喀斯特云杉的生长反应。增加Borer伤害

IF 1.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 FORESTRY Tree-Ring Research Pub Date : 2021-07-20 DOI:10.3959/TRR2020-13
A. Fabiánová, K. Šilhán
{"title":"喀斯特云杉的生长反应。增加Borer伤害","authors":"A. Fabiánová, K. Šilhán","doi":"10.3959/TRR2020-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As the use of the increment borer is supposed to be invasive, there is a question of how coring affects subsequent growth or the health of various tree species. Ten Picea abies (L.) Karst. trees in the Beskydy Mts. (Czech Republic) were analysed nine years after coring by an increment borer (June 2011) to determine their anatomical and growth responses to the coring. Cores (13 per tree) were extracted at regular vertical and horizontal distances to evaluate the spatio-temporal pattern of the responses. Sixty percent of trees reacted to the increment boring by creating a vertical crack at the end of year 2011. Traumatic Resin Ducts (TRDs) appeared in all trees relatively soon after coring, with a predominance in the vertical axis. In the horizontal axis, TRDs gradually disappeared with increasing distance from the old coring hole. Overall the spatio-temporal occurrence of TRDs varied in the tree trunk. The immediacy of the response was indirectly dependent on the distance from the 2011 core. Trees responded by growth release the following year after coring as well. The duration of growth disturbances reached three years on average. The results show that P. abies trees are not critically endangered by increment borer coring.","PeriodicalId":54416,"journal":{"name":"Tree-Ring Research","volume":"77 1","pages":"74 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Growth Responses of Picea abies (L.) Karst. to Increment Borer Wounding\",\"authors\":\"A. Fabiánová, K. Šilhán\",\"doi\":\"10.3959/TRR2020-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As the use of the increment borer is supposed to be invasive, there is a question of how coring affects subsequent growth or the health of various tree species. Ten Picea abies (L.) Karst. trees in the Beskydy Mts. (Czech Republic) were analysed nine years after coring by an increment borer (June 2011) to determine their anatomical and growth responses to the coring. Cores (13 per tree) were extracted at regular vertical and horizontal distances to evaluate the spatio-temporal pattern of the responses. Sixty percent of trees reacted to the increment boring by creating a vertical crack at the end of year 2011. Traumatic Resin Ducts (TRDs) appeared in all trees relatively soon after coring, with a predominance in the vertical axis. In the horizontal axis, TRDs gradually disappeared with increasing distance from the old coring hole. Overall the spatio-temporal occurrence of TRDs varied in the tree trunk. The immediacy of the response was indirectly dependent on the distance from the 2011 core. Trees responded by growth release the following year after coring as well. The duration of growth disturbances reached three years on average. The results show that P. abies trees are not critically endangered by increment borer coring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"74 - 85\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tree-Ring Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3959/TRR2020-13\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree-Ring Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3959/TRR2020-13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要由于增量蛀虫的使用被认为是入侵性的,因此取芯如何影响各种树木的后续生长或健康是一个问题。喀斯特十棵云杉。Beskydy Mts(捷克共和国)的树木在用增量蛀虫取芯九年后(2011年6月)进行了分析,以确定它们对取芯的解剖和生长反应。以规则的垂直和水平距离提取核心(每棵树13个),以评估反应的时空模式。2011年底,60%的树木对增量钻孔的反应是产生垂直裂缝。取芯后不久,所有树木中都出现了创伤树脂管(TRD),在垂直轴上占主导地位。在水平轴上,TRD随着与旧取芯孔距离的增加而逐渐消失。总体而言,TRD在树干中的时空发生率各不相同。反应的及时性间接取决于与2011年核心的距离。树木在取芯后的第二年也通过释放生长来做出反应。生长紊乱的持续时间平均达到三年。研究结果表明,增量螟取芯对冷杉树没有严重危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Growth Responses of Picea abies (L.) Karst. to Increment Borer Wounding
ABSTRACT As the use of the increment borer is supposed to be invasive, there is a question of how coring affects subsequent growth or the health of various tree species. Ten Picea abies (L.) Karst. trees in the Beskydy Mts. (Czech Republic) were analysed nine years after coring by an increment borer (June 2011) to determine their anatomical and growth responses to the coring. Cores (13 per tree) were extracted at regular vertical and horizontal distances to evaluate the spatio-temporal pattern of the responses. Sixty percent of trees reacted to the increment boring by creating a vertical crack at the end of year 2011. Traumatic Resin Ducts (TRDs) appeared in all trees relatively soon after coring, with a predominance in the vertical axis. In the horizontal axis, TRDs gradually disappeared with increasing distance from the old coring hole. Overall the spatio-temporal occurrence of TRDs varied in the tree trunk. The immediacy of the response was indirectly dependent on the distance from the 2011 core. Trees responded by growth release the following year after coring as well. The duration of growth disturbances reached three years on average. The results show that P. abies trees are not critically endangered by increment borer coring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tree-Ring Research
Tree-Ring Research 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Tree-Ring Research (TRR) is devoted to papers dealing with the growth rings of trees and the applications of tree-ring research in a wide variety of fields, including but not limited to archaeology, geology, ecology, hydrology, climatology, forestry, and botany. Papers involving research results, new techniques of data acquisition or analysis, and regional or subject-oriented reviews or syntheses are considered for publication. Scientific papers usually fall into two main categories. Articles should not exceed 5000 words, or approximately 20 double-spaced typewritten pages, including tables, references, and an abstract of 200 words or fewer. All manuscripts submitted as Articles are reviewed by at least two referees. Research Reports, which are usually reviewed by at least one outside referee, should not exceed 1500 words or include more than two figures. Research Reports address technical developments, describe well-documented but preliminary research results, or present findings for which the Article format is not appropriate. Book or monograph Reviews of 500 words or less are also considered. Other categories of papers are occasionally published. All papers are published only in English. Abstracts of the Articles or Reports may be printed in other languages if supplied by the author(s) with English translations.
期刊最新文献
Tree-ring analysis of red spruce timbers from the Moosilauke Ravine Lodge, White Mountains, New Hampshire Precipitation reconstruction using tree-ring chronologies from Jordan and the Eastern Mediterranean Region Analysis of the Climate Signal in Subannual Width Measurements of Pinus nigra Tree Rings in Kastamonu Province, Turkey A Review of the Current State and Future Prospects of Dendrochronological Research in Bhutan A Case Study: Growth of Tree-Form Willow Driven by Cool, Wet Springs and Warm, Dry Summers in Teetł'it Zheh (Fort Mcpherson), Northwest Territories, Canada
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1