{"title":"本末倒置:用巧妙的练习保持行动学习的新鲜感","authors":"J. Traeger","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2022.2082816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At Mayvin, we have developed a particular style of action learning. We call this ‘ practice-based learning ’ . This has evolved through our work with clients, primarily with the UK Civil Service ’ s cross-government community of organisation development and design prac-titioners. The essence of this is a practice-based learning question, derived from the work of our associate Dr. Richard Hale (see e.g. Hale 2014). We have evolved a ques-tion-based approach, using the formula ‘ how can I develop my ‘ X ’ , in the service of ‘ Y ’ and the context of ‘ Z ’ ? , where ‘ X ’ is my own development edge; ‘ Y ’ is the particular arena of practice I am focussed on (often involving the human dynamics of this change) and ‘ Z ’ is the wider, systemic context. We think this is how action learning pro-vides more containment to a person ’ s learning, by combining it with a structure drawn from action research, for example, Reason and Torbert ’ s ‘ 1st, 2nd and 3rd person ’ formula for systemic change (Reason and Torbert 2001). In short, this ensures action learning practice goes beyond the (sometimes legitimate) critique as a ‘ talking shop ’ or ‘ pity party ’ , towards a focus on personal learning and impactful change. This structure is further reinforced by our accreditation process (as an academic partner of the University of Chichester) which enables us to build a curriculum around a person ’ s action learning question, centred on detailed re fl ection on practice, rather than through abstract theory. Each person puts ‘ how they show up ’ at the centre of their learning, and this can be evidenced at the post-graduate level, up to the attainment of a Masters ’ degree. The requirements of accreditation can add bene fi ts of providing continuity and the impetus enabling engagement in a busy world full of distractions, that can pull people away from the important but less urgent realm of learning. But it can at times have a cart-before-horse impact; the danger is people can elevate the","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cart before the horse: using artful practice to keep action learning fresh\",\"authors\":\"J. Traeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14767333.2022.2082816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At Mayvin, we have developed a particular style of action learning. We call this ‘ practice-based learning ’ . This has evolved through our work with clients, primarily with the UK Civil Service ’ s cross-government community of organisation development and design prac-titioners. The essence of this is a practice-based learning question, derived from the work of our associate Dr. Richard Hale (see e.g. Hale 2014). We have evolved a ques-tion-based approach, using the formula ‘ how can I develop my ‘ X ’ , in the service of ‘ Y ’ and the context of ‘ Z ’ ? , where ‘ X ’ is my own development edge; ‘ Y ’ is the particular arena of practice I am focussed on (often involving the human dynamics of this change) and ‘ Z ’ is the wider, systemic context. We think this is how action learning pro-vides more containment to a person ’ s learning, by combining it with a structure drawn from action research, for example, Reason and Torbert ’ s ‘ 1st, 2nd and 3rd person ’ formula for systemic change (Reason and Torbert 2001). In short, this ensures action learning practice goes beyond the (sometimes legitimate) critique as a ‘ talking shop ’ or ‘ pity party ’ , towards a focus on personal learning and impactful change. This structure is further reinforced by our accreditation process (as an academic partner of the University of Chichester) which enables us to build a curriculum around a person ’ s action learning question, centred on detailed re fl ection on practice, rather than through abstract theory. Each person puts ‘ how they show up ’ at the centre of their learning, and this can be evidenced at the post-graduate level, up to the attainment of a Masters ’ degree. The requirements of accreditation can add bene fi ts of providing continuity and the impetus enabling engagement in a busy world full of distractions, that can pull people away from the important but less urgent realm of learning. But it can at times have a cart-before-horse impact; the danger is people can elevate the\",\"PeriodicalId\":44898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2022.2082816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2022.2082816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在Mayvin,我们开发了一种特殊的行动学习风格。我们称之为“基于实践的学习”。这是通过我们与客户的合作而发展起来的,主要是与英国公务员的跨政府组织开发和设计顾问社区合作。这是一个基于实践的学习问题,源于我们的助理Richard Hale博士的工作(例如,见Hale 2014)。我们已经发展了一种基于问题的方法,使用公式“我如何开发我的‘X’,为‘Y’和‘Z’服务?”,其中“X”是我自己的发展优势“Y”是我关注的特定实践领域(通常涉及这种变化的人类动力学),“Z”是更广泛的系统背景。我们认为,这就是行动学习如何通过将其与行动研究中的结构相结合,为一个人的学习提供更多的遏制,例如,Reason和Torbert关于系统性变化的“第一、第二和第三人称”公式(Reason and Torbert 2001)。简言之,这确保了行动学习实践超越了(有时是合法的)作为“谈话商店”或“怜悯派对”的批评,而是专注于个人学习和有影响力的改变。我们的认证过程(作为奇切斯特大学的学术合作伙伴)进一步强化了这一结构,使我们能够围绕一个人的行动学习问题构建课程,以对实践的详细反思为中心,而不是通过抽象理论。每个人都把“如何表现”放在学习的中心,这一点可以在研究生阶段得到证明,直到获得硕士学位。认证的要求可以增加在一个充满干扰的繁忙世界中提供连续性和动力的好处,这可以让人们远离重要但不那么紧迫的学习领域。但它有时会先车后马;危险在于人们可以提升
The cart before the horse: using artful practice to keep action learning fresh
At Mayvin, we have developed a particular style of action learning. We call this ‘ practice-based learning ’ . This has evolved through our work with clients, primarily with the UK Civil Service ’ s cross-government community of organisation development and design prac-titioners. The essence of this is a practice-based learning question, derived from the work of our associate Dr. Richard Hale (see e.g. Hale 2014). We have evolved a ques-tion-based approach, using the formula ‘ how can I develop my ‘ X ’ , in the service of ‘ Y ’ and the context of ‘ Z ’ ? , where ‘ X ’ is my own development edge; ‘ Y ’ is the particular arena of practice I am focussed on (often involving the human dynamics of this change) and ‘ Z ’ is the wider, systemic context. We think this is how action learning pro-vides more containment to a person ’ s learning, by combining it with a structure drawn from action research, for example, Reason and Torbert ’ s ‘ 1st, 2nd and 3rd person ’ formula for systemic change (Reason and Torbert 2001). In short, this ensures action learning practice goes beyond the (sometimes legitimate) critique as a ‘ talking shop ’ or ‘ pity party ’ , towards a focus on personal learning and impactful change. This structure is further reinforced by our accreditation process (as an academic partner of the University of Chichester) which enables us to build a curriculum around a person ’ s action learning question, centred on detailed re fl ection on practice, rather than through abstract theory. Each person puts ‘ how they show up ’ at the centre of their learning, and this can be evidenced at the post-graduate level, up to the attainment of a Masters ’ degree. The requirements of accreditation can add bene fi ts of providing continuity and the impetus enabling engagement in a busy world full of distractions, that can pull people away from the important but less urgent realm of learning. But it can at times have a cart-before-horse impact; the danger is people can elevate the