P. Quinio, Benoît Beiler, P. Lider, B. Demoré, J. Vigneron
{"title":"输液袋更换干扰细胞毒性输液的质量控制","authors":"P. Quinio, Benoît Beiler, P. Lider, B. Demoré, J. Vigneron","doi":"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In our centralized unit for the preparation of anticancer drugs, quality control is carried out by flow injection analysis (FIA) with detection by photodiode array detector. Criteria of concentration acceptance were established with ±10% of the theoretical concentration. The infusions were prepared with polyolefin infusions bags (Easyflex). However, due to an Easyflex shortage, Viaflo infusion bags were used and cyclophosphamide (CPM) concentrations showed a 10% increase despite a similar manufacturing process. The objectives of this work were to study the influence of different containers on CPM concentrations measured by FIA and to investigate the origin of this artificial increase in concentration. Methods: Thirty infusions were prepared using 3 different infusion bags: Viaflo multilayer container, Ecoflac, low-density polyethylene, and Easyflex polyolefin bags. Vials of CPM 1g were reconstituted with 50mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. CPM was injected into 0.9% sodium chloride 250-mL infusion bags. Then 1mL samples were withdrawn to be analyzed by FIA, to determine CPM concentrations (ultraviolet detection at 205nm). Results: Mean CPM concentration values (n=10) were 3.52mg/mL for Viaflo infusions, 3.12mg/mL for Ecoflac infusions, and 3.16mg/mL for Easyflex infusions. CPM concentrations were higher in Viaflo infusion bags. This difference could be explained by e-caprolactam, a component released by the multilayer infusion bag. Conclusion: Viaflo infusion bags disturb outcomes of CPM dosage with a concentration artificially increased by about 10%. The FIA method cannot be used to quantify CPM at this concentration and at wavelength 205nm. Abbreviations: CPM = cyclophosphamide; FIA = flow injection analysis; HDPE = high-density polyethylene; HPLC = highperformance liquid chromatography; LDPE = low-density polyethylene; PDA = photodiode array; RP-HPLC = reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography; UV = ultraviolet.","PeriodicalId":39134,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality control of cytotoxic infusions disturbed by a change of infusion bag\",\"authors\":\"P. Quinio, Benoît Beiler, P. Lider, B. Demoré, J. Vigneron\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In our centralized unit for the preparation of anticancer drugs, quality control is carried out by flow injection analysis (FIA) with detection by photodiode array detector. Criteria of concentration acceptance were established with ±10% of the theoretical concentration. The infusions were prepared with polyolefin infusions bags (Easyflex). However, due to an Easyflex shortage, Viaflo infusion bags were used and cyclophosphamide (CPM) concentrations showed a 10% increase despite a similar manufacturing process. The objectives of this work were to study the influence of different containers on CPM concentrations measured by FIA and to investigate the origin of this artificial increase in concentration. Methods: Thirty infusions were prepared using 3 different infusion bags: Viaflo multilayer container, Ecoflac, low-density polyethylene, and Easyflex polyolefin bags. Vials of CPM 1g were reconstituted with 50mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. CPM was injected into 0.9% sodium chloride 250-mL infusion bags. Then 1mL samples were withdrawn to be analyzed by FIA, to determine CPM concentrations (ultraviolet detection at 205nm). Results: Mean CPM concentration values (n=10) were 3.52mg/mL for Viaflo infusions, 3.12mg/mL for Ecoflac infusions, and 3.16mg/mL for Easyflex infusions. CPM concentrations were higher in Viaflo infusion bags. This difference could be explained by e-caprolactam, a component released by the multilayer infusion bag. Conclusion: Viaflo infusion bags disturb outcomes of CPM dosage with a concentration artificially increased by about 10%. The FIA method cannot be used to quantify CPM at this concentration and at wavelength 205nm. Abbreviations: CPM = cyclophosphamide; FIA = flow injection analysis; HDPE = high-density polyethylene; HPLC = highperformance liquid chromatography; LDPE = low-density polyethylene; PDA = photodiode array; RP-HPLC = reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography; UV = ultraviolet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OP9.0000000000000016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Quality control of cytotoxic infusions disturbed by a change of infusion bag
Introduction: In our centralized unit for the preparation of anticancer drugs, quality control is carried out by flow injection analysis (FIA) with detection by photodiode array detector. Criteria of concentration acceptance were established with ±10% of the theoretical concentration. The infusions were prepared with polyolefin infusions bags (Easyflex). However, due to an Easyflex shortage, Viaflo infusion bags were used and cyclophosphamide (CPM) concentrations showed a 10% increase despite a similar manufacturing process. The objectives of this work were to study the influence of different containers on CPM concentrations measured by FIA and to investigate the origin of this artificial increase in concentration. Methods: Thirty infusions were prepared using 3 different infusion bags: Viaflo multilayer container, Ecoflac, low-density polyethylene, and Easyflex polyolefin bags. Vials of CPM 1g were reconstituted with 50mL of 0.9% sodium chloride. CPM was injected into 0.9% sodium chloride 250-mL infusion bags. Then 1mL samples were withdrawn to be analyzed by FIA, to determine CPM concentrations (ultraviolet detection at 205nm). Results: Mean CPM concentration values (n=10) were 3.52mg/mL for Viaflo infusions, 3.12mg/mL for Ecoflac infusions, and 3.16mg/mL for Easyflex infusions. CPM concentrations were higher in Viaflo infusion bags. This difference could be explained by e-caprolactam, a component released by the multilayer infusion bag. Conclusion: Viaflo infusion bags disturb outcomes of CPM dosage with a concentration artificially increased by about 10%. The FIA method cannot be used to quantify CPM at this concentration and at wavelength 205nm. Abbreviations: CPM = cyclophosphamide; FIA = flow injection analysis; HDPE = high-density polyethylene; HPLC = highperformance liquid chromatography; LDPE = low-density polyethylene; PDA = photodiode array; RP-HPLC = reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography; UV = ultraviolet.