC中,TOMO对心脏、全肾、左肾和肝脏的剂量显著低于IMRT或VMAT(P<0.05)。在中/远端SC中,与IMRT(分别为P=0.010和0.011)和VMAT(P=0.049;P=0.014)相比,与IMRT或VMAT计划相比,TOMO不仅为癌症近端患者的全肾、左肾、肝V 20和肝V 30提供了更好的剂量节省,而且显著降低了近端SC的心脏剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing treatment plans for proximal and middle/distal stomach cancer: intensity-modulated radiotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and tomotherapy
Background: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is viewedas a definitive treatment after resection of stomach cancer (SC). To protectnormal tissue, several highly conformal radiotherapy modalities evolved.Therefore, we aimed to compare dosimetric parameters of helical tomotherapy(TOMO), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and intensity-modulatedradiotherapy (IMRT) in the adjuvant treatment of SC in different locations. Methods: This retrospective study wasconducted from January 2013 to May 2017 and included 11 patients with gastriccancer receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after total gastrectomy. Both IMRTand VMAT plans were generated on the Pinnacle treatment planning system andTOMO plans were generated using a helical tomotherapy system. Adjuvantradiotherapy was prescribed with a total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy in 28fractions. Results: In proximal SC, TOMO achieved asignificantly lower dose for the heart, total kidney, left kidney, and liverthan that of IMRT or VMAT (P<0.05). In middle/distal SC, lower total kidneymean dose and V20 were observed with TOMO compared with IMRT (P=0.010 and0.011, respectively) and VMAT (P=0.049; P=0.014). Conclusions: For the adjuvant treatment of gastriccancer, TOMO not only provided superior dose sparing for total kidney, leftkidney, liver V 20 and liver V 30 in patients with proximalgastric cancer but also significantly lowered the heart dose in proximal SCwhen compared to IMRT or VMAT plan.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A retrospective bilateral breast proton pencil beam scanning and photon volumetric arc therapy planning comparison. Analyses of treatment outcomes in advanced vulvar cancer: treated with postoperative radiotherapy or definitive radiotherapy/ chemoradiotherapy Prophylactic single fraction radiotherapy for the prevention of pathologic femoral fractures The impact of a mono-institutional experience in lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): a retrospective analysis Editorial: Prophylactic single fraction radiotherapy for the prevention of pathologic femoral fractures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1