{"title":"纪念Glenn Ballard博士的节日","authors":"L. Koskela, I. Tommelein, C. Formoso, R. Sacks","doi":"10.1080/01446193.2022.2076391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Festschrift honours the seminal achievements of Dr. Glenn Ballard in academia and in construction practice. As an academic, Glenn is one of the most influential scholars in construction management, both a prolific writer and highly cited. As a practitioner, he has had enormous influence: management methods that he pioneered are in everyday use in construction projects throughout the world. Indeed, Glenn’s achievements are so significant that it is difficult to pinpoint any other person with greater influence on the theory and practice of construction management. Yet Glenn presents us with an enigma. We see few, if any, of the usual antecedents for an influential and impactful career in construction management: he has no formal education in construction management; he has not held a tenured position at a university; he has not had access to generous research funding; he has not held any influential position in a big organisation in which he might have trialled new ideas; and he has neither collected nor analysed large sets of empirical data. How, then, has he been able to gain insight and have a significant impact in academia and industry? First, instead of formal education in construction management, he gained first-hand experience and understanding of construction as a field worker on site and then breaking through to managerial positions. Second, instead of gaining formal academic standing, he has collaborated with both industryand academic peers and with numerous students to amplify intellectual efforts. Third, instead of relying on academic funding, he excelled at working with individuals and companies to carry out research in the field. Fourth, instead of influence within an organisation, he has turned to community building, both in research and in industry. Fifth, instead of seeing research as only data collection and analysis, his research is characterised by identifying and actively solving problems encountered in practice. The desire to celebrate Glenn’s accomplishments and honour his influence on our own work and that of so many others, came in anticipation of his 75th birthday celebration. As “plans are forecasts and forecasts are always wrong”—one of many of Glenn’s apt characterisations of the state of affairs—the Covid pandemic derailed our plan, and it is only now coming to realisation with this Festschrift. We start with a short biography. Short biography","PeriodicalId":51389,"journal":{"name":"Construction Management and Economics","volume":"40 1","pages":"497 - 506"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Festschrift honouring Dr. Glenn Ballard\",\"authors\":\"L. Koskela, I. Tommelein, C. Formoso, R. Sacks\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01446193.2022.2076391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Festschrift honours the seminal achievements of Dr. Glenn Ballard in academia and in construction practice. As an academic, Glenn is one of the most influential scholars in construction management, both a prolific writer and highly cited. As a practitioner, he has had enormous influence: management methods that he pioneered are in everyday use in construction projects throughout the world. Indeed, Glenn’s achievements are so significant that it is difficult to pinpoint any other person with greater influence on the theory and practice of construction management. Yet Glenn presents us with an enigma. We see few, if any, of the usual antecedents for an influential and impactful career in construction management: he has no formal education in construction management; he has not held a tenured position at a university; he has not had access to generous research funding; he has not held any influential position in a big organisation in which he might have trialled new ideas; and he has neither collected nor analysed large sets of empirical data. How, then, has he been able to gain insight and have a significant impact in academia and industry? First, instead of formal education in construction management, he gained first-hand experience and understanding of construction as a field worker on site and then breaking through to managerial positions. Second, instead of gaining formal academic standing, he has collaborated with both industryand academic peers and with numerous students to amplify intellectual efforts. Third, instead of relying on academic funding, he excelled at working with individuals and companies to carry out research in the field. Fourth, instead of influence within an organisation, he has turned to community building, both in research and in industry. Fifth, instead of seeing research as only data collection and analysis, his research is characterised by identifying and actively solving problems encountered in practice. The desire to celebrate Glenn’s accomplishments and honour his influence on our own work and that of so many others, came in anticipation of his 75th birthday celebration. As “plans are forecasts and forecasts are always wrong”—one of many of Glenn’s apt characterisations of the state of affairs—the Covid pandemic derailed our plan, and it is only now coming to realisation with this Festschrift. We start with a short biography. Short biography\",\"PeriodicalId\":51389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Construction Management and Economics\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"497 - 506\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Construction Management and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2076391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2022.2076391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This Festschrift honours the seminal achievements of Dr. Glenn Ballard in academia and in construction practice. As an academic, Glenn is one of the most influential scholars in construction management, both a prolific writer and highly cited. As a practitioner, he has had enormous influence: management methods that he pioneered are in everyday use in construction projects throughout the world. Indeed, Glenn’s achievements are so significant that it is difficult to pinpoint any other person with greater influence on the theory and practice of construction management. Yet Glenn presents us with an enigma. We see few, if any, of the usual antecedents for an influential and impactful career in construction management: he has no formal education in construction management; he has not held a tenured position at a university; he has not had access to generous research funding; he has not held any influential position in a big organisation in which he might have trialled new ideas; and he has neither collected nor analysed large sets of empirical data. How, then, has he been able to gain insight and have a significant impact in academia and industry? First, instead of formal education in construction management, he gained first-hand experience and understanding of construction as a field worker on site and then breaking through to managerial positions. Second, instead of gaining formal academic standing, he has collaborated with both industryand academic peers and with numerous students to amplify intellectual efforts. Third, instead of relying on academic funding, he excelled at working with individuals and companies to carry out research in the field. Fourth, instead of influence within an organisation, he has turned to community building, both in research and in industry. Fifth, instead of seeing research as only data collection and analysis, his research is characterised by identifying and actively solving problems encountered in practice. The desire to celebrate Glenn’s accomplishments and honour his influence on our own work and that of so many others, came in anticipation of his 75th birthday celebration. As “plans are forecasts and forecasts are always wrong”—one of many of Glenn’s apt characterisations of the state of affairs—the Covid pandemic derailed our plan, and it is only now coming to realisation with this Festschrift. We start with a short biography. Short biography
期刊介绍:
Construction Management and Economics publishes high-quality original research concerning the management and economics of activity in the construction industry. Our concern is the production of the built environment. We seek to extend the concept of construction beyond on-site production to include a wide range of value-adding activities and involving coalitions of multiple actors, including clients and users, that evolve over time. We embrace the entire range of construction services provided by the architecture/engineering/construction sector, including design, procurement and through-life management. We welcome papers that demonstrate how the range of diverse academic and professional disciplines enable robust and novel theoretical, methodological and/or empirical insights into the world of construction. Ultimately, our aim is to inform and advance academic debates in the various disciplines that converge on the construction sector as a topic of research. While we expect papers to have strong theoretical positioning, we also seek contributions that offer critical, reflexive accounts on practice. Construction Management & Economics now publishes the following article types: -Research Papers -Notes - offering a comment on a previously published paper or report a new idea, empirical finding or approach. -Book Reviews -Letters - terse, scholarly comments on any aspect of interest to our readership. Commentaries -Obituaries - welcome in relation to significant figures in our field.