可测量的时间就是可治理的时间:探索儿童保育社会工作中的时间性和时间治理

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Time & Society Pub Date : 2022-02-07 DOI:10.1177/0961463X211059022
Teres Hjärpe
{"title":"可测量的时间就是可治理的时间:探索儿童保育社会工作中的时间性和时间治理","authors":"Teres Hjärpe","doi":"10.1177/0961463X211059022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article deals with the workings of time governance in welfare professional settings. A contribution is made to current literature by offering insights into how ‘governing by the clock’ works at the micro-level in everyday interaction and why clock time is purposeful for the operation of power in a welfare bureaucratic context. The main argument posited is that measurability and decontextualisation are characteristics of clock time, facilitating the governance of professionals’ decisions and actions, and ultimately their time use. The argument is illustrated with empirical data from ethnographic fieldwork following social workers responsible for childcare investigations in Sweden. The interaction in focus regards efforts to meet a deadline of four months to complete the investigations inscribed in the Social Services Act. As a start, the article illustrates what relational, task-oriented and clock time approaches can imply for time use and childcare investigations, with the purpose of visualising the characteristics providing advantages of clock time for governance. After that, the more concrete workings of time governance are explored in how the objectified clock time, through these characteristics, works as a resource both for subtle routine and self-governing processes, and when the operation of power is more explicit. It is demonstrated how social workers make meaning, plan and conduct childcare investigations in order to make it possible to meet the deadline, sometimes with trade-offs. The governance relies on the facticity of the objectified time frame and the high knowledge status it is assigned in participants’ interaction. The analysis demonstrates the workings when a seemingly ‘soft’ time limit gets reified and trumps other sources for professional knowledge when decisions are legitimised, sometimes with unintended consequences. By analysing social work as a profession performed at the intersection of different time rhythms, a contribution is made to research on governance and street-level bureaucrats’ dilemmas.","PeriodicalId":47347,"journal":{"name":"Time & Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"291 - 314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurable time is governable time: Exploring temporality and time governance in childcare social work\",\"authors\":\"Teres Hjärpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0961463X211059022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article deals with the workings of time governance in welfare professional settings. A contribution is made to current literature by offering insights into how ‘governing by the clock’ works at the micro-level in everyday interaction and why clock time is purposeful for the operation of power in a welfare bureaucratic context. The main argument posited is that measurability and decontextualisation are characteristics of clock time, facilitating the governance of professionals’ decisions and actions, and ultimately their time use. The argument is illustrated with empirical data from ethnographic fieldwork following social workers responsible for childcare investigations in Sweden. The interaction in focus regards efforts to meet a deadline of four months to complete the investigations inscribed in the Social Services Act. As a start, the article illustrates what relational, task-oriented and clock time approaches can imply for time use and childcare investigations, with the purpose of visualising the characteristics providing advantages of clock time for governance. After that, the more concrete workings of time governance are explored in how the objectified clock time, through these characteristics, works as a resource both for subtle routine and self-governing processes, and when the operation of power is more explicit. It is demonstrated how social workers make meaning, plan and conduct childcare investigations in order to make it possible to meet the deadline, sometimes with trade-offs. The governance relies on the facticity of the objectified time frame and the high knowledge status it is assigned in participants’ interaction. The analysis demonstrates the workings when a seemingly ‘soft’ time limit gets reified and trumps other sources for professional knowledge when decisions are legitimised, sometimes with unintended consequences. By analysing social work as a profession performed at the intersection of different time rhythms, a contribution is made to research on governance and street-level bureaucrats’ dilemmas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Time & Society\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Time & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X211059022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Time & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X211059022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文论述了福利专业环境中时间治理的运作方式。通过深入了解“时钟管理”在日常互动中如何在微观层面发挥作用,以及为什么时钟时间是有目的的,用于福利官僚背景下的权力运作,为当前的文献做出了贡献。主要论点是,可测量性和去文本化是时钟时间的特征,有助于管理专业人员的决策和行动,并最终促进他们的时间使用。在瑞典负责儿童保育调查的社会工作者之后,民族志实地调查的实证数据说明了这一论点。互动的重点是努力在四个月的最后期限内完成《社会服务法》规定的调查。首先,本文阐述了关系、任务导向和时钟时间方法对时间使用和儿童保育调查的意义,目的是可视化时钟时间为治理提供优势的特征。之后,探索了时间治理的更具体的运作方式,即客体化的时钟时间如何通过这些特征,作为微妙的日常和自治过程的资源,以及权力的运作何时更加明确。它展示了社会工作者如何理解、计划和进行儿童保育调查,以使其有可能在最后期限前完成,有时需要权衡取舍。治理依赖于对象化时间框架的真实性,以及它在参与者互动中被赋予的高度知识地位。该分析展示了当一个看似“软”的时限被具体化时的工作原理,并在决策合法化时胜过其他专业知识来源,有时会产生意想不到的后果。通过分析社会工作作为一种在不同时间节奏的交叉点上进行的职业,对研究治理和街头官僚的困境做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measurable time is governable time: Exploring temporality and time governance in childcare social work
This article deals with the workings of time governance in welfare professional settings. A contribution is made to current literature by offering insights into how ‘governing by the clock’ works at the micro-level in everyday interaction and why clock time is purposeful for the operation of power in a welfare bureaucratic context. The main argument posited is that measurability and decontextualisation are characteristics of clock time, facilitating the governance of professionals’ decisions and actions, and ultimately their time use. The argument is illustrated with empirical data from ethnographic fieldwork following social workers responsible for childcare investigations in Sweden. The interaction in focus regards efforts to meet a deadline of four months to complete the investigations inscribed in the Social Services Act. As a start, the article illustrates what relational, task-oriented and clock time approaches can imply for time use and childcare investigations, with the purpose of visualising the characteristics providing advantages of clock time for governance. After that, the more concrete workings of time governance are explored in how the objectified clock time, through these characteristics, works as a resource both for subtle routine and self-governing processes, and when the operation of power is more explicit. It is demonstrated how social workers make meaning, plan and conduct childcare investigations in order to make it possible to meet the deadline, sometimes with trade-offs. The governance relies on the facticity of the objectified time frame and the high knowledge status it is assigned in participants’ interaction. The analysis demonstrates the workings when a seemingly ‘soft’ time limit gets reified and trumps other sources for professional knowledge when decisions are legitimised, sometimes with unintended consequences. By analysing social work as a profession performed at the intersection of different time rhythms, a contribution is made to research on governance and street-level bureaucrats’ dilemmas.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Time & Society
Time & Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Time & Society publishes articles, reviews, and scholarly comment discussing the workings of time and temporality across a range of disciplines, including anthropology, geography, history, psychology, and sociology. Work focuses on methodological and theoretical problems, including the use of time in organizational contexts. You"ll also find critiques of and proposals for time-related changes in the formation of public, social, economic, and organizational policies.
期刊最新文献
Beyond mothers’ time in childcare: Worlds of care and connection in the early life course Time use studies, time, temporality, and measuring care: Conceptual, methodological, and epistemological issues Fixing stone in time: Making and measuring consolidants for heritage futures Time and the Anthropocene: Making more-than-human temporalities legible through environmental observations and creative methods Hope and time work in dystopian contexts: Future-oriented temporalities of activism in post-referendum Scotland and Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1