本体论与意识形态:安与海德格尔的哲学政治对峙

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY Critical Historical Studies Pub Date : 2017-03-01 DOI:10.1086/690967
Jason Dawsey
{"title":"本体论与意识形态:安与海德格尔的哲学政治对峙","authors":"Jason Dawsey","doi":"10.1086/690967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article integrates Günther Anders, a critic of technology and antinuclear militant still not widely known in the Anglophone world, into current critical discussions about Heidegger’s Nazism and his legacy for modern thought. It does so by sketching Anders’s many biographical connections but mainly focuses on his critiques of the political implications of Being and Time and of the later Heidegger. These two critiques I treat as parts of one larger “confrontation” with the reactionary character of Heideggerian philosophy. This article should help clarify Anders’s place in the history of Heideggerianism and also set the stage for a detailed evaluation of Anders’s approach to modern technology.","PeriodicalId":43410,"journal":{"name":"Critical Historical Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"1 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/690967","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ontology and Ideology: Günther Anders’s Philosophical and Political Confrontation with Heidegger\",\"authors\":\"Jason Dawsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/690967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article integrates Günther Anders, a critic of technology and antinuclear militant still not widely known in the Anglophone world, into current critical discussions about Heidegger’s Nazism and his legacy for modern thought. It does so by sketching Anders’s many biographical connections but mainly focuses on his critiques of the political implications of Being and Time and of the later Heidegger. These two critiques I treat as parts of one larger “confrontation” with the reactionary character of Heideggerian philosophy. This article should help clarify Anders’s place in the history of Heideggerianism and also set the stage for a detailed evaluation of Anders’s approach to modern technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Historical Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/690967\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Historical Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/690967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Historical Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/690967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章将技术评论家和反核激进分子Günther Anders整合到当前关于海德格尔的纳粹主义及其现代思想遗产的批判性讨论中,他在英语世界中仍然不为人所知。它通过勾勒安德斯的许多传记联系来做到这一点,但主要集中在他对《存在与时间》和后来的海德格尔的政治含义的批评上。我把这两个批评看作是与海德格尔哲学的反动性质的一次更大的“对抗”的一部分。这篇文章有助于澄清安德斯在海德格尔主义史上的地位,也为详细评价安德斯的现代技术方法奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ontology and Ideology: Günther Anders’s Philosophical and Political Confrontation with Heidegger
This article integrates Günther Anders, a critic of technology and antinuclear militant still not widely known in the Anglophone world, into current critical discussions about Heidegger’s Nazism and his legacy for modern thought. It does so by sketching Anders’s many biographical connections but mainly focuses on his critiques of the political implications of Being and Time and of the later Heidegger. These two critiques I treat as parts of one larger “confrontation” with the reactionary character of Heideggerian philosophy. This article should help clarify Anders’s place in the history of Heideggerianism and also set the stage for a detailed evaluation of Anders’s approach to modern technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Colonialism, Surplus Population, and the Marxian Critique of Political Economy Hayek against Malthus: Julian Simon’s Neoliberal Critique of Environmentalism Temporalities of Emancipation: Women, Work, and Time in 1970s America Reactionaries Marching Forward: On Worldmaking and Its Enemies Enclosed Futures: Oil Extraction in the Republic of Congo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1