添加生物炭和有机改良剂对土壤团聚体粒径分布和团聚体内总有机碳的影响

Q3 Earth and Planetary Sciences Polish Journal of Soil Science Pub Date : 2020-06-22 DOI:10.17951/pjss.2020.53.1.41
George O. Odugbenro, Zhihua Liu, Yankun Sun
{"title":"添加生物炭和有机改良剂对土壤团聚体粒径分布和团聚体内总有机碳的影响","authors":"George O. Odugbenro, Zhihua Liu, Yankun Sun","doi":"10.17951/pjss.2020.53.1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A two-year field trial on maize ( Zea mays L.) production was established to determine the influence of biochar, maize straw, and poultry manure on soil aggregate stability, aggregate size distribution, total organic carbon (TOC), and soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC). Seven treatments with four replications, namely CK, control; S, 12.5 Mg ha-1 straw; B1, 12.5 Mg ha-1 biochar; B2, 25 Mg ha-1 biochar; SB1, straw + 12.5 Mg ha-1 biochar; SB2, straw + 25 Mg ha-1 biochar; and M, 25 Mg ha-1 manure were tested at four soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40 cm). Aggregates were grouped into large macro-aggregates (5–2 mm), small macro-aggregates (2–0.25 mm), micro-aggregates (0.25–0.053 mm) and silt + clay (<0.053 mm). Biochar, straw, and manure applications all had significant effects ( p < 0.05) on aggregate stability, with B 2 at 20 cm soil depth showing the greatest increase (62.1%). SB 1 of small macro-aggregate fraction showed the highest aggregate proportion (50.59% ± 10.48) at the 20–30 cm soil depth. The highest TOC was observed in SB 2  (40.9 g kg -1 ) of large macro-aggregate at 10–20 cm soil depth. Treatment effects on soil MBC was high, with B 1 showing the greatest value (600.0 µg g -1 ) at the 20–30 cm soil depth. Our results showed that application of biochar, straw, and manure to soil increased aggregate stability, TOC as well as MBC.","PeriodicalId":20295,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Soil Science","volume":"53 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil aggregate size distribution and total organic carbon in intra-aggregate fractions as affected by addition of biochar and organic amendments\",\"authors\":\"George O. Odugbenro, Zhihua Liu, Yankun Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.17951/pjss.2020.53.1.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A two-year field trial on maize ( Zea mays L.) production was established to determine the influence of biochar, maize straw, and poultry manure on soil aggregate stability, aggregate size distribution, total organic carbon (TOC), and soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC). Seven treatments with four replications, namely CK, control; S, 12.5 Mg ha-1 straw; B1, 12.5 Mg ha-1 biochar; B2, 25 Mg ha-1 biochar; SB1, straw + 12.5 Mg ha-1 biochar; SB2, straw + 25 Mg ha-1 biochar; and M, 25 Mg ha-1 manure were tested at four soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40 cm). Aggregates were grouped into large macro-aggregates (5–2 mm), small macro-aggregates (2–0.25 mm), micro-aggregates (0.25–0.053 mm) and silt + clay (<0.053 mm). Biochar, straw, and manure applications all had significant effects ( p < 0.05) on aggregate stability, with B 2 at 20 cm soil depth showing the greatest increase (62.1%). SB 1 of small macro-aggregate fraction showed the highest aggregate proportion (50.59% ± 10.48) at the 20–30 cm soil depth. The highest TOC was observed in SB 2  (40.9 g kg -1 ) of large macro-aggregate at 10–20 cm soil depth. Treatment effects on soil MBC was high, with B 1 showing the greatest value (600.0 µg g -1 ) at the 20–30 cm soil depth. Our results showed that application of biochar, straw, and manure to soil increased aggregate stability, TOC as well as MBC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17951/pjss.2020.53.1.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Earth and Planetary Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17951/pjss.2020.53.1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

