В医生专业互动的基础:合并和分离的案例

Y. Babenko
{"title":"В医生专业互动的基础:合并和分离的案例","authors":"Y. Babenko","doi":"10.25040/medicallaw2023.01.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the basis of international and national normative acts, the ethical norms of interaction of doctors with each other are highlighted. The limits of intervention in the process of providing medical care to the patient by the attending physician and cases of involvement of other specialists in the treat- ment process are analyzed. The cases of the necessity of convening a doctor’s council in the provision of a specific type of medical care are considered on the example of the provisions of normative legal acts. \nIt has been established: \n \nthe timely detection of medical errors and criticism of the doctor’s actions in the correct form gives a positive result for achieving an effective health care system and establishing the principle of priority provision of the patient’s right to protection of life and health; \nremarks and assessment of another doctor’s actions should not have the purpose of belittling his work or luring patients; \nfrank neglect of one’s duties, unscrupulous and poor-quality provision of medical care to the patient must be recorded and stopped, including by fel- low \n","PeriodicalId":91928,"journal":{"name":"Medychne pravo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Вasics of Professional Interaction of Doctors: Cases of Combination and Separation\",\"authors\":\"Y. Babenko\",\"doi\":\"10.25040/medicallaw2023.01.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On the basis of international and national normative acts, the ethical norms of interaction of doctors with each other are highlighted. The limits of intervention in the process of providing medical care to the patient by the attending physician and cases of involvement of other specialists in the treat- ment process are analyzed. The cases of the necessity of convening a doctor’s council in the provision of a specific type of medical care are considered on the example of the provisions of normative legal acts. \\nIt has been established: \\n \\nthe timely detection of medical errors and criticism of the doctor’s actions in the correct form gives a positive result for achieving an effective health care system and establishing the principle of priority provision of the patient’s right to protection of life and health; \\nremarks and assessment of another doctor’s actions should not have the purpose of belittling his work or luring patients; \\nfrank neglect of one’s duties, unscrupulous and poor-quality provision of medical care to the patient must be recorded and stopped, including by fel- low \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":91928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medychne pravo\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medychne pravo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25040/medicallaw2023.01.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medychne pravo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25040/medicallaw2023.01.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在国际和国家规范性法案的基础上,强调了医生之间互动的伦理规范。分析了主治医师在为患者提供医疗护理过程中的干预限制以及其他专家参与治疗过程的情况。以规范性法律法规的规定为例,审议了在提供特定类型的医疗服务时需要召开医生委员会的情况。它已经确立:及时发现医疗错误并以正确的形式批评医生的行为,为建立有效的医疗保健系统和确立优先保障患者生命和健康权利的原则带来了积极的结果;对另一名医生行为的评论和评估不应以贬低其工作或引诱患者为目的;必须记录并制止公然玩忽职守、肆无忌惮和质量低劣地为病人提供医疗服务的行为,包括fel-low
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Вasics of Professional Interaction of Doctors: Cases of Combination and Separation
On the basis of international and national normative acts, the ethical norms of interaction of doctors with each other are highlighted. The limits of intervention in the process of providing medical care to the patient by the attending physician and cases of involvement of other specialists in the treat- ment process are analyzed. The cases of the necessity of convening a doctor’s council in the provision of a specific type of medical care are considered on the example of the provisions of normative legal acts. It has been established: the timely detection of medical errors and criticism of the doctor’s actions in the correct form gives a positive result for achieving an effective health care system and establishing the principle of priority provision of the patient’s right to protection of life and health; remarks and assessment of another doctor’s actions should not have the purpose of belittling his work or luring patients; frank neglect of one’s duties, unscrupulous and poor-quality provision of medical care to the patient must be recorded and stopped, including by fel- low
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The fulfillment of reproductive rights in Ukraine: balancing the EU standards and the challenges of the war How the supervisory board was replaced by a monitoring board in the Healthcare unit A «Tacit Consent» to Transplantation: to be оr Not to be The abuse of patentability conditions in the sphere of pharmacy in Ukraine and the EpO: upon the Example of polymorph sofosbuvir The right to healthcare under the conditions of Transitional justice: the flamboyance and poverty of Ukrainian civics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1