序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)预测重症监护患者压疮风险:一项回顾性队列研究。

Q2 Nursing Ostomy Wound Management Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.25270/OWM.2018.10.3238
Maarit Ahtiala, E. Soppi, T. Saari
{"title":"序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)预测重症监护患者压疮风险:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Maarit Ahtiala, E. Soppi, T. Saari","doi":"10.25270/OWM.2018.10.3238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pressure ulcer (PU) risk assessment practices in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients remain varied.\n\n\nPURPOSE\nThe authors assessed the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale and its subcategories in predicting the development of PUs.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients admitted to the mixed medical-surgical ICU of a Finnish tertiary referral hospital between January 2010 and December 2012. Data (diagnoses, demographics, clinical information, treatments, and instrument scores) were retrieved from the ICU database. Wilcoxon and chi-squared tests were used to examine patient subgroup (medical or surgical ICU and intensive care or high-dependency care patients), length of ICU stay (LOS), modified Jackson/Cubbin (mJ/C) scores and SOFA subcategory variables, and first-day SOFA scores. PU association was determined by logistical regression.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAmong the 4899 patients in the study population, the overall PU incidence of acquired PUs was 8.1%. Medical patients had significantly more PUs (145/1281; 11.3%) than surgical patients (212/3468; 6.1%) (P <.0001). In all subgroups, significantly more patients with PUs had higher SOFA scores (mean 8.24) than patients without PUs (mean 6.74) (P =.001). The difference persisted when patients with LOS ≥3 days in the ICU were considered. Among the SOFA subcategories, the Glasgow Coma score, renal and respiratory disorders, and hypotension were significantly (P <.0001) linked to PU development. First-day total SOFA score and its cardiovascular and respiratory subcategory scores were the most important predictors of PUs.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe total SOFA score provides an additional tool to assess PU risk in ICUs and should be used together with the Braden or the mJ/C Scale.","PeriodicalId":54656,"journal":{"name":"Ostomy Wound Management","volume":"64 10 1","pages":"32-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) to Predict Pressure Ulcer Risk in Intensive Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Maarit Ahtiala, E. Soppi, T. Saari\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/OWM.2018.10.3238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Pressure ulcer (PU) risk assessment practices in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients remain varied.\\n\\n\\nPURPOSE\\nThe authors assessed the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale and its subcategories in predicting the development of PUs.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients admitted to the mixed medical-surgical ICU of a Finnish tertiary referral hospital between January 2010 and December 2012. Data (diagnoses, demographics, clinical information, treatments, and instrument scores) were retrieved from the ICU database. Wilcoxon and chi-squared tests were used to examine patient subgroup (medical or surgical ICU and intensive care or high-dependency care patients), length of ICU stay (LOS), modified Jackson/Cubbin (mJ/C) scores and SOFA subcategory variables, and first-day SOFA scores. PU association was determined by logistical regression.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAmong the 4899 patients in the study population, the overall PU incidence of acquired PUs was 8.1%. Medical patients had significantly more PUs (145/1281; 11.3%) than surgical patients (212/3468; 6.1%) (P <.0001). In all subgroups, significantly more patients with PUs had higher SOFA scores (mean 8.24) than patients without PUs (mean 6.74) (P =.001). The difference persisted when patients with LOS ≥3 days in the ICU were considered. Among the SOFA subcategories, the Glasgow Coma score, renal and respiratory disorders, and hypotension were significantly (P <.0001) linked to PU development. First-day total SOFA score and its cardiovascular and respiratory subcategory scores were the most important predictors of PUs.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nThe total SOFA score provides an additional tool to assess PU risk in ICUs and should be used together with the Braden or the mJ/C Scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ostomy Wound Management\",\"volume\":\"64 10 1\",\"pages\":\"32-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ostomy Wound Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/OWM.2018.10.3238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ostomy Wound Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/OWM.2018.10.3238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