建立了玉米(Zea mays L.)生产的两年田间试验,以确定生物炭、玉米秸秆和家禽粪便对土壤团聚体稳定性、团聚体粒径分布、总有机碳(TOC)和土壤微生物生物量碳(MBC)的影响。7个处理,4个重复,即对照;S、 12.5 Mg ha-1秸秆;B1,12.5Mg-ha-1生物炭;B2,25Mg-ha-1生物炭;SB1,秸秆+12.5Mg-ha-1生物炭;SB2,秸秆+25Mg-ha-1生物炭;在4个土壤深度(0–10、10–20、20–30和30–40 cm)测试了M,25 Mg ha-1肥料。骨料分为大宏观骨料(5–2 mm)、小宏观骨料(2–0.25 mm)、微骨料(0.25–0.053 mm)和淤泥+粘土(<0.053 mm)。施用生物炭、秸秆和粪肥对团聚体的稳定性都有显著影响(p<0.05),其中在20 cm土层中B2的增幅最大(62.1%)。在20–30 cm土层中,小团聚体组分的SB 1的团聚体比例最高(50.59%±10.48)。在10–20 cm土壤深度的SB 2(40.9 g kg-1)中观察到最高的TOC。处理对土壤MBC的影响较大,B1在20-30 cm土层中表现出最大值(600.0µg g-1)。我们的研究结果表明,在土壤中施用生物炭、秸秆和粪肥可以提高团聚体的稳定性、TOC和MBC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soil aggregate size distribution and total organic carbon in intra-aggregate fractions as affected by addition of biochar and organic amendments
A two-year field trial on maize ( Zea mays L.) production was established to determine the influence of biochar, maize straw, and poultry manure on soil aggregate stability, aggregate size distribution, total organic carbon (TOC), and soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC). Seven treatments with four replications, namely CK, control; S, 12.5 Mg ha-1 straw; B1, 12.5 Mg ha-1 biochar; B2, 25 Mg ha-1 biochar; SB1, straw + 12.5 Mg ha-1 biochar; SB2, straw + 25 Mg ha-1 biochar; and M, 25 Mg ha-1 manure were tested at four soil depths (0–10, 10–20, 20–30, and 30–40 cm). Aggregates were grouped into large macro-aggregates (5–2 mm), small macro-aggregates (2–0.25 mm), micro-aggregates (0.25–0.053 mm) and silt + clay (<0.053 mm). Biochar, straw, and manure applications all had significant effects ( p < 0.05) on aggregate stability, with B 2 at 20 cm soil depth showing the greatest increase (62.1%). SB 1 of small macro-aggregate fraction showed the highest aggregate proportion (50.59% ± 10.48) at the 20–30 cm soil depth. The highest TOC was observed in SB 2  (40.9 g kg -1 ) of large macro-aggregate at 10–20 cm soil depth. Treatment effects on soil MBC was high, with B 1 showing the greatest value (600.0 µg g -1 ) at the 20–30 cm soil depth. Our results showed that application of biochar, straw, and manure to soil increased aggregate stability, TOC as well as MBC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polish Journal of Soil Science
Polish Journal of Soil Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: The Journal focuses mainly on all issues of soil sciences, agricultural chemistry, soil technology and protection and soil environmental functions. Papers concerning various aspects of functioning of the environment (including geochemistry, geomophology, geoecology etc.) as well as new techniques of surveing, especially remote sensing, are also published.
期刊最新文献
Application Technique and Dosage of Halotolerant Nitrogen Biofertilizer for Increasing Soil Total N, N Uptake, Chlorophyll Content, Photosynthate Accumulation and Growth of Rice Plants in Saline Ecosystem Distribution of Carbon Stocks in Peat Bottom Based on Thickness Class in Pelalawan Village (Riau Province, Indonesia) Characterization and Bioassay of Rhizophosphate Bacteria Producing Phytohormone and Organic Acid to Enhance the Maize Seedling Growth Black Soils Outside of the INBS Criteria in Slovakia Effects of Different Land Use Types on Soil Physico-Chemical Properties in Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1