{"title":"菲律宾和美国修正的几乎完全标度的测量不变性","authors":"Clarissa M. E. Richardson, J. A. Datu","doi":"10.1080/21507686.2020.1808027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Almost Perfect Scale-Revised measures perfectionism using three subscales: Standards (i.e., expectations set by the self), Discrepancy (i.e., self-criticism related to not reaching these expectations or standards), and Order (i.e., tendency to appreciate orderliness). Measurement invariance was tested using undergraduate students from the Philippines (N = 487) and the United States (N = 396). Exploratory structural equation modelling models showed reasonable fit for a three-factor structure, and metric invariance was supported. Results suggest that we can trust comparison of correlation/regression coefficients across the two samples in addition to any comparisons between associations of predictors and various outcomes between the two samples.","PeriodicalId":42294,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","volume":"11 1","pages":"220 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507686.2020.1808027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement invariance of the almost perfect scale-revised in the Philippines and the United States\",\"authors\":\"Clarissa M. E. Richardson, J. A. Datu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507686.2020.1808027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Almost Perfect Scale-Revised measures perfectionism using three subscales: Standards (i.e., expectations set by the self), Discrepancy (i.e., self-criticism related to not reaching these expectations or standards), and Order (i.e., tendency to appreciate orderliness). Measurement invariance was tested using undergraduate students from the Philippines (N = 487) and the United States (N = 396). Exploratory structural equation modelling models showed reasonable fit for a three-factor structure, and metric invariance was supported. Results suggest that we can trust comparison of correlation/regression coefficients across the two samples in addition to any comparisons between associations of predictors and various outcomes between the two samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"220 - 228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21507686.2020.1808027\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2020.1808027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507686.2020.1808027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measurement invariance of the almost perfect scale-revised in the Philippines and the United States
ABSTRACT The Almost Perfect Scale-Revised measures perfectionism using three subscales: Standards (i.e., expectations set by the self), Discrepancy (i.e., self-criticism related to not reaching these expectations or standards), and Order (i.e., tendency to appreciate orderliness). Measurement invariance was tested using undergraduate students from the Philippines (N = 487) and the United States (N = 396). Exploratory structural equation modelling models showed reasonable fit for a three-factor structure, and metric invariance was supported. Results suggest that we can trust comparison of correlation/regression coefficients across the two samples in addition to any comparisons between associations of predictors and various outcomes between the two samples.