成人重症监护室(ICU)患者的压疮(PU)风险评估实践仍然各不相同。目的作者评估了顺序器官衰竭评估(SOFA)量表及其子类别在预测PUs发展方面的表现。方法对2010年1月至2012年12月期间入住芬兰一家三级转诊医院混合医学外科ICU的所有成年患者进行回顾性队列研究。从ICU数据库中检索数据(诊断、人口统计、临床信息、治疗和仪器评分)。Wilcoxon和卡方检验用于检查患者亚组(医疗或外科ICU和重症监护或高依赖性护理患者)、ICU住院时间(LOS)、改良Jackson/Cubbin(mJ/C)评分和SOFA子类别变量以及第一天SOFA评分。PU相关性通过逻辑回归确定。结果在研究人群中的4899名患者中,获得性PU的总PU发生率为8.1%。内科患者的PU发生率(145/1281;11.3%)显著高于外科患者(212/3468;6.1%)(P<0.0001)。在所有亚组中,有PUs的患者SOFA评分(平均8.24)明显高于无PUs的(平均6.74)(P=0.001)。当考虑到在ICU中LOS≥3天的患者时,这种差异仍然存在。在SOFA亚类中,格拉斯哥昏迷评分、肾脏和呼吸系统疾病以及低血压与PU的发展显著相关(P<.0001)。第一天SOFA总分及其心血管和呼吸子类别评分是PUs最重要的预测因素。结论SOFA总分为评估ICU中PU风险提供了一个额外的工具,应与Braden或mJ/C量表一起使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) to Predict Pressure Ulcer Risk in Intensive Care Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Pressure ulcer (PU) risk assessment practices in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients remain varied. PURPOSE The authors assessed the performance of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scale and its subcategories in predicting the development of PUs. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all adult patients admitted to the mixed medical-surgical ICU of a Finnish tertiary referral hospital between January 2010 and December 2012. Data (diagnoses, demographics, clinical information, treatments, and instrument scores) were retrieved from the ICU database. Wilcoxon and chi-squared tests were used to examine patient subgroup (medical or surgical ICU and intensive care or high-dependency care patients), length of ICU stay (LOS), modified Jackson/Cubbin (mJ/C) scores and SOFA subcategory variables, and first-day SOFA scores. PU association was determined by logistical regression. RESULTS Among the 4899 patients in the study population, the overall PU incidence of acquired PUs was 8.1%. Medical patients had significantly more PUs (145/1281; 11.3%) than surgical patients (212/3468; 6.1%) (P <.0001). In all subgroups, significantly more patients with PUs had higher SOFA scores (mean 8.24) than patients without PUs (mean 6.74) (P =.001). The difference persisted when patients with LOS ≥3 days in the ICU were considered. Among the SOFA subcategories, the Glasgow Coma score, renal and respiratory disorders, and hypotension were significantly (P <.0001) linked to PU development. First-day total SOFA score and its cardiovascular and respiratory subcategory scores were the most important predictors of PUs. CONCLUSION The total SOFA score provides an additional tool to assess PU risk in ICUs and should be used together with the Braden or the mJ/C Scale.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ostomy Wound Management
Ostomy Wound Management 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.99
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ostomy/Wound Management was founded in March of 1980 as "Ostomy Management." In 1985, this small journal dramatically expanded its content and readership by embracing the overlapping disciplines of ostomy care, wound care, incontinence care, and related skin and nutritional issues and became the premier journal of its kind. Ostomy/Wound Managements" readers include healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines. Today, our readers benefit from contemporary and comprehensive review and research papers that are practical, clinically oriented, and cutting edge. Each published article undergoes a rigorous double-blind peer review by members of both the Editorial Advisory Board and the Ad-Hoc Peer Review Panel.
期刊最新文献
Pyoderma gangrenosum and peripheral arterial disease: a case series and literature review Time to refocus on the principles of lower limb ulceration management EWMA 2023 Conference abstracts Effects of local antibiotics in calcium-sulphate granules for the treatment of diabetic forefoot osteomyelitis: a propensity-matched observational study Organisation of NPWT in primary care in Europe – a descriptive survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1