儿科住院病人使用退热药情况的评估

Annet Jodiya, P. Annamalai, Aksa Mary Joseph, Lavanya Siddaiahnakoppalu Umesha, J. Sebastian, Mandhyam Dhati Ravi
{"title":"儿科住院病人使用退热药情况的评估","authors":"Annet Jodiya, P. Annamalai, Aksa Mary Joseph, Lavanya Siddaiahnakoppalu Umesha, J. Sebastian, Mandhyam Dhati Ravi","doi":"10.1080/24694193.2021.1957042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Parents often misinterpret fever as being harmful. Fear of fever results in excessive use of antipyretics, unnecessary emergency department visits and financial burden. The aims of the study were to determine the utilization pattern of antipyretics and assess the knowledge and practice (KP) of parents on antipyretics usage. One part of the study design was interventional and the other was cross-sectional, conducted for a period of 6 months. Study included inpatients from pediatric department who were receiving antipyretic medications to determine the utilization pattern of antipyretics. A validated questionnaire was administered to the enrolled subject’s parents to assess their KP on antipyretic usage. Among the 250 study population enrolled, paracetamol was found to be the most commonly used antipyretic. 90% of the enrolled study population were mothers. 95.20% of parents believed fever was harmful, 81.6% considered a temperature of 38°C as fever and would start antipyretics. Only 38.4% had a thermometer at home, 73.20% administered antipyretics without prescription. About 62% believed drowsiness was a complication of antipyretics. The level of education of parents showed a positive impact on the perception of fever. Knowledge score based on socioeconomic status was also found to be significant. The lack of digital thermometer and inaccurate measurement of temperature has led to fever phobia, and the correct management of febrile illness remains unclear among the parents. Educating parents may positively influence their approach to fever and antipyretic usage.","PeriodicalId":45903,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Antipyretics Usage in Pediatric Inpatients\",\"authors\":\"Annet Jodiya, P. Annamalai, Aksa Mary Joseph, Lavanya Siddaiahnakoppalu Umesha, J. Sebastian, Mandhyam Dhati Ravi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24694193.2021.1957042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Parents often misinterpret fever as being harmful. Fear of fever results in excessive use of antipyretics, unnecessary emergency department visits and financial burden. The aims of the study were to determine the utilization pattern of antipyretics and assess the knowledge and practice (KP) of parents on antipyretics usage. One part of the study design was interventional and the other was cross-sectional, conducted for a period of 6 months. Study included inpatients from pediatric department who were receiving antipyretic medications to determine the utilization pattern of antipyretics. A validated questionnaire was administered to the enrolled subject’s parents to assess their KP on antipyretic usage. Among the 250 study population enrolled, paracetamol was found to be the most commonly used antipyretic. 90% of the enrolled study population were mothers. 95.20% of parents believed fever was harmful, 81.6% considered a temperature of 38°C as fever and would start antipyretics. Only 38.4% had a thermometer at home, 73.20% administered antipyretics without prescription. About 62% believed drowsiness was a complication of antipyretics. The level of education of parents showed a positive impact on the perception of fever. Knowledge score based on socioeconomic status was also found to be significant. The lack of digital thermometer and inaccurate measurement of temperature has led to fever phobia, and the correct management of febrile illness remains unclear among the parents. Educating parents may positively influence their approach to fever and antipyretic usage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2021.1957042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Child and Adolescent Nursing-Building Evidence for Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24694193.2021.1957042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要父母常常误解发烧是有害的。对发烧的恐惧会导致过度使用退烧药、不必要的急诊就诊和经济负担。本研究的目的是确定退烧药的使用模式,并评估家长对退烧药使用的知识和实践(KP)。研究设计的一部分是介入性的,另一部分是横断面的,为期6个月。这项研究包括儿科住院患者,他们正在接受退烧药治疗,以确定退烧药的使用模式。对入组受试者的父母进行了一份经验证的问卷调查,以评估他们的KP对退烧药的使用情况。在250名参与研究的人群中,对乙酰氨基酚被发现是最常用的退热药。90%的研究对象是母亲。95.20%的家长认为发烧有害,81.6%的家长认为38°C的温度是发烧,会开始服用退烧药。只有38.4%的人在家里有温度计,73.20%的人在没有处方的情况下服用退烧药。大约62%的人认为嗜睡是退烧药的并发症。父母的教育水平对发烧的感知有积极影响。基于社会经济地位的知识得分也被发现是显著的。缺乏数字体温计和不准确的体温测量导致了发烧恐惧症,家长们对发热疾病的正确管理仍不清楚。对父母进行教育可能会对他们使用发烧和退烧药的方法产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Antipyretics Usage in Pediatric Inpatients
ABSTRACT Parents often misinterpret fever as being harmful. Fear of fever results in excessive use of antipyretics, unnecessary emergency department visits and financial burden. The aims of the study were to determine the utilization pattern of antipyretics and assess the knowledge and practice (KP) of parents on antipyretics usage. One part of the study design was interventional and the other was cross-sectional, conducted for a period of 6 months. Study included inpatients from pediatric department who were receiving antipyretic medications to determine the utilization pattern of antipyretics. A validated questionnaire was administered to the enrolled subject’s parents to assess their KP on antipyretic usage. Among the 250 study population enrolled, paracetamol was found to be the most commonly used antipyretic. 90% of the enrolled study population were mothers. 95.20% of parents believed fever was harmful, 81.6% considered a temperature of 38°C as fever and would start antipyretics. Only 38.4% had a thermometer at home, 73.20% administered antipyretics without prescription. About 62% believed drowsiness was a complication of antipyretics. The level of education of parents showed a positive impact on the perception of fever. Knowledge score based on socioeconomic status was also found to be significant. The lack of digital thermometer and inaccurate measurement of temperature has led to fever phobia, and the correct management of febrile illness remains unclear among the parents. Educating parents may positively influence their approach to fever and antipyretic usage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
The Covid-19 Pandemic’s Forgotten Children A Compass for Nursing Specialty Professional Development Development of a Foundation Protocol for Feeding Complex Care Neonates and Enablers and Barriers to Its Implementation Can a Measles Epidemic Be Avoided in 2022? Why Should the Welfare of Therapy Animals Involved in Animal Assisted Interventions Matter to Child Healthcare Researchers and Professionals?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